Does it matter which way I declare the main
function in a C++ (or C) program?
8 Answers
The difference is one is the correct way to define main
, and the other is not.
And yes, it does matter. Either
int main(int argc, char** argv)
or
int main()
are the proper definition of your main
per the C++ spec.
void main(int argc, char** argv)
is not and was, IIRC, a perversity that came with older Microsoft's C++ compilers.
Bjarne Stroustrup made this quite clear:
The definition
void main()
is not and never has been C++, nor has it even been C.
See reference.
A long time ago I found this page (void main(void)) which contained many reasons outside of the "the standard says it is not valid" argument. On particular operating systems/architectures it could cause the stack to become corrupted and or other nasty things to happen.
In C++, main()
must return int
. However, C99 allows main()
to have a non-int
return type. Here is the excerpt from the C99 standard.
5.1.2.2.1 Program startup
The function called at program startup is named main. The implementation declares no prototype for this function. It shall be defined with a return type of int and with no parameters:
int main(void) { /* ... */ }
or with two parameters (referred to here as argc and argv, though any names may be used, as they are local to the function in which they are declared):
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { /* ... */ }
or equivalent; or in some other implementation-defined manner.
Also note that gcc does compile void main()
although practically, it does a return 0;
on encountering a closing brace.