This is what happens when I draw switching from the black texture to the lime green one in a simple for loop. It seems to have bits from the previously drawn texture.
Here's a simplified version of how my renderer works
- Init(): Create my VAO and attrib pointers and generate element buffer and indicies
- Begin(): Bind my vertex buffer and map the buffer pointer
- Draw(): Submit a renderable to draw which gets 4 vertecies in the vertex buffer each get a position, color, texCoords, and a Texture Slot
- End(): I delete the buffer pointer, bind my VAO, IBO, and textures to their active texture slots and draw the elements.
I do this every frame (except init). What I don't understand is if I draw PER TEXTURE, only having one active then this doesn't happen. It's when I have multiple active textures and they are bound.
Here's my renderer
void Renderer2D::Init()
{
m_Textures.reserve(32);
m_VertexBuffer.Create(nullptr, VERTEX_BUFFER_SIZE);
m_Layout.PushFloat(2); //Position
m_Layout.PushUChar(4); //Color
m_Layout.PushFloat(2); //TexCoords
m_Layout.PushFloat(1); //Texture ID
//VA is bound and VB is unbound
m_VertexArray.AddBuffer(m_VertexBuffer, m_Layout);
unsigned int* indices = new unsigned int[INDEX_COUNT];
int offset = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < INDEX_COUNT; i += 6)
{
indices[i + 0] = offset + 0;
indices[i + 1] = offset + 1;
indices[i + 2] = offset + 2;
indices[i + 3] = offset + 2;
indices[i + 4] = offset + 3;
indices[i + 5] = offset + 0;
offset += 4;
}
m_IndexBuffer.Create(indices, INDEX_COUNT);
m_VertexArray.Unbind();
}
void Renderer2D::Begin()
{
m_VertexBuffer.Bind();
m_Buffer = (VertexData*)m_VertexBuffer.GetBufferPointer();
}
void Renderer2D::Draw(Renderable2D& renderable)
{
const glm::vec2& position = renderable.GetPosition();
const glm::vec2& size = renderable.GetSize();
const Color& color = renderable.GetColor();
const glm::vec4& texCoords = renderable.GetTextureRect();
const float tid = AddTexture(renderable.GetTexture());
DT_CORE_ASSERT(tid != 0, "TID IS EQUAL TO ZERO");
m_Buffer->position = glm::vec2(position.x, position.y);
m_Buffer->color = color;
m_Buffer->texCoord = glm::vec2(texCoords.x, texCoords.y);
m_Buffer->tid = tid;
m_Buffer++;
m_Buffer->position = glm::vec2(position.x + size.x, position.y);
m_Buffer->color = color;
m_Buffer->texCoord = glm::vec2(texCoords.z, texCoords.y);
m_Buffer->tid = tid;
m_Buffer++;
m_Buffer->position = glm::vec2(position.x + size.x, position.y + size.y);
m_Buffer->color = color;
m_Buffer->texCoord = glm::vec2(texCoords.z, texCoords.w);
m_Buffer->tid = tid;
m_Buffer++;
m_Buffer->position = glm::vec2(position.x, position.y + size.y);
m_Buffer->color = color;
m_Buffer->texCoord = glm::vec2(texCoords.x, texCoords.w);
m_Buffer->tid = tid;
m_Buffer++;
m_IndexCount += 6;
}
void Renderer2D::End()
{
Flush();
}
const float Renderer2D::AddTexture(const Texture2D* texture)
{
for (int i = 0; i < m_Textures.size(); i++) {
if (texture == m_Textures[i]) // Compares memory addresses
return i + 1; // Returns the texture id plus one since 0 is null texture id
}
// If the texture count is already at or greater than max textures
if (m_Textures.size() >= MAX_TEXTURES)
{
End();
Begin();
}
m_Textures.push_back((Texture2D*)texture);
return m_Textures.size();
}
void Renderer2D::Flush()
{
m_VertexBuffer.DeleteBufferPointer();
m_VertexArray.Bind();
m_IndexBuffer.Bind();
for (int i = 0; i < m_Textures.size(); i++) {
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0 + i);
m_Textures[i]->Bind();
}
glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, m_IndexCount, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, NULL);
m_IndexBuffer.Unbind();
m_VertexArray.Unbind();
m_IndexCount = 0;
m_Textures.clear();
}
Here's my fragment shader
#version 330 core
out vec4 FragColor;
in vec4 ourColor;
in vec2 ourTexCoord;
in float ourTid;
uniform sampler2D textures[32];
void main()
{
vec4 texColor = ourColor;
if(ourTid > 0.0)
{
int tid = int(ourTid - 0.5);
texColor = ourColor * texture(textures[tid], ourTexCoord);
}
FragColor = texColor;
}
I appreciate any help, let me know if you need to see more code
GL_TEXTURE_2D_ARRAYrather than an array ofGL_TEXTURE_2D. Read about Core Language (GLSL) - Dynamically uniform expression - Rabbid76