154
votes

I have a method for getting users from a database with JDBC:

public List<User> getUser(int userId) {
    String sql = "SELECT id, name FROM users WHERE id = ?";
    List<User> users = new ArrayList<User>();
    try {
        Connection con = DriverManager.getConnection(myConnectionURL);
        PreparedStatement ps = con.prepareStatement(sql); 
        ps.setInt(1, userId);
        ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery();
        while(rs.next()) {
            users.add(new User(rs.getInt("id"), rs.getString("name")));
        }
        rs.close();
        ps.close();
        con.close();
    } catch (SQLException e) {
        e.printStackTrace();
    }
    return users;
}

How should I use Java 7 try-with-resources to improve this code?

I have tried with the code below, but it uses many try blocks, and doesn't improve the readability much. Should I use try-with-resources in another way?

public List<User> getUser(int userId) {
    String sql = "SELECT id, name FROM users WHERE id = ?";
    List<User> users = new ArrayList<>();
    try {
        try (Connection con = DriverManager.getConnection(myConnectionURL);
             PreparedStatement ps = con.prepareStatement(sql);) {
            ps.setInt(1, userId);
            try (ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery();) {
                while(rs.next()) {
                    users.add(new User(rs.getInt("id"), rs.getString("name")));
                }
            }
        }
    } catch (SQLException e) {
        e.printStackTrace();
    }
    return users;
}
5
In your second example, you don't need the inner try (ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery()) { because A ResultSet object is automatically closed by the Statement object that generated itAlexander Farber
@AlexanderFarber Unfortunately, there have been notorious problems with drivers that failed to close resources on their own. The School of Hard Knocks teaches us to always close all the JDBC resources explicitly, made easier using try-with-resources around Connection, PreparedStatement, and ResultSet too. No reason not to really, as the try-with-resources makes it so easy and makes our code more self-documenting as to our intentions.Basil Bourque

5 Answers

95
votes

There's no need for the outer try in your example, so you can at least go down from 3 to 2, and also you don't need closing ; at the end of the resource list. The advantage of using two try blocks is that all of your code is present up front so you don't have to refer to a separate method:

public List<User> getUser(int userId) {
    String sql = "SELECT id, username FROM users WHERE id = ?";
    List<User> users = new ArrayList<>();
    try (Connection con = DriverManager.getConnection(myConnectionURL);
         PreparedStatement ps = con.prepareStatement(sql)) {
        ps.setInt(1, userId);
        try (ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery()) {
            while(rs.next()) {
                users.add(new User(rs.getInt("id"), rs.getString("name")));
            }
        }
    } catch (SQLException e) {
        e.printStackTrace();
    }
    return users;
}
191
votes

I realize this was long ago answered but want to suggest an additional approach that avoids the nested try-with-resources double block.

public List<User> getUser(int userId) {
    try (Connection con = DriverManager.getConnection(myConnectionURL);
         PreparedStatement ps = createPreparedStatement(con, userId); 
         ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery()) {

         // process the resultset here, all resources will be cleaned up

    } catch (SQLException e) {
        e.printStackTrace();
    }
}

private PreparedStatement createPreparedStatement(Connection con, int userId) throws SQLException {
    String sql = "SELECT id, username FROM users WHERE id = ?";
    PreparedStatement ps = con.prepareStatement(sql);
    ps.setInt(1, userId);
    return ps;
}
5
votes

As others have stated, your code is basically correct though the outer try is unneeded. Here are a few more thoughts.

DataSource

Other answers here are correct and good, such the accepted Answer by bpgergo. But none of the show the use of DataSource, commonly recommended over use of DriverManager in modern Java.

So for the sake of completeness, here is a complete example that fetches the current date from the database server. The database used here is Postgres. Any other database would work similarly. You would replace the use of org.postgresql.ds.PGSimpleDataSource with an implementation of DataSource appropriate to your database. An implementation is likely provided by your particular driver, or connection pool if you go that route.

A DataSource implementation need not be closed, because it is never “opened”. A DataSource is not a resource, is not connected to the database, so it is not holding networking connections nor resources on the database server. A DataSource is simply information needed when making a connection to the database, with the database server's network name or address, the user name, user password, and various options you want specified when a connection is eventually made. So your DataSource implementation object does not go inside your try-with-resources parentheses.

Nested try-with-resources

Your code makes proper used of nested try-with-resources statements.

Notice in the example code below that we also use the try-with-resources syntax twice, one nested inside the other. The outer try defines two resources: Connection and PreparedStatement. The inner try defines the ResultSet resource. This is a common code structure.

If an exception is thrown from the inner one, and not caught there, the ResultSet resource will automatically be closed (if it exists, is not null). Following that, the PreparedStatement will be closed, and lastly the Connection is closed. Resources are automatically closed in reverse order in which they were declared within the try-with-resource statements.

The example code here is overly simplistic. As written, it could be executed with a single try-with-resources statement. But in a real work you will likely be doing more work between the nested pair of try calls. For example, you may be extracting values from your user-interface or a POJO, and then passing those to fulfill ? placeholders within your SQL via calls to PreparedStatement::set… methods.

Syntax notes

Trailing semicolon

Notice that the semicolon trailing the last resource statement within the parentheses of the try-with-resources is optional. I include it in my own work for two reasons: Consistency and it looks complete, and it makes copy-pasting a mix of lines easier without having to worry about end-of-line semicolons. Your IDE may flag the last semicolon as superfluous, but there is no harm in leaving it.

Java 9 – Use existing vars in try-with-resources

New in Java 9 is an enhancement to try-with-resources syntax. We can now declare and populate the resources outside the parentheses of the try statement. I have not yet found this useful for JDBC resources, but keep it in mind in your own work.

ResultSet should close itself, but may not

In an ideal world the ResultSet would close itself as the documentation promises:

A ResultSet object is automatically closed when the Statement object that generated it is closed, re-executed, or used to retrieve the next result from a sequence of multiple results.

Unfortunately, in the past some JDBC drivers infamously failed to fulfill this promise. As a result, many JDBC programmers learned to explicitly close all their JDBC resources including Connection, PreparedStatement, and ResultSet too. The modern try-with-resources syntax has made doing so easier, and with more compact code. Notice that the Java team went to the bother of marking ResultSet as AutoCloseable, and I suggest we make use of that. Using a try-with-resources around all your JDBC resources makes your code more self-documenting as to your intentions.

Code example

package work.basil.example;

import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.PreparedStatement;
import java.sql.ResultSet;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import java.time.LocalDate;
import java.util.Objects;

public class App
{
    public static void main ( String[] args )
    {
        App app = new App();
        app.doIt();
    }

    private void doIt ( )
    {
        System.out.println( "Hello World!" );

        org.postgresql.ds.PGSimpleDataSource dataSource = new org.postgresql.ds.PGSimpleDataSource();

        dataSource.setServerName( "1.2.3.4" );
        dataSource.setPortNumber( 5432 );

        dataSource.setDatabaseName( "example_db_" );
        dataSource.setUser( "scott" );
        dataSource.setPassword( "tiger" );

        dataSource.setApplicationName( "ExampleApp" );

        System.out.println( "INFO - Attempting to connect to database: " );
        if ( Objects.nonNull( dataSource ) )
        {
            String sql = "SELECT CURRENT_DATE ;";
            try (
                    Connection conn = dataSource.getConnection() ;
                    PreparedStatement ps = conn.prepareStatement( sql ) ;
            )
            {
                … make `PreparedStatement::set…` calls here.
                try (
                        ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery() ;
                )
                {
                    if ( rs.next() )
                    {
                        LocalDate ld = rs.getObject( 1 , LocalDate.class );
                        System.out.println( "INFO - date is " + ld );
                    }
                }
            }
            catch ( SQLException e )
            {
                e.printStackTrace();
            }
        }

        System.out.println( "INFO - all done." );
    }
}
4
votes

What about creating an additional wrapper class?

package com.naveen.research.sql;

import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.PreparedStatement;
import java.sql.ResultSet;
import java.sql.SQLException;

public abstract class PreparedStatementWrapper implements AutoCloseable {

    protected PreparedStatement stat;

    public PreparedStatementWrapper(Connection con, String query, Object ... params) throws SQLException {
        this.stat = con.prepareStatement(query);
        this.prepareStatement(params);
    }

    protected abstract void prepareStatement(Object ... params) throws SQLException;

    public ResultSet executeQuery() throws SQLException {
        return this.stat.executeQuery();
    }

    public int executeUpdate() throws SQLException {
        return this.stat.executeUpdate();
    }

    @Override
    public void close() {
        try {
            this.stat.close();
        } catch (SQLException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }
}


Then in the calling class you can implement prepareStatement method as:

try (Connection con = DriverManager.getConnection(JDBC_URL, prop);
    PreparedStatementWrapper stat = new PreparedStatementWrapper(con, query,
                new Object[] { 123L, "TEST" }) {
            @Override
            protected void prepareStatement(Object... params) throws SQLException {
                stat.setLong(1, Long.class.cast(params[0]));
                stat.setString(2, String.valueOf(params[1]));
            }
        };
        ResultSet rs = stat.executeQuery();) {
    while (rs.next())
        System.out.println(String.format("%s, %s", rs.getString(2), rs.getString(1)));
} catch (SQLException e) {
    e.printStackTrace();
}

3
votes

Here is a concise way using lambdas and JDK 8 Supplier to fit everything in the outer try:

try (Connection con = DriverManager.getConnection(JDBC_URL, prop);
    PreparedStatement stmt = ((Supplier<PreparedStatement>)() -> {
    try {
        PreparedStatement s = con.prepareStatement("SELECT userid, name, features FROM users WHERE userid = ?");
        s.setInt(1, userid);
        return s;
    } catch (SQLException e) { throw new RuntimeException(e); }
    }).get();
    ResultSet resultSet = stmt.executeQuery()) {
}