It's possible to represent pretty much any type you want. But since monadic operations are implemented differently for every type, it is not possible to write >>=
once and have it work for every instance.
However, you can write generic functions that depend on evidence of the instance of the typeclass. Consider e
here to be a tuple, where fst e
contains a "bind" definition, and snd e
contains a "return" definition.
bind = λe. fst e -- after applying evidence, bind looks like λmf. ___
return = λe. snd e -- after applying evidence, return looks like λx. ___
fst = λt. t true
snd = λt. t false
-- join x = x >>= id
join = λex. bind e x (λz. z)
-- liftM f m1 = do { x1 <- m1; return (f x1) }
-- m1 >>= \x1 -> return (f x1)
liftM = λefm. bind e m (λx. return e (f x))
You would then have to define an "evidence tuple" for every instance of Monad. Notice that the way we defined bind
and return
: they work just like the other "generic" Monad methods we have defined: they must first be given evidence of Monad-ness, and then they function as expected.
We can represent Maybe
as a function that takes 2 inputs, the first is a function to perform if it is Just x
, and the second is a value to replace it with if it is Nothing.
just = λxfz. f x
nothing = λfz. z
-- bind and return for maybes
bindMaybe = λmf. m f nothing
returnMaybe = just
maybeMonadEvidence = tuple bindMaybe returnMaybe
Lists are similar, represent a List as its folding function. Therefore, a list is a function that takes 2 inputs, a "cons" and an "empty". It then performs foldr myCons myEmpty
on the list.
nil = λcz. z
cons = λhtcz. c h (t c z)
bindList = λmf. concat (map f m)
returnList = λx. cons x nil
listMonadEvidence = tuple bindList returnList
-- concat = foldr (++) []
concat = λl. l append nil
-- append xs ys = foldr (:) ys xs
append = λxy. x cons y
-- map f = foldr ((:) . f) []
map = λfl. l (λx. cons (f x)) nil
Either
is also straightforward. Represent an either type as a function that takes two functions: one to apply if it is a Left
, and another to apply if it is a Right
.
left = λlfg. f l
right = λrfg. g r
-- Left l >>= f = Left l
-- Right r >>= f = f r
bindEither = λmf. m left f
returnEither = right
eitherMonadEvidence = tuple bindEither returnEither
Don't forget, functions themselves (a ->)
form a monad. And everything in the lambda calculus is a function...so...don't think about it too hard. ;) Inspired directly from the source of Control.Monad.Instances
-- f >>= k = \ r -> k (f r) r
bindFunc = λfkr. k (f r) r
-- return = const
returnFunc = λxy. x
funcMonadEvidence = tuple bindFunc returnFunc