Can LoadRunner Receive Data By UDP Packets?

1
votes

We want to receive packets from udp sockets, the udp packets have variable length and we don't know how long they really are until we receive them (parts of them exactly, length were written in the sixth byte).

We tried the function lrs_set_receive_option with MarkerEnd only to find it has no help on this issue. The reason why we want to receive by packets is that we need to respond some packet by sending back user-defined udp packets.

Is there anybody knows how achieve that?

UPDATE

  1. The LR version seems to be v10 or v11.

  2. We need respond an incoming udp packet by sending back a udp packet immediately.
    The udp packet may be like this

    | orc code | packet length | Real DATA |

  3. Issue is we can't let loadrunner return data for each packets, sometimes it returns many packets in a buffer, sometimes it waits until timeout though when there has been an incoming packet in the socket buffer. While in the c programming language world, when calling recvfrom(udp socket) we are returned only one udp packet per time (per call) which is want we really want.

1
csocketsloadperformance-testingloadrunner
Could you add LR version and the protocol you use please – Buzzy
@Buzzy don't remember clearly.. it may be v10 or v11. – Wallace

1 Answers

1
votes

If you need raw socket support to intercept at the packet level then you are likely going to have to jump to a DLL virtual user in Visual Studio with the raw socket support.

As to your question on UDP support: Yes, a Winsock user supports both core transport types, UDP and TCP. TCP being the more common variant as connection oriented. However, packet examination is at layer 3 of the OSI model for the carrier protocol IP. The ACK should come before you receive the dataflow for your use in the script. You are looking at assembled data flows in the data.ws when you jump to the TCP and UDP level.

Now, you are likely receiving a warning on receive buffer size mismatch which is taking you down this path with a mismatch to the recording size. There is an easy way to address this. If you take your send buffer and construct it using the lrs_set_send_buffer() function, then anything that returns will be taken as correct, ignoring the previously recorded buffer size and not having to wait for a match or timeout before continuing.