3
votes

Previously had a very compact and comprehensive answer for my question.

I had it working for my custom type but now due to some reason I had to change it to string type which is now causing type mismatch errors.

module AsyncResult =
    let bind (binder : 'a -> Async<Result<'b, 'c>>) (asyncFun : Async<Result<'a, 'c>>) : Async<Result<'b, 'c>> =
        async {
            let! result = asyncFun
            match result with
            | Error e -> return Error e
            | Ok x -> return! binder x
        }

    let compose (f : 'a -> Async<Result<'b, 'e>>) (g : 'b -> Async<Result<'c, 'e>>) = fun x -> bind g (f x)
    let (>>=) a f = bind f a
    let (>=>) f g = compose f g

Railway Oriented functions

let create (json: string) : Async<Result<string, Error>> =
    let url = "http://api.example.com"
    let request = WebRequest.CreateHttp(Uri url)
    request.Method <- "GET"

     async {
         try
             // http call
             return Ok "result"
         with :? WebException as e -> 
             return Error {Code = 500; Message = "Internal Server Error"}
     }

test

type mismatch error for the AsyncResult.bind line

let chain = create
         >> AsyncResult.bind (fun (result: string) -> (async {return Ok "more results"}))


match chain "initial data" |> Async.RunSynchronously with
 | Ok data -> Assert.IsTrue(true)
 | Error error -> Assert.IsTrue(false)

Error details:

EntityTests.fs(101, 25): [FS0001] Type mismatch. Expecting a '(string -> string -> Async<Result<string,Error>>) -> 'a' but given a 'Async<Result<'b,'c>> -> Async<Result<'d,'c>>' The type 'string -> string -> Async<Result<string,Error>>' does not match the type 'Async<Result<'a,'b>>'.

EntityTests.fs(101, 25): [FS0001] Type mismatch. Expecting a '(string -> string -> Async<Result<string,Error>>) -> 'a' but given a 'Async<Result<string,'b>> -> Async<Result<string,'b>>' The type 'string -> string -> Async<Result<string,Error>>' does not match the type 'Async<Result<string,'a>>'.

Edit

Curried or partial application

In context of above example, is it the problem with curried functions? for instance if create function has this signature.

let create (token: string) (json: string) : Async<Result<string, Error>> =

and then later build chain with curried function

let chain = create "token" >> AsyncResult.bind (fun (result: string) -> (async {return Ok "more results"}))

Edit 2 Is there a problem with following case?

signature

let create (token: Token) (entityName: string) (entityType: string) (publicationId: string) : Async<Result<string, Error>> =

test

let chain = create token >> AsyncResult.bind ( fun (result: string) -> async {return Ok "more results"} )

match chain "test" "article" "pubid" |> Async.RunSynchronously with
2
Don't paste screenshots of error messages; they're useless to anyone doing a text search who might need to find this question later. Copy and paste them in text form. I've done it for you this time so that you can see how your error messages should be pasted. If you click on "edit" to see the Markdown source, you'll notice I prefixed the messages with a single > character: that's how you do a blockquote (one > per paragraph or per line; use the preview window to be sure your formatting is correct). I also added backticks around the types so that they would be fixed-font. - rmunn
Thanks. I'll note that. As you can see there was an attempt, I might have a bit of indentation issue in my question but I double checked everything in my code, I've visual clues of tabs and spaces and see everything aligned, i suspect problem is somewhere else. please advise. - Developer11
I'm pretty sure you have a different create function in scope in your test code. To verify that, try to rename the create function to something different and see if the error persists. - Fyodor Soikin
I've looked through your edit and I don't see any obvious type errors (the most common newbie mistake is forgetting to pass one parameter, which means instead of a value you end up with a function because of currying, and if you're a newbie you then get confused for a while). I suspect that Fyodor Soikin is right and you may have some other create function. If you're using VS Code, try putting your cursor on the word create in let chain = create >> (...) and hitting F12 for "go to definition". If you're in Rider, try a Ctrl+click for "go to definition". Make sure it's the right function. - rmunn
I have a couple minutes right now, so I'll just say that I was wrong about needing apply in this situation. You just need to supply enough parameters to create. E.g., let chain token entityName entityType = create token entityName entityType >> AsyncResult.bind (fun (result : string) -> .... Then the types will line up because you're passing a string -> Async<Result<whatever>> function into bind. - rmunn

2 Answers

1
votes

Update: At the front of the answer, even, since your edit 2 changes everything.

In your edit 2, you have finally revealed your actual code, and your problem is very simple: you're misunderstanding how the types work in a curried F# function.

When your create function looked like let create (json: string) = ..., it was a function of one parameter. It took a string, and returned a result type (in this case, Async<Result<string, Error>>). So the function signature was string -> Async<Result<string, Error>>.

But the create function you've just shown us is a different type entirely. It takes four parameters (one Token and three strings), not one. That means its signature is:

Token -> string -> string -> string -> Async<Result<string, Error>>

Remember how currying works: any function of multiple parameters can be thought of as a series of functions of one parameter, which return the "next" function in that chain. E.g., let add3 a b c = a + b + c is of type int -> int -> int -> int; this means that add3 1 returns a function that's equivalent to let add2 b c = 1 + b + c. And so on.

Now, keeping currying in mind, look at your function type. When you pass a single Token value to it as you do in your example (where it's called as create token, you get a function of type:

string -> string -> string -> Async<Result<string, Error>>

This is a function that takes a string, which returns another function that takes a string, which returns a third function which takes a string and returns an Async<Result<whatever>>. Now compare that to the type of the binder parameter in your bind function:

(binder : 'a -> Async<Result<'b, 'c>>)

Here, 'a is string, so is 'b, and 'c is Error. So when the generic bind function is applied to your specific case, it's looking for a function of type string -> Async<Result<'b, 'c>>. But you're giving it a function of type string -> string -> string -> Async<Result<string, Error>>. Those two function types are not the same!

That's the fundamental cause of your type error. You're trying to apply a function that returns a function that returns function that returns a result of type X to a design pattern (the bind design pattern) that expects a function that returns a result of type X. What you need is the design pattern called apply. I have to leave quite soon so I don't have time to write you an explanation of how to use apply, but fortunately Scott Wlaschin has already written a good one. It covers a lot, not just "apply", but you'll find the details about apply in there as well. And that's the cause of your problem: you used bind when you needed to use apply.

Original answer follows:

I don't yet know for a fact what's causing your problem, but I have a suspicion. But first, I want to comment that the parameter names for your AsyncResult.bind are wrong. Here's what you wrote:

    let bind (binder : 'a -> Async<Result<'b, 'c>>)
             (asyncFun : Async<Result<'a, 'c>>) : Async<Result<'b, 'c>> =

(I moved the second parameter in line with the first parameter so it wouldn't scroll on Stack Overflow's smallish column size, but that would compile correctly if the types were right: since the two parameters are lined up vertically, F# would know that they are both belonging to the same "parent", in this case a function.)

Look at your second parameter. You've named it asyncFun, but there's no arrow in its type description. That's not a function, it's a value. A function would look like something -> somethingElse. You should name it something like asyncValue, not asyncFun. By naming it asyncFun, you're setting yourself up for confusion later.

Now for the answer to the question you asked. I think your problem is this line, where you've fallen afoul of the F# "offside rule":

let chain = create
         >> AsyncResult.bind (fun (result: string) -> (async {return Ok "more results"}))

Note the position of the >> operator, which is to the left of its first operand. Yes, the F# syntax appears to allow that in most situations, but I suspect that if you simply change that function definition to the following, your code will work:

let chain =
    create
 >> AsyncResult.bind (fun (result: string) -> (async {return Ok "more results"}))

Or, better yet because it's good style to make the |> (and >>) operators line up with their first operand:

let chain =
    create
    >> AsyncResult.bind (fun (result: string) -> (async {return Ok "more results"}))

If you look carefully at the rules that Scott Wlaschin lays out in https://fsharpforfunandprofit.com/posts/fsharp-syntax/, you'll note that his examples where he shows exceptions to the "offside rule", he writes them like this:

let f g h =   g   // defines a new line at col 15
           >> h   // ">>" allowed to be outside the line

Note how the >> character is still to the right of the = in the function definition. I don't know exactly what the F# spec says about the combination of function definitions and the offside rule (Scott Wlaschin is great, but he's not the spec so he could be wrong, and I don't have time to look up the spec right now), but I've seen it do funny things that I didn't quite expect when I wrote functions with part of the function definition on the same line as the function, and the rest on the next line.

E.g., I once wrote something like this, which didn't work:

let f a = if a = 0 then
        printfn "Zero"
    else
        printfn "Non-zero"

But then I changed it to this, which did work:

let f a =
    if a = 0 then
        printfn "Zero"
    else
        printfn "Non-zero"

I notice that in Snapshot's answer, he made your chain function be defined on a single line, and that worked for him. So I suspect that that's your problem.

Rule of thumb: If your function has anything after the = on the same line, make the function all on one line. If your function is going to be two lines, put nothing after the =. E.g.:

let f a b = a + b  // This is fine
let g c d =
    c * d  // This is also fine
let h x y = x
          + y  // This is asking for trouble
1
votes

I would suspect that the error stems from a minor change in indentation since adding a single space to an FSharp program changes its meaning, the FSharp compiler than quickly reports phantom errors because it interprets the input differently. I just pasted it in and added bogus classes and removed some spaces and now it is working just fine.

module AsyncResult =

    [<StructuralEquality; StructuralComparison>]
    type Result<'T,'TError> = 
    | Ok of ResultValue:'T
    | Error of ErrorValue:'TError

    let bind (binder : 'a -> Async<Result<'b, 'c>>) (asyncFun : Async<Result<'a, 'c>>) : Async<Result<'b, 'c>> =
        async {
            let! result = asyncFun
            match result with
            | Error e -> return Error e
            | Ok x -> return! binder x
        }

    let compose (f : 'a -> Async<Result<'b, 'e>>) (g : 'b -> Async<Result<'c, 'e>>) = fun x -> bind g (f x)
    let (>>=) a f = bind f a
    let (>=>) f g = compose f g

open AsyncResult
open System.Net

type Assert =
    static member IsTrue (conditional:bool) = System.Diagnostics.Debug.Assert(conditional)


type Error = {Code:int; Message:string}

[<EntryPoint>]
let main args =
    let create (json: string) : Async<Result<string, Error>> =
        let url = "http://api.example.com"
        let request = WebRequest.CreateHttp(Uri url)
        request.Method <- "GET"

        async {
             try
                 // http call
                 return Ok "result"
             with :? WebException as e -> 
                 return Error {Code = 500; Message = "Internal Server Error"}
        }

    let chain = create >> AsyncResult.bind (fun (result: string) -> (async {return Ok "more results"}))

    match chain "initial data" |> Async.RunSynchronously with
    | Ok data -> Assert.IsTrue(true)
    | Error error -> Assert.IsTrue(false)

    0