Is there an equivalent to app.config for libraries (DLLs)? If not, what is the easiest way to store configuration settings that are specific to a library? Please consider that the library might be used in different applications.
155
votes
15 Answers
166
votes
You can have separate configuration file, but you'll have to read it "manually", the ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["key"] will read only the config of the running assembly.
Assuming you're using Visual Studio as your IDE, you can right click the desired project → Add → New item → Application Configuration File
This will add App.config to the project folder, put your settings in there under <appSettings> section. In case you're not using Visual Studio and adding the file manually, make sure to give it such name: DllName.dll.config, otherwise the below code won't work properly.
Now to read from this file have such function:
string GetAppSetting(Configuration config, string key)
{
KeyValueConfigurationElement element = config.AppSettings.Settings[key];
if (element != null)
{
string value = element.Value;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(value))
return value;
}
return string.Empty;
}
And to use it:
Configuration config = null;
string exeConfigPath = this.GetType().Assembly.Location;
try
{
config = ConfigurationManager.OpenExeConfiguration(exeConfigPath);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
//handle errror here.. means DLL has no sattelite configuration file.
}
if (config != null)
{
string myValue = GetAppSetting(config, "myKey");
...
}
You'll also have to add reference to System.Configuration namespace in order to have the ConfigurationManager class available.
When building the project, in addition to the DLL you'll have DllName.dll.config file as well, that's the file you have to publish with the DLL itself.
The above is basic sample code, for those interested in a full scale example, please refer to this other answer.
30
votes
Unfortunately, you can only have one app.config file per executable, so if you have DLL’s linked into your application, they cannot have their own app.config files.
Solution is:
You don't need to put the App.config file in the Class Library's project.
You put the App.config file in the application that is referencing your class
library's dll.
For example, let's say we have a class library named MyClasses.dll which uses the app.config file like so:
string connect =
ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings["MyClasses.ConnectionString"];
Now, let's say we have an Windows Application named MyApp.exe which references MyClasses.dll. It would contain an App.config with an entry such as:
<appSettings>
<add key="MyClasses.ConnectionString"
value="Connection string body goes here" />
</appSettings>
OR
An xml file is best equivalent for app.config. Use xml serialize/deserialize as needed. You can call it what every you want. If your config is "static" and does not need to change, your could also add it to the project as an embedded resource.
Hope it gives some Idea
9
votes
Configuration files are application-scoped and not assembly-scoped. So you'll need to put your library's configuration sections in every application's configuration file that is using your library.
That said, it is not a good practice to get configuration from the application's configuration file, specially the appSettings section, in a class library. If your library needs parameters, they should probably be passed as method arguments in constructors, factory methods, etc. by whoever is calling your library. This prevents calling applications from accidentally reusing configuration entries that were expected by the class library.
That said, XML configuration files are extremely handy, so the best compromise that I've found is using custom configuration sections. You get to put your library's configuration in an XML file that is automatically read and parsed by the framework and you avoid potential accidents.
You can learn more about custom configuration sections on MSDN and also Phil Haack has a nice article on them.
5
votes
I am currently creating plugins for a retail software brand, which are actually .net class libraries. As a requirement, each plugin needs to be configured using a config file. After a bit of research and testing, I compiled the following class. It does the job flawlessly. Note that I haven't implemented local exception handling in my case because, I catch exceptions at a higher level.
Some tweaking maybe needed to get the decimal point right, in case of decimals and doubles, but it works fine for my CultureInfo...
static class Settings
{
static UriBuilder uri = new UriBuilder(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().CodeBase);
static Configuration myDllConfig = ConfigurationManager.OpenExeConfiguration(uri.Path);
static AppSettingsSection AppSettings = (AppSettingsSection)myDllConfig.GetSection("appSettings");
static NumberFormatInfo nfi = new NumberFormatInfo()
{
NumberGroupSeparator = "",
CurrencyDecimalSeparator = "."
};
public static T Setting<T>(string name)
{
return (T)Convert.ChangeType(AppSettings.Settings[name].Value, typeof(T), nfi);
}
}
App.Config file sample
<add key="Enabled" value="true" />
<add key="ExportPath" value="c:\" />
<add key="Seconds" value="25" />
<add key="Ratio" value="0.14" />
Usage:
somebooleanvar = Settings.Setting<bool>("Enabled");
somestringlvar = Settings.Setting<string>("ExportPath");
someintvar = Settings.Setting<int>("Seconds");
somedoublevar = Settings.Setting<double>("Ratio");
Credits to Shadow Wizard & MattC
5
votes
public class ConfigMan
{
#region Members
string _assemblyLocation;
Configuration _configuration;
#endregion Members
#region Constructors
/// <summary>
/// Loads config file settings for libraries that use assembly.dll.config files
/// </summary>
/// <param name="assemblyLocation">The full path or UNC location of the loaded file that contains the manifest.</param>
public ConfigMan(string assemblyLocation)
{
_assemblyLocation = assemblyLocation;
}
#endregion Constructors
#region Properties
Configuration Configuration
{
get
{
if (_configuration == null)
{
try
{
_configuration = ConfigurationManager.OpenExeConfiguration(_assemblyLocation);
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
}
}
return _configuration;
}
}
#endregion Properties
#region Methods
public string GetAppSetting(string key)
{
string result = string.Empty;
if (Configuration != null)
{
KeyValueConfigurationElement keyValueConfigurationElement = Configuration.AppSettings.Settings[key];
if (keyValueConfigurationElement != null)
{
string value = keyValueConfigurationElement.Value;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(value)) result = value;
}
}
return result;
}
#endregion Methods
}
Just for something to do, I refactored the top answer into a class. The usage is something like:
ConfigMan configMan = new ConfigMan(this.GetType().Assembly.Location);
var setting = configMan.GetAppSetting("AppSettingsKey");
4
votes
If you add Settings to a Class Library project in Visual Studio (Project Properties, Settings), it will add an app.config file to your project with the relevant userSettings/applicatioNSettings sections, and the default values for these settings from your Settings.settings file.
However this configuration file will not be used at runtime - instead the class library uses the configuration file of its hosting application.
I believe the main reason for generating this file is so that you can copy/paste the settings into the host application's configuration file.
2
votes
In response to the original question, I typically add the config file in my test project as a link; you can then use the DeploymentItem attribute to addit to the Out folder of the test run.
[TestClass]
[DeploymentItem("MyProject.Cache.dll.config")]
public class CacheTest
{
.
.
.
.
}
In response to the comments that Assemblies can't be project specific, they can and it provides great flexibility esp. when working with IOC frameworks.
2
votes
I faced the same problem and resolved it by creating a static class Parameters after adding an Application Configuration File to the project:
public static class Parameters
{
// For a Web Application
public static string PathConfig { get; private set; } =
Path.Combine(AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory, "web.config");
// For a Class Library
public static string PathConfig { get; private set; } =
Path.Combine(AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory, "bin", "LibraryName.dll.config");
public static string GetParameter(string paramName)
{
string paramValue = string.Empty;
using (Stream stream = File.OpenRead(PathConfig))
{
XDocument xdoc = XDocument.Load(stream);
XElement element = xdoc.Element("configuration").Element("appSettings").Elements().First(a => a.Attribute("key").Value == paramName);
paramValue = element.Attribute("value").Value;
}
return paramValue;
}
}
Then get a parameter like this:
Parameters.GetParameter("keyName");
1
votes
assemblies don't have their own app.config file. They use the app.config file of the application that is using them. So if your assembly is expecting certain things in the config file, then just make sure your application's config file has those entries in there.
If your assembly is being used by multiple applications then each of those applications will need to have those entries in their app.config file.
What I would recommended you do is define properties on the classes in your assembly for those values for example
private string ExternalServicesUrl
{
get
{
string externalServiceUrl = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["ExternalServicesUrl"];
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(externalServiceUrl))
throw new MissingConfigFileAppSettings("The Config file is missing the appSettings entry for: ExternalServicesUrl");
return externalServiceUrl;
}
}
Here, the property ExternalServicesUrl get's its value from the application's config file. If any application using this assembly is missing that setting in the config file you'll get an exception o it's clear that something went missing.
MissingConfigFileAppSettings is a custom Exception. You may want to throw a different exception.
Of course a better design would be for the method of those classes to be provided those values as parameters rather than relying on config file setting. That way the applications using these classes can decide from where and how they provide these values.
1
votes
1
votes
Preamble: I'm using NET 2.0;
The solution posted by Yiannis Leoussis is acceptable but I had some problem with it.
First, the static AppSettingsSection AppSettings = (AppSettingsSection)myDllConfig.GetSection("appSettings"); returns null. I had to change it to static AppSettingSection = myDllConfig.AppSettings;
Then the return (T)Convert.ChangeType(AppSettings.Settings[name].Value, typeof(T), nfi); doesn't have a catch for Exceptions. So I've changed it
try
{
return (T)Convert.ChangeType(AppSettings.Settings[name].Value, typeof(T), nfi);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
return default(T);
}
This works very well but if you have a different dll you have to rewrite every time the code for every assembly. So, this is my version for an Class to instantiate every time you need.
public class Settings
{
private AppSettingsSection _appSettings;
private NumberFormatInfo _nfi;
public Settings(Assembly currentAssembly)
{
UriBuilder uri = new UriBuilder(currentAssembly.CodeBase);
string configPath = Uri.UnescapeDataString(uri.Path);
Configuration myDllConfig = ConfigurationManager.OpenExeConfiguration(configPath);
_appSettings = myDllConfig.AppSettings;
_nfi = new NumberFormatInfo()
{
NumberGroupSeparator = "",
CurrencyDecimalSeparator = "."
};
}
public T Setting<T>(string name)
{
try
{
return (T)Convert.ChangeType(_appSettings.Settings[name].Value, typeof(T), _nfi);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
return default(T);
}
}
}
For a config:
<add key="Enabled" value="true" />
<add key="ExportPath" value="c:\" />
<add key="Seconds" value="25" />
<add key="Ratio" value="0.14" />
Use it as:
Settings _setting = new Settings(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly());
somebooleanvar = _settings.Setting<bool>("Enabled");
somestringlvar = _settings.Setting<string>("ExportPath");
someintvar = _settings.Setting<int>("Seconds");
somedoublevar = _settings.Setting<double>("Ratio");
1
votes
0
votes
0
votes
use from configurations must be very very easy like this :
var config = new MiniConfig("setting.conf");
config.AddOrUpdate("port", "1580");
if (config.TryGet("port", out int port)) // if config exist
{
Console.Write(port);
}
for more details see MiniConfig
0
votes
I took a look at the AppDomain instead of the assembly. This has the benefit of working inside static methods of a library. Link seems to work great for getting the key value as suggested by the other answers here.
public class DLLConfig
{
public static string GetSettingByKey(AppDomain currentDomain, string configName, string key)
{
string value = string.Empty;
try
{
string exeConfigPath = (currentDomain.RelativeSearchPath ?? currentDomain.BaseDirectory) + "\\" + configName;
if (File.Exists(exeConfigPath))
{
using (Stream stream = File.OpenRead(exeConfigPath))
{
XDocument xdoc = XDocument.Load(stream);
XElement element = xdoc.Element("configuration").Element("appSettings").Elements().First(a => a.Attribute("key").Value == key);
value = element.Attribute("value").Value;
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
}
return value;
}
}
Use it within your library class like so;
namespace ProjectName
{
public class ClassName
{
public static string SomeStaticMethod()
{
string value = DLLConfig.GetSettingByKey(AppDomain.CurrentDomain,"ProjectName.dll.config", "keyname");
}
}
}
