I have a task to create reports about various work items from a Team Foundation Server 2010 instance. They are looking for more information than the query tools seem to expose which is why I am not using the OOB reporting capabilities. The documentation on creating custom reports against TFS identify the Tfs_Analysis cube and the Tfs_Warehouse database as the intended sources for reporting.
They have created a custom work item, "Deployment Requests", to track requests for code migrations. This work item has custom urgency levels (critical, medium, low).
According to Manually Process the Data Warehouse and Analysis Services Cube for Team Foundation Server, every two minutes my ODS (Tfs_DefaultCollection) should sync with the Tfs_Warehouse and every 2 hours it hits the Tfs_Analysis cube. The basic work items correctly show up in my Tfs_Warehouse except not all of the data makes it over, in particular, the urgency isn't getting migrated.
As a concrete example, work item 19301 was a deployment request. This is what they can see using the native query tool from the web front-end.

I can find it in the Tfs_DefaultCollection and the "Urgency" is mapped to Fld10176.
SELECT
Fld10176 AS Urgency
, *
FROM Tfs_DefaultCollection.dbo.WorkItemsAre
WHERE ID = 19301
trimmed results...
Urgency Not A Field Changed Date
1 - Critical - (Right Away) 58 2011-09-07 15:52:29.613
If I query the warehouse, I see the deployment request and the "standard" data (people, time, area, etc)
SELECT
DWI.System_WorkItemType
, DWI.Microsoft_VSTS_Common_Priority
, DWI.Microsoft_VSTS_Common_Severity
, *
FROM
Tfw_Warehouse.dbo.DimWorkItem DWI
WHERE
DWI.System_Id = 19301
Trimmed results
System_WorkItemType Microsoft_VSTS_Common_Priority Microsoft_VSTS_Common_Severity
Deployment Request NULL NULL
I am not the TFS admin (first exposure to TFS is at this new gig) and thus far, they've been rather ...unhelpful.
- Is there be a way to map that custom field over to an existing field in the Tfs_Warehouse? (Backfilling legacy values would be great but fixing current/future is all I need)
- Is there a different approach I should be using?