356
votes

Is there a container adapter that would reverse the direction of iterators so I can iterate over a container in reverse with range-based for-loop?

With explicit iterators I would convert this:

for (auto i = c.begin(); i != c.end(); ++i) { ...

into this:

for (auto i = c.rbegin(); i != c.rend(); ++i) { ...

I want to convert this:

for (auto& i: c) { ...

to this:

for (auto& i: std::magic_reverse_adapter(c)) { ...

Is there such a thing or do I have to write it myself?

10
A reverse container adapter, sounds interesting, but I think you'll have to write it yourself. We wouldn't have this problem if the Standard committee would hurry up and adapt range based algorithms instead of explicit iterators.deft_code
@deft_code: "instead of?" Why would you want to get rid of iterator based algorithms? They're much better and less verbose for cases where you don't iterate from begin to end, or for dealing with stream iterators and the like. Range algorithms would be great, but they're really just syntactic sugar (except for the possibility of lazy evaluation) over iterator algorithms.Nicol Bolas
@deft_code template<typename T> class reverse_adapter { public: reverse_adapter(T& c) : c(c) { } typename T::reverse_iterator begin() { return c.rbegin(); } typename T::reverse_iterator end() { return c.rend(); } private: T& c; }; It can be improved (adding const versions, etc) but it works: vector<int> v {1, 2, 3}; reverse_adapter<decltype(v)> ra; for (auto& i : ra) cout << i; prints 321Seth Carnegie
@SethCarnegie: And to add a nice functional form: template<typename T> reverse_adapter<T> reverse_adapt_container(T &c) {return reverse_adapter<T>(c);} So then you can just use for(auto &i: reverse_adapt_container(v)) cout << i; to iterate.Nicol Bolas
@C.R: I don't think it should mean that, because that would make it unavailable as a concise syntax for loops where order does matter. IMO the conciseness is more important/useful than your semantic meaning, but if you don't value the conciseness ofc your style guide can give it whatever implication you want. That's kind of what parallel_for would be for, with an even stronger "I don't care what order" condition, if it were incorporated into the standard in some form. Of course it could have a range-based syntactic sugar too :-)Steve Jessop

10 Answers

252
votes

Actually Boost does have such adaptor: boost::adaptors::reverse.

#include <list>
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/range/adaptor/reversed.hpp>

int main()
{
    std::list<int> x { 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19 };
    for (auto i : boost::adaptors::reverse(x))
        std::cout << i << '\n';
    for (auto i : x)
        std::cout << i << '\n';
}
106
votes

Actually, in C++14 it can be done with a very few lines of code.

This is a very similar in idea to @Paul's solution. Due to things missing from C++11, that solution is a bit unnecessarily bloated (plus defining in std smells). Thanks to C++14 we can make it a lot more readable.

The key observation is that range-based for-loops work by relying on begin() and end() in order to acquire the range's iterators. Thanks to ADL, one doesn't even need to define their custom begin() and end() in the std:: namespace.

Here is a very simple-sample solution:

// -------------------------------------------------------------------
// --- Reversed iterable

template <typename T>
struct reversion_wrapper { T& iterable; };

template <typename T>
auto begin (reversion_wrapper<T> w) { return std::rbegin(w.iterable); }

template <typename T>
auto end (reversion_wrapper<T> w) { return std::rend(w.iterable); }

template <typename T>
reversion_wrapper<T> reverse (T&& iterable) { return { iterable }; }

This works like a charm, for instance:

template <typename T>
void print_iterable (std::ostream& out, const T& iterable)
{
    for (auto&& element: iterable)
        out << element << ',';
    out << '\n';
}

int main (int, char**)
{
    using namespace std;

    // on prvalues
    print_iterable(cout, reverse(initializer_list<int> { 1, 2, 3, 4, }));

    // on const lvalue references
    const list<int> ints_list { 1, 2, 3, 4, };
    for (auto&& el: reverse(ints_list))
        cout << el << ',';
    cout << '\n';

    // on mutable lvalue references
    vector<int> ints_vec { 0, 0, 0, 0, };
    size_t i = 0;
    for (int& el: reverse(ints_vec))
        el += i++;
    print_iterable(cout, ints_vec);
    print_iterable(cout, reverse(ints_vec));

    return 0;
}

prints as expected

4,3,2,1,
4,3,2,1,
3,2,1,0,
0,1,2,3,

NOTE std::rbegin(), std::rend(), and std::make_reverse_iterator() are not yet implemented in GCC-4.9. I write these examples according to the standard, but they would not compile in stable g++. Nevertheless, adding temporary stubs for these three functions is very easy. Here is a sample implementation, definitely not complete but works well enough for most cases:

// --------------------------------------------------
template <typename I>
reverse_iterator<I> make_reverse_iterator (I i)
{
    return std::reverse_iterator<I> { i };
}

// --------------------------------------------------
template <typename T>
auto rbegin (T& iterable)
{
    return make_reverse_iterator(iterable.end());
}

template <typename T>
auto rend (T& iterable)
{
    return make_reverse_iterator(iterable.begin());
}

// const container variants

template <typename T>
auto rbegin (const T& iterable)
{
    return make_reverse_iterator(iterable.end());
}

template <typename T>
auto rend (const T& iterable)
{
    return make_reverse_iterator(iterable.begin());
}
26
votes

This should work in C++11 without boost:

namespace std {
template<class T>
T begin(std::pair<T, T> p)
{
    return p.first;
}
template<class T>
T end(std::pair<T, T> p)
{
    return p.second;
}
}

template<class Iterator>
std::reverse_iterator<Iterator> make_reverse_iterator(Iterator it)
{
    return std::reverse_iterator<Iterator>(it);
}

template<class Range>
std::pair<std::reverse_iterator<decltype(begin(std::declval<Range>()))>, std::reverse_iterator<decltype(begin(std::declval<Range>()))>> make_reverse_range(Range&& r)
{
    return std::make_pair(make_reverse_iterator(begin(r)), make_reverse_iterator(end(r)));
}

for(auto x: make_reverse_range(r))
{
    ...
}
12
votes

If you can use range v3 , you can use the reverse range adapter ranges::view::reverse which allows you to view the container in reverse.

A minimal working example:

#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <range/v3/view.hpp>

int main()
{
    std::vector<int> intVec = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9};

    for (auto const& e : ranges::view::reverse(intVec)) {
        std::cout << e << " ";   
    }
    std::cout << std::endl;

    for (auto const& e : intVec) {
        std::cout << e << " ";   
    }
    std::cout << std::endl;
}

See DEMO 1.

Note: As per Eric Niebler, this feature will be available in C++20. This can be used with the <experimental/ranges/range> header. Then the for statement will look like this:

for (auto const& e : view::reverse(intVec)) {
       std::cout << e << " ";   
}

See DEMO 2

11
votes

Does this work for you:

#include <iostream>
#include <list>
#include <boost/range/begin.hpp>
#include <boost/range/end.hpp>
#include <boost/range/iterator_range.hpp>

int main(int argc, char* argv[]){

  typedef std::list<int> Nums;
  typedef Nums::iterator NumIt;
  typedef boost::range_reverse_iterator<Nums>::type RevNumIt;
  typedef boost::iterator_range<NumIt> irange_1;
  typedef boost::iterator_range<RevNumIt> irange_2;

  Nums n = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8};
  irange_1 r1 = boost::make_iterator_range( boost::begin(n), boost::end(n) );
  irange_2 r2 = boost::make_iterator_range( boost::end(n), boost::begin(n) );


  // prints: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 
  for(auto e : r1)
    std::cout << e << ' ';

  std::cout << std::endl;

  // prints: 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
  for(auto e : r2)
    std::cout << e << ' ';

  std::cout << std::endl;

  return 0;
}
8
votes
template <typename C>
struct reverse_wrapper {

    C & c_;
    reverse_wrapper(C & c) :  c_(c) {}

    typename C::reverse_iterator begin() {return c_.rbegin();}
    typename C::reverse_iterator end() {return c_.rend(); }
};

template <typename C, size_t N>
struct reverse_wrapper< C[N] >{

    C (&c_)[N];
    reverse_wrapper( C(&c)[N] ) : c_(c) {}

    typename std::reverse_iterator<const C *> begin() { return std::rbegin(c_); }
    typename std::reverse_iterator<const C *> end() { return std::rend(c_); }
};


template <typename C>
reverse_wrapper<C> r_wrap(C & c) {
    return reverse_wrapper<C>(c);
}

eg:

int main(int argc, const char * argv[]) {
    std::vector<int> arr{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
    int arr1[] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};

    for (auto i : r_wrap(arr)) {
        printf("%d ", i);
    }
    printf("\n");

    for (auto i : r_wrap(arr1)) {
        printf("%d ", i);
    }
    printf("\n");
    return 0;
}
5
votes

Got this example from cppreference. It works with:

GCC 10.1+ with flag -std=c++20

#include <ranges>
#include <iostream>
 
int main()
{
    static constexpr auto il = {3, 1, 4, 1, 5, 9};
 
    std::ranges::reverse_view rv {il};
    for (int i : rv)
        std::cout << i << ' ';
 
    std::cout << '\n';
 
    for(int i : il | std::views::reverse)
        std::cout << i << ' ';
}
3
votes

Sorry but with current C++ (apart from C++20) all these solutions do seem to be inferior to just use index-based for. Nothing here is just "a few lines of code". So, yes: iterate via a simple int-loop. That's the best solution.

2
votes

If not using C++14, then I find below the simplest solution.

#define METHOD(NAME, ...) auto NAME __VA_ARGS__ -> decltype(m_T.r##NAME) { return m_T.r##NAME; }
template<typename T>
struct Reverse
{
  T& m_T;

  METHOD(begin());
  METHOD(end());
  METHOD(begin(), const);
  METHOD(end(), const);
};
#undef METHOD

template<typename T>
Reverse<T> MakeReverse (T& t) { return Reverse<T>{t}; }

Demo.
It doesn't work for the containers/data-types (like array), which doesn't have begin/rbegin, end/rend functions.

2
votes

You could simply use BOOST_REVERSE_FOREACH which iterates backwards. For example, the code

#include <iostream>
#include <boost\foreach.hpp>

int main()
{
    int integers[] = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 };
    BOOST_REVERSE_FOREACH(auto i, integers)
    {
        std::cout << i << std::endl;
    }
    return 0;
}

generates the following output:

4

3

2

1

0