95
votes

I'm working with many jQuery plugins, that often create DOM elements without id or other identification properties, and the only way to get them in Capybara (for clicking for example) - is to get their neighbor (another child of its ancestor) first. But I didn't find anywhere, does Capybara support such things for example:

find('#some_button').parent.fill_in "Name:", :with => name

?

9
Also it will be very useful for me, if you tell, does Capybara generate click on elements with { display: hidden }, and is there a way to find elements in some scope, where display != hidden ? - sandrew
This is a separate question, but it depends on the driver that you're using. webrat will find hidden things happily, but selenium is not as happy to click on items that you can't see. - jamuraa

9 Answers

115
votes

I really found jamuraa's answer helpful, but going for full xpath gave me a nightmare of a string in my case, so I happily made use of the ability to concatenate find's in Capybara, allowing me to mix css and xpath selection. Your example would then look like this:

find('#some_button').find(:xpath,".//..").fill_in "Name:", :with => name

Capybara 2.0 update: find(:xpath,".//..") will most likely result in an Ambiguous match error. In that case, use first(:xpath,".//..") instead.

40
votes

I found the following that does work:

find(:xpath, '..')

Capybara has been updated to support this.

https://github.com/jnicklas/capybara/pull/505

39
votes

There isn't a way to do this with capybara and CSS. I've used XPath in the past to accomplish this goal though, which does have a way to get the parent element and is supported by Capybara:

find(:xpath, '//*[@id="some_button"]/..').fill_in "Name:", :with => name
11
votes

If you stumbled across this trying to figure out how to find any parent (as in ancestor) node (as hinted at in @vrish88's comment on @Pascal Lindelauf's answer):

find('#some_button').find(:xpath, 'ancestor::div[@id="some_div_id"]')
7
votes

This answer pertains to how to manipulate a sibling element which is what I believe the original question is alluding to

Your question hypothesis works with a minor tweak. If the dynamically generated field looks like this and does not have an id:

<div>
  <input></input>
  <button>Test</button>
</div>

Your query would then be:

find('button', text: 'Test').find(:xpath, "..").find('input').set('whatever')

If the dynamically generated input does come attached with an id element (be careful with these though as in angular, they are wont to change based on adding and deleting elements) it would be something like this:

find('button', text: 'Test').find(:xpath, "..").fill_in('#input_1', with: 'whatever')

Hope that helps.

4
votes

I'm using a different approach by finding the parent element first using the text within this parent element:

find("<parent element>", text: "text within your #some_button").fill_in "Name:", with: name

Maybe this is useful in a similiar situation.

2
votes

I needed to find an ancestor with a css class, though it was indeterminate if it the target ancestor had one or more css classes present, so I didn't see a way to make a deterministic xpath query. I worked this up instead:

def find_ancestor_with_class(field, cssClass)
  ancestor = field
  loop do
    ancestor = ancestor.find(:xpath, '..')
    break if ancestor.nil?

    break if ancestor.has_css? cssClass
  end

  ancestor
end

Warning: use this sparingly, it could cost you a lot of time in tests so make sure the ancestor is just a few hops away.

1
votes

As mentioned in comment by @Tyler Rick Capybara in these days have methods[ ancestor(selector) and sibling(selector)