There are several issues with most solutions on the internet. So I decided to make a follow-up, which includes, why the accepted answer shouldn't be accepted.
starting situation
I want to deep-copy a Javascript Object
with all of its children and their children and so on. But since I'm not kind of a normal developer, my Object
has normal properties
, circular structures
and even nested objects
.
So let's create a circular structure
and a nested object
first.
function Circ() {
this.me = this;
}
function Nested(y) {
this.y = y;
}
Let's bring everything together in an Object
named a
.
var a = {
x: 'a',
circ: new Circ(),
nested: new Nested('a')
};
Next, we want to copy a
into a variable named b
and mutate it.
var b = a;
b.x = 'b';
b.nested.y = 'b';
You know what happened here because if not you wouldn't even land on this great question.
console.log(a, b);
a --> Object {
x: "b",
circ: Circ {
me: Circ { ... }
},
nested: Nested {
y: "b"
}
}
b --> Object {
x: "b",
circ: Circ {
me: Circ { ... }
},
nested: Nested {
y: "b"
}
}
Now let's find a solution.
JSON
The first attempt I tried was using JSON
.
var b = JSON.parse( JSON.stringify( a ) );
b.x = 'b';
b.nested.y = 'b';
Don't waste too much time on it, you'll get TypeError: Converting circular structure to JSON
.
Recursive copy (the accepted "answer")
Let's have a look at the accepted answer.
function cloneSO(obj) {
// Handle the 3 simple types, and null or undefined
if (null == obj || "object" != typeof obj) return obj;
// Handle Date
if (obj instanceof Date) {
var copy = new Date();
copy.setTime(obj.getTime());
return copy;
}
// Handle Array
if (obj instanceof Array) {
var copy = [];
for (var i = 0, len = obj.length; i < len; i++) {
copy[i] = cloneSO(obj[i]);
}
return copy;
}
// Handle Object
if (obj instanceof Object) {
var copy = {};
for (var attr in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(attr)) copy[attr] = cloneSO(obj[attr]);
}
return copy;
}
throw new Error("Unable to copy obj! Its type isn't supported.");
}
Looks good, heh? It's a recursive copy of the object and handles other types as well, like Date
, but that wasn't a requirement.
var b = cloneSO(a);
b.x = 'b';
b.nested.y = 'b';
Recursion and circular structures
doesn't work well together... RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded
native solution
After arguing with my co-worker, my boss asked us what happened, and he found a simple solution after some googling. It's called Object.create
.
var b = Object.create(a);
b.x = 'b';
b.nested.y = 'b';
This solution was added to Javascript some time ago and even handles circular structure
.
console.log(a, b);
a --> Object {
x: "a",
circ: Circ {
me: Circ { ... }
},
nested: Nested {
y: "b"
}
}
b --> Object {
x: "b",
circ: Circ {
me: Circ { ... }
},
nested: Nested {
y: "b"
}
}
... and you see, it didn't work with the nested structure inside.
polyfill for the native solution
There's a polyfill for Object.create
in the older browser just like the IE 8. It's something like recommended by Mozilla, and of course, it's not perfect and results in the same problem as the native solution.
function F() {};
function clonePF(o) {
F.prototype = o;
return new F();
}
var b = clonePF(a);
b.x = 'b';
b.nested.y = 'b';
I've put F
outside the scope so we can have a look at what instanceof
tells us.
console.log(a, b);
a --> Object {
x: "a",
circ: Circ {
me: Circ { ... }
},
nested: Nested {
y: "b"
}
}
b --> F {
x: "b",
circ: Circ {
me: Circ { ... }
},
nested: Nested {
y: "b"
}
}
console.log(typeof a, typeof b);
a --> object
b --> object
console.log(a instanceof Object, b instanceof Object);
a --> true
b --> true
console.log(a instanceof F, b instanceof F);
a --> false
b --> true
Same problem as the native solution, but a little bit worse output.
the better (but not perfect) solution
When digging around, I found a similar question (In Javascript, when performing a deep copy, how do I avoid a cycle, due to a property being "this"?) to this one, but with a way better solution.
function cloneDR(o) {
const gdcc = "__getDeepCircularCopy__";
if (o !== Object(o)) {
return o; // primitive value
}
var set = gdcc in o,
cache = o[gdcc],
result;
if (set && typeof cache == "function") {
return cache();
}
// else
o[gdcc] = function() { return result; }; // overwrite
if (o instanceof Array) {
result = [];
for (var i=0; i<o.length; i++) {
result[i] = cloneDR(o[i]);
}
} else {
result = {};
for (var prop in o)
if (prop != gdcc)
result[prop] = cloneDR(o[prop]);
else if (set)
result[prop] = cloneDR(cache);
}
if (set) {
o[gdcc] = cache; // reset
} else {
delete o[gdcc]; // unset again
}
return result;
}
var b = cloneDR(a);
b.x = 'b';
b.nested.y = 'b';
And let's have a look at the output...
console.log(a, b);
a --> Object {
x: "a",
circ: Object {
me: Object { ... }
},
nested: Object {
y: "a"
}
}
b --> Object {
x: "b",
circ: Object {
me: Object { ... }
},
nested: Object {
y: "b"
}
}
console.log(typeof a, typeof b);
a --> object
b --> object
console.log(a instanceof Object, b instanceof Object);
a --> true
b --> true
console.log(a instanceof F, b instanceof F);
a --> false
b --> false
The requirements are matched, but there are still some smaller issues, including changing the instance
of nested
and circ
to Object
.
The structure of trees that share a leaf won't be copied, they will become two independent leaves:
[Object] [Object]
/ \ / \
/ \ / \
|/_ _\| |/_ _\|
[Object] [Object] ===> [Object] [Object]
\ / | |
\ / | |
_\| |/_ \|/ \|/
[Object] [Object] [Object]
conclusion
The last solution using recursion and a cache, may not be the best, but it's a real deep-copy of the object. It handles simple properties
, circular structures
and nested object
, but it will mess up the instance of them while cloning.
jsfiddle
mObj=JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(jsonObject));
– Lord Loh.Object.create(o)
, it does everything the author asks? – froginvasionvar x = { deep: { key: 1 } }; var y = Object.create(x); x.deep.key = 2;
After doing this,y.deep.key
will also be 2, hence Object.create CAN NOT BE USED for cloning... – Ruben Stolk