The ffmpeg wiki links back to this page in reference to "How to split video efficiently". I'm not convinced this page answers that question, so I did as @AlcubierreDrive suggested…
echo "Two commands"
time ffmpeg -v quiet -y -i input.ts -vcodec copy -acodec copy -ss 00:00:00 -t 00:30:00 -sn test1.mkv
time ffmpeg -v quiet -y -i input.ts -vcodec copy -acodec copy -ss 00:30:00 -t 01:00:00 -sn test2.mkv
echo "One command"
time ffmpeg -v quiet -y -i input.ts -vcodec copy -acodec copy -ss 00:00:00 -t 00:30:00 \
-sn test3.mkv -vcodec copy -acodec copy -ss 00:30:00 -t 01:00:00 -sn test4.mkv
Which outputs...
Two commands
real 0m16.201s
user 0m1.830s
sys 0m1.301s
real 0m43.621s
user 0m4.943s
sys 0m2.908s
One command
real 0m59.410s
user 0m5.577s
sys 0m3.939s
I tested a SD & HD file, after a few runs & a little maths.
Two commands SD 0m53.94 #2 wins
One command SD 0m49.63
Two commands SD 0m55.00
One command SD 0m52.26 #1 wins
Two commands SD 0m58.60 #2 wins
One command SD 0m58.61
Two commands SD 0m54.60
One command SD 0m50.51 #1 wins
Two commands SD 0m53.94
One command SD 0m49.63 #1 wins
Two commands SD 0m55.00
One command SD 0m52.26 #1 wins
Two commands SD 0m58.71
One command SD 0m58.61 #1 wins
Two commands SD 0m54.63
One command SD 0m50.51 #1 wins
Two commands SD 1m6.67s #2 wins
One command SD 1m20.18
Two commands SD 1m7.67
One command SD 1m6.72 #1 wins
Two commands SD 1m4.92
One command SD 1m2.24 #1 wins
Two commands SD 1m1.73
One command SD 0m59.72 #1 wins
Two commands HD 4m23.20
One command HD 3m40.02 #1 wins
Two commands SD 1m1.30
One command SD 0m59.59 #1 wins
Two commands HD 3m47.89
One command HD 3m29.59 #1 wins
Two commands SD 0m59.82
One command SD 0m59.41 #1 wins
Two commands HD 3m51.18
One command HD 3m30.79 #1 wins
SD file = 1.35GB DVB transport stream
HD file = 3.14GB DVB transport stream
Conclusion
The single command is better if you are handling HD, it agrees with the manuals comments on using -ss after the input file to do a 'slow seek'. SD files have a negligible difference.
The two command version should be quicker by adding another -ss before the input file for the a 'fast seek' followed by the more accurate slow seek.
htop
), and tell us what the answer is? – AlcubierreDrive-ss
as input option in the second split might not be accurate, so you might not get a clean split. IMO the example by OP is more correct. – jiggunjer