Short answer: you can't. The KeyPath
abstraction is designed to encapsulate a potentially nested property key path from a given root type. As such, exporting a single String
value might not make sense in the general case.
For instance, should the hypothetically exported string be interpreted as a property of the root type or a member of one of its nested types? At the very least a string array would need to be exported to address such scenarios...
Per type workaround. Having said that, given that KeyPath
conforms to the Equatable
protocol, you can provide a custom, per type solution yourself. For instance:
struct Auth {
var email: String
var password: String
}
struct User {
var name: String
var auth: Auth
}
provide an extension for User
-based key paths:
extension PartialKeyPath where Root == User {
var stringValue: String {
switch self {
case \User.name: return "name"
case \User.auth: return "auth"
case \User.auth.email: return "auth.email"
case \User.auth.password: return "auth.password"
default: fatalError("Unexpected key path")
}
}
usage:
let name: KeyPath<User, String> = \User.name
let email: KeyPath<User, String> = \User.auth.email
print(name.stringValue) /* name */
print(email.stringValue) /* auth.email */
I wouldn't really recommend this solution for production code, given the somewhat high maintenance, etc. But since you were curious this, at least, gives you a way forward ;)