Function clause error Erlang

Question

I am trying to understand process communication in erlang. Here I have a master process and five friends process. If a friend sends a message to any of the other 5 they have to reply back. But the master should be aware of all this. I am pasting the code below.

-module(prog).
-import(lists,[append/2,concat/1]).

-import(maps,[from_lists/1,find/2,get/2,update/3]).
-import(string,[equal/2]).
-import(file,[consult/1]).
-export([create_process/1,friends/4, master/1, main/0,prnt/1]).     



%% CREATE PROCESS 
create_process([])->ok;
create_process([H|T])->
    {A,B} = H,
    Pid = spawn(prog,friends,[B,self(),0,A]),
    register(A,Pid),
    create_process(T).


%% FRIENDS PROCESS
friends(Msg, M_pid, State, Self_name)->
    S = lists:concat([Self_name," state =",State,"\n"]),
    io:fwrite(S),
    if
        State == 0 ->
            timer:sleep(500),
            io:fwrite("~p~n",[Self_name]),
            lists:foreach(fun(X) -> whereis(X)!{Self_name,"intro",self()} end, Msg),
            friends(Msg, M_pid, State + 1, Self_name);
        State > 0 ->
            receive
                {Process_name, Process_msg, Process_id} -> 
                    I = equal(Process_msg,"intro"),
                    R = equal(Process_msg,"reply"),
                    XxX = lists:concat([Self_name," recieved ",Process_msg," from ",Process_name,"\n"]),
                    io:fwrite(XxX),
                    if
                        I == true ->
                            io:fwrite("~p~n",[whereis(Process_name)]),
                            M_pid!{lists:concat([Self_name," received intro message from ", Process_name , "[",Process_id,"]"]), self()},
                            io:fwrite(I),
                            whereis(Process_name)!{Self_name, "reply",self()},

                            friends(Msg, M_pid, State + 1, Self_name);
                        R == true ->
                            M_pid!{lists:concat([Self_name," received reply message from ", Process_name , "[",Process_id,"]"]), self()},
                            io:fwrite(R),
                            friends(Msg, M_pid, State + 1, Self_name)
                    end
            after
                1000->
                    io:fwrite(lists:concat([Self_name," has received no calls for 1 second, ending..."]))
            end

    end.


master(State)->
    receive
        {Process_message, Process_id} ->
            io:fwrite(Process_message),
            master(State+1)
    after
        2000->
            ok
    end.


main() ->
    B = [{john, [jill,joe,bob]},
{jill, [bob,joe,bob]},
{sue, [jill,jill,jill,bob,jill]},
{bob, [john]},
{joe, [sue]}],
    create_process(B),
    io:fwrite("~p~n",[whereis(sue)]),

    master(0).

I think the line in friends() function,

M_pid!{lists:concat([Self_name," received intro message from ", Process_name , "[",Process_id,"]"]), self()}

is the cause of error but I cannot understand why. M_pid is known and I am concatenating all the info and sending it to master but I am confused why it isnt working.

The error I am getting is as follows:

Error in process <0.55.0> with exit value: {function_clause,[{lists,thing_to_list,
                         [<0.54.0>],
                         [{file,"lists.erl"},{line,603}]},
                  {lists,flatmap,2,[{file,"lists.erl"},{line,1250}]},
                  {lists,flatmap,2,[{file,"lists.erl"},{line,1250}]},
                  {prog,friends,4,[{file,"prog.erl"},{line,45}]}]}

I dont know what is causing the error. Sorry for asking noob questions and thanks for your help.

Try changing Process_id to pid_to_list(Process_id) in both the calls to lists:concat/2. — Dogbert
Hi, Dogbert. I will go home and give it a try. But out of curiosity what is the difference? and why was Process_id messing up list:concat/2 ? — optimal substructure
The error message you are reporting doesn't look consistent with the piece of code (no lists:flatmap/2 call at line 45 or anywhere else). I have 2 remarks: 1/ you have no recursive call in the after clauses, so if a process hits this clause, it will stop. 2/ it is very unusual to use the import directive, generally, erlang programmers prefer to show explicitly the fully qualified calls (as you do) and in this case the import directive is useless. — Pascal

7stud 7stud · Accepted Answer · 2018-06-20T22:29:38

An example of what Dogbert discovered:

-module(my).
-compile(export_all).

go() ->
    Pid = spawn(my, nothing, []),
    lists:concat(["hello", Pid]).


nothing() -> nothing.

In the shell:

2> c(my).
my.erl:2: Warning: export_all flag enabled - all functions will be exported
{ok,my}

3> my:go().
** exception error: no function clause matching 
                    lists:thing_to_list(<0.75.0>) (lists.erl, line 603)
     in function  lists:flatmap/2 (lists.erl, line 1250)
     in call from lists:flatmap/2 (lists.erl, line 1250)
4>

But:

-module(my).
-compile(export_all).

go() ->
    Pid = spawn(my, nothing, []),
    lists:concat(["hello", pid_to_list(Pid)]).

nothing() -> nothing.

In the shell:

4> c(my).  
my.erl:2: Warning: export_all flag enabled - all functions will be exported
{ok,my}

5> my:go().
"hello<0.83.0>"

From the erl docs:

concat(Things) -> string()
    Things = [Thing]
    Thing = atom() | integer() | float() | string()

The list that you feed concat() must contain either atoms, integers, floats, or strings. A pid is neither an atom, integer, float, nor string, so a pid cannot be used with concat(). However, pid_to_list() returns a string:

pid_to_list(Pid) -> string()
    Pid = pid()

As you can see, a pid has its own type: pid().

Function clause error Erlang

2 Answers