I need to intercept key pressings and other user actions in my RichEdit box. I found it too complex to intercept user input in WM_KEYDOWN or WM_CHAR since some of the key pressings fire WM_CHAR, some of them not and also it has some other problems.
So I decided to listen EN_UPDATE messages, cuz it is said that this event fires on every change and just before RichEdit control starts to redraw itself ( https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/controls/en-update ). Well it sounds like trustworthy mechanism which allows to intercept all the changes.
But I found that not every WM_KEYDOWN causes firing of EN_UPDATE. I rapidly pressed many buttons (usual "char" buttons like "d", "f" and so on, no special keys), and found that when I inputed 100 chars, and WM_KEYDOWN also fired 100 times, but EN_UPDATE fired only 96 times (the number of activations of EN_UPDATE varies, sometimes it equals to the number of keypressings, don't know what it depends on). The number of WM_KEYDOWN and the number of characters entered are always equal of course.
Here's the code:
BOOL CEditorView::OnCommand( WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam )
{
static long count = 0;
if( HIWORD( wParam) == EN_UPDATE )
{
if( (HWND)lParam == g_hwnd_RE )
{
if( g_allowProcessing )
{
count++;
}
}
}
return CDockablePane::OnCommand( wParam, lParam );
}
///// and WM_KEYDOWN
case WM_KEYDOWN:
{
g_testCount++;
return DefSubclassProc( hwnd, msg, wp, lp );
break;
}
Am I doing something wrong or is it just specific working style of EN_UPDATE? Like may be it accumulates changes when user input is too fast.