1
votes

I am trying to add relationships for multiple tables but Power Bi is only allowing ONE table to be with "Both" for the "Cross Filter Direction".

If I try to select other tables to be with "Both" cross filter, then an error comes up saying "Power BI Desktop allows only one filtering path between tables in a Data Model". Is there a way to go around that?

I have three data sets ( tables ), that are joined based on two non-unique columns. First dataset (table) has site, item numbers, orders, due dates. Second dataset (table) has site, item numbers, and available quantities. Third dataset has site, item numbers, and released orders to manufacture. The three non-unique columns are sites and item numbers.

Out of these three datasets (tables), I have created two more datasets with one unique columns (sites, and item numbers) to inforce unique relationships between the three datasets.

The problem that I am facing is when I have filtering in the models it doesn't flow back and forth between the datasets. I assume fixing the filtering direction will result in fixing that.

enter image description here

enter image description here Thanks!

1
Can you be more concrete with your description? What do your tables look like and what are you joining on? What is it that you need to flow across tables?Alexis Olson
Modified my initial post, please let me know if that helps. The error that I get is that “Power BI allows only one filtering path between tables in a Data Model. Deactivate existing relationships between the tables or change their filter direction. This relationship can be added as one-way filtering”.MrKen
Posting the relationship diagram would be useful as well.Alexis Olson
I think when you wrote "dataset" above you meant "table"? In Power BI terms, a dataset is a collection of tables, stored in one PBIX file.Mike Honey
@AlexisOlson I posted the relationship diagramMrKen

1 Answers

0
votes

I would not use the Both cross filter direction for that scenario. As you are observing it comes with a lot of restrictions, so I only use it for "Many-to-Many" scenarios - not what you described.

I think you are on the right path with your sites and item number tables. Just be careful to use the copy of the fields in those tables (e.g. item number from item numbers) in your visuals, not the same fields in the 3 "data" tables.