Why is null
considered an object
in JavaScript?
Is checking
if ( object == null )
Do something
the same as
if ( !object )
Do something
?
And also:
What is the difference between null
and undefined
?
(name is undefined)
You: What is name
? (*)
JavaScript: name
? What's a name
? I don't know what you're talking about. You haven't ever mentioned any name
before. Are you seeing some other scripting language on the (client-)side?
name = null;
You: What is name
?
JavaScript: I don't know.
In short; undefined
is where no notion of the thing exists; it has no type, and it's never been referenced before in that scope; null
is where the thing is known to exist, but it's not known what the value is.
One thing to remember is that null
is not, conceptually, the same as false
or ""
or such, even if they equate after type casting, i.e.
name = false;
You: What is name
?
JavaScript: Boolean false.
name = '';
You: What is name
?
JavaScript: Empty string
*: name
in this context is meant as a variable which has never been defined. It could be any undefined variable, however, name is a property of just about any HTML form element. It goes way, way back and was instituted well before id. It is useful because ids must be unique but names do not have to be.
The difference can be summarized into this snippet:
alert(typeof(null)); // object
alert(typeof(undefined)); // undefined
alert(null !== undefined) //true
alert(null == undefined) //true
Checking
object == null
is different to check if ( !object )
.
The latter is equal to ! Boolean(object)
, because the unary !
operator automatically cast the right operand into a Boolean.
Since Boolean(null)
equals false then !false === true
.
So if your object is not null, but false or 0 or "", the check will pass because:
alert(Boolean(null)) //false
alert(Boolean(0)) //false
alert(Boolean("")) //false
null
is not an object, it is a primitive value. For example, you cannot add properties to it. Sometimes people wrongly assume that it is an object, because typeof null
returns "object"
. But that is actually a bug (that might even be fixed in ECMAScript 6).
The difference between null
and undefined
is as follows:
undefined
: used by JavaScript and means “no value”. Uninitialized variables, missing parameters and unknown variables have that value.
> var noValueYet;
> console.log(noValueYet);
undefined
> function foo(x) { console.log(x) }
> foo()
undefined
> var obj = {};
> console.log(obj.unknownProperty)
undefined
Accessing unknown variables, however, produces an exception:
> unknownVariable
ReferenceError: unknownVariable is not defined
null
: used by programmers to indicate “no value”, e.g. as a parameter to a function.
Examining a variable:
console.log(typeof unknownVariable === "undefined"); // true
var foo;
console.log(typeof foo === "undefined"); // true
console.log(foo === undefined); // true
var bar = null;
console.log(bar === null); // true
As a general rule, you should always use === and never == in JavaScript (== performs all kinds of conversions that can produce unexpected results). The check x == null
is an edge case, because it works for both null
and undefined
:
> null == null
true
> undefined == null
true
A common way of checking whether a variable has a value is to convert it to boolean and see whether it is true
. That conversion is performed by the if
statement and the boolean operator ! (“not”).
function foo(param) {
if (param) {
// ...
}
}
function foo(param) {
if (! param) param = "abc";
}
function foo(param) {
// || returns first operand that can't be converted to false
param = param || "abc";
}
Drawback of this approach: All of the following values evaluate to false
, so you have to be careful (e.g., the above checks can’t distinguish between undefined
and 0
).
undefined
, null
false
+0
, -0
, NaN
""
You can test the conversion to boolean by using Boolean
as a function (normally it is a constructor, to be used with new
):
> Boolean(null)
false
> Boolean("")
false
> Boolean(3-3)
false
> Boolean({})
true
> Boolean([])
true
What is the difference between null and undefined??
A property when it has no definition, is undefined. null is an object. Its type is object. null is a special value meaning "no value. undefined is not an object, it's type is undefined.
You can declare a variable, set it to null, and the behavior is identical except that you'll see "null" printed out versus "undefined". You can even compare a variable that is undefined to null or vice versa, and the condition will be true:
undefined == null
null == undefined
Refer to JavaScript Difference between null and undefined for more detail.
and with your new edit yes
if (object == null) does mean the same if(!object)
when testing if object is false, they both only meet the condition when testing if false, but not when true
Check here: Javascript gotcha
First part of the question:
Why is null considered an object in JavaScript?
It is a JavaScript design error they can't fix now. It should have been type null, not type object, or not have it at all. It necessitates an extra check (sometimes forgotten) when detecting real objects and is source of bugs.
Second part of the question:
Is checking
if (object == null)
Do something
the same asif (!object)
Do something
The two checks are always both false except for:
object is undefined or null: both true.
object is primitive, and 0, ""
, or false: first check false, second true.
If the object is not a primitive, but a real Object, like new Number(0)
, new String("")
, or new Boolean(false)
, then both checks are false.
So if 'object' is interpreted to mean a real Object then both checks are always the same. If primitives are allowed then the checks are different for 0, ""
, and false.
In cases like object==null
, the unobvious results could be a source of bugs. Use of ==
is not recommended ever, use ===
instead.
Third part of the question:
And also:
What is the difference between null and undefined?
In JavaScript, one difference is that null is of type object and undefined is of type undefined.
In JavaScript, null==undefined
is true, and considered equal if type is ignored. Why they decided that, but 0, ""
and false aren't equal, I don't know. It seems to be an arbitrary opinion.
In JavaScript, null===undefined
is not true since the type must be the same in ===
.
In reality, null and undefined are identical, since they both represent non-existence. So do 0, and ""
for that matter too, and maybe the empty containers []
and {}
. So many types of the same nothing are a recipe for bugs. One type or none at all is better. I would try to use as few as possible.
'false', 'true', and '!' are another bag of worms that could be simplified, for example, if(!x)
and if(x)
alone are sufficient, you don't need true and false.
A declared var x
is type undefined if no value is given, but it should be the same as if x was never declared at all. Another bug source is an empty nothing container. So it is best to declare and define it together, like var x=1
.
People are going round and round in circles trying to figure out all these various types of nothing, but it's all just the same thing in complicated different clothes. The reality is
undefined===undeclared===null===0===""===[]==={}===nothing
And maybe all should throw exceptions.
typeof null; // object
typeof undefined; // undefined
The value null represents the intentional absence of any object value. It is one of JavaScript's primitive values and is treated as falsy for boolean operations.
var x = null;
var y;
x is declared & defined as null
y is declared but not defined. It is declared with no value so it is undefined.
z is not declared so would also be undefined if you attempted to use z.
One way to make sense of null and undefined is to understand where each occurs.
Expect a null return value in the following situations:
Methods that query the DOM
console.log(window.document.getElementById("nonExistentElement"));
//Prints: null
JSON responses received from an Ajax request
{
name: "Bob",
address: null
}
New functionality that is in a state of flux. The following returns null:
var proto = Object.getPrototypeOf(Object.getPrototypeOf({}));
// But this returns undefined:
Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor({}, "a");
All other cases of non-existence are denoted by undefined (as noted by @Axel). Each of the following prints "undefined":
var uninitalised;
console.log(uninitalised);
var obj = {};
console.log(obj.nonExistent);
function missingParam(missing){
console.log(missing);
}
missingParam();
var arr = [];
console.log(arr.pop());
Of course if you decide to write var unitialised = null; or return null from a method yourself then you have null occurring in other situations. But that should be pretty obvious.
A third case is when you want to access a variable but you don't even know if it has been declared. For that case use typeof to avoid a reference error:
if(typeof unknown !== "undefined"){
//use unknown
}
In summary check for null when you are manipulating the DOM, dealing with Ajax, or using certain ECMAScript 5 features. For all other cases it is safe to check for undefined with strict equality:
if(value === undefined){
// stuff
}
Comparison of many different null checks in JavaScript:
http://jsfiddle.net/aaronhoffman/DdRHB/5/
// Variables to test
var myNull = null;
var myObject = {};
var myStringEmpty = "";
var myStringWhiteSpace = " ";
var myStringHello = "hello";
var myIntZero = 0;
var myIntOne = 1;
var myBoolTrue = true;
var myBoolFalse = false;
var myUndefined;
...trim...
http://aaron-hoffman.blogspot.com/2013/04/javascript-null-checking-undefined-and.html
To add to the answer of What is the differrence between undefined
and null
, from JavaScript Definitive Guide 6th Edition, p.41 on this page:
You might consider
undefined
to represent system-level, unexpected, or error-like absense of value andnull
to represent program-level, normal, or expected absence of value. If you need to assign one of these values to a variable or property or pass one of these values to a function,null
is almost always the right choice.
TLDR
undefined
is a primitive value in JavaScript that indicates the implicit absence of a value. Uninitialized variables automatically have this value, and functions without an explicit return
statement, return undefined
.
null
is also a primitive value in JavaScript. It indicates the intentional absence of an object value. null
in JavaScript was designed to enable interoperability with Java.
typeof null
returns "object"
because of a peculiarity in the design of the language, stemming from the demand that JavaScript be interoperable with Java. It does not mean null
is an instance of an object. It means: given the tree of primitive types in JavaScript, null
is part of the "object-type primitive" subtree. This is explained more fully below.
Details
undefined
is a primitive value that represents the implicit absence of a value. Note that undefined
was not directly accessible until JavaScript 1.3 in 1998. This tells us that null
was intended to be the value used by programmers when explicitly indicating the absence of a value. Uninitialized variables automatically have the value undefined
. undefined
is a one-of-a-kind type in the ECMAScript specification.
null
is a primitive value that represents the intentional absence of an object value. null
is also a one-of-a-kind type in the ECMAScript specification.
null
in JavaScript was designed with a view to enable interoperability with Java, both from a "look" perspective, and from a programatic perspective (eg the LiveConnect Java/JS bridge planned for 1996). Both Brendan Eich and others have since expressed distaste at the inclusion of two "absence of value" values, but in 1995 Eich was under orders to "make [JavaScript] look like Java".
If I didn't have "Make it look like Java" as an order from management, and I had more time (hard to unconfound these two causal factors), then I would have preferred a Self-like "everything's an object" approach: no Boolean, Number, String wrappers. No undefined and null. Sigh.
In order to accommodate Java's concept of null
which, due to the strongly-typed nature of Java, can only be assigned to variables typed to a reference type (rather primitives), Eich chose to position the special null
value at the top of the object prototype chain (ie. the top of the reference types), and to include the null
type as part of the set of "object-type primitives".
The typeof
operator was added shortly thereafter in JavaScript 1.1, released on 19th August 1996.
From the V8 blog:
typeof null
returnsobject
, and notnull
, despitenull
being a type of its own. To understand why, consider that the set of all JavaScript types is divided into two groups:
- objects (i.e. the Object type)
- primitives (i.e. any non-object value)
As such,
null
means “no object value”, whereasundefined
means “no value”.
Following this line of thought, Brendan Eich designed JavaScript to make
typeof
return 'object' for all values on the right-hand side, i.e. all objects and null values, in the spirit of Java. That’s whytypeof null === 'object'
despite the spec having a separatenull
type.
So Eich designed the heirarchy of primitive types to enable interoperability with Java. This led to him positioning null
along with the "object-type primitives" on the heirarchy. To refelct this, when typeof
was added to the language shortly thereafter, he chose typeof null
to return "object"
.
The surprise expressed by JavaScript developers at typeof null === "object"
is the result of an impedance mismatch (or abstraction leak) between a weakly-typed language (JavaScript) that has both null
and undefined
, and another, strongly-typed language (Java) that only has null
, and in which null
is strictly defined to refer to a reference type (not a primitive type).
Note that this is all logical, reasonable and defensible. typeof null === "object"
is not a bug, but a second-order effect of having to accommodate Java interoperability.
A number of imperfect backwards rationalisations and/or conventions have emerged, including that undefined
indicates implicit absence of a value, and that null
indicates intentional absence of a value; or that undefined
is the absence of a value, and null
is specifically the absence of an object value.
A relevant conversation with Brendan Eich, screenshotted for posterity:
null and undefined are both false for value equality (null==undefined): they both collapse to boolean false. They are not the same object (null!==undefined).
undefined is a property of the global object ("window" in browsers), but is a primitive type and not an object itself. It's the default value for uninitialized variables and functions ending without a return statement.
null is an instance of Object. null is used for DOM methods that return collection objects to indicate an empty result, which provides a false value without indicating an error.
Some precisions:
null and undefined are two different values. One is representing the absence of a value for a name and the other is representing the absence of a name.
What happens in an if
goes as follows for if( o )
:
The expression in the parentheses o is evaluated, and then the if
kicks in type-coercing the value of the expression in the parentheses - in our case o
.
Falsy (that will get coerced to false) values in JavaScript are: '', null, undefined, 0, and false.
The following function shows why and is capable for working out the difference:
function test() {
var myObj = {};
console.log(myObj.myProperty);
myObj.myProperty = null;
console.log(myObj.myProperty);
}
If you call
test();
You're getting
undefined
null
The first console.log(...)
tries to get myProperty
from myObj
while it is not yet defined - so it gets back "undefined". After assigning null to it, the second console.log(...)
returns obviously "null" because myProperty
exists, but it has the value null
assigned to it.
In order to be able to query this difference, JavaScript has null
and undefined
: While null
is - just like in other languages an object, undefined
cannot be an object because there is no instance (even not a null
instance) available.
Look at this:
<script>
function f(a){
alert(typeof(a));
if (a==null) alert('null');
a?alert(true):alert(false);
}
</script>
//return:
<button onclick="f()">nothing</button> //undefined null false
<button onclick="f(null)">null</button> //object null false
<button onclick="f('')">empty</button> //string false
<button onclick="f(0)">zero</button> //number false
<button onclick="f(1)">int</button> //number true
<button onclick="f('x')">str</button> //string true
From "The Principles of Object-Oriented Javascript" by Nicholas C. Zakas
But why an object when the type is null? (In fact, this has been acknowledged as an error by TC39, the committee that designs and maintains JavaScript. You could reason that null is an empty object pointer, making "object" a logical return value, but that’s still confusing.)
Zakas, Nicholas C. (2014-02-07). The Principles of Object-Oriented JavaScript (Kindle Locations 226-227). No Starch Press. Kindle Edition.
That said:
var game = null; //typeof(game) is "object"
game.score = 100;//null is not an object, what the heck!?
game instanceof Object; //false, so it's not an instance but it's type is object
//let's make this primitive variable an object;
game = {};
typeof(game);//it is an object
game instanceof Object; //true, yay!!!
game.score = 100;
Undefined case:
var score; //at this point 'score' is undefined
typeof(score); //'undefined'
var score.player = "felix"; //'undefined' is not an object
score instanceof Object; //false, oh I already knew that.
The best way to think about 'null' is to recall how the similar concept is used in databases, where it indicates that a field contains "no value at all."
This is a very useful technique for writing programs that are more-easily debugged. An 'undefined' variable might be the result of a bug ... (how would you know?) ... but if the variable contains the value 'null,' you know that "someone, somewhere in this program, set it to 'null.'" Therefore, I suggest that, when you need to get rid of the value of a variable, don't "delete" ... set it to 'null.' The old value will be orphaned and soon will be garbage-collected; the new value is, "there is no value (now)." In both cases, the variable's state is certain: "it obviously, deliberately, got that way."
2.Undefined is a type itself while Null is an object.
3.Javascript can itself initialize any unassigned variable to undefined but it can never set value of a variable to null. This has to be done programatically.
Use null to define something as having no value, use undefined when you expect something might not be defined at all.
For example, if a variable has no value, assign it as null.
var weDontHaveAValue = null;
If you expect that something might be not defined at all, e.g. an optional options argument, use undefined.
if (typeof args.optionalParam !== 'undefined') { }
typeof null === 'object'
but that's a bug! Here's a link Watch all the videos and enjoy :) – CoR