I've heard before that POD types cannot have private data
In C++03 POD types cannot have private data (see AndreyT's answer).
However the definition of POD has been changed in C++0x (See 9/10
).
As per n3225
A POD struct is a class that is both a trivial class and a standard-layout class, and has no non-static data members of type non-POD struct, non-POD union (or array of such types).
...
...
A POD class is a class that is either a POD struct or a POD union.
That means
struct demo
{
private:
int a, b;
};
is POD in C++0x because demo
is both trivial and standard layout.
The definition of Standard layout is in section 9/7
A standard-layout class is a class that:
- has no non-static data members of type non-standard-layout class (or array of such types) or reference,
- has no virtual functions (10.3) and no virtual base classes (10.1),
- has the same access control (Clause 11) for all non-static data members,
- has no non-standard-layout base classes,
- either has no non-static data members in the most-derived class and at most one base class with
non-static data members, or has no base classes with non-static data members, and
- has no base classes of the same type as the first non-static data member.11
.
Would then, WindowsApi::Uuid be a POD class?
Nopes! WindowsApi::Uuid
is neither POD in C++03 nor in C++0x. A trivial class is a class that has a trivial default constructor (12.1) and is trivially copyable. WindowsApi::Uuid
has a non trivial default constructor.
So this rule got relaxed in C++0x then?
Yes! (Considering Clause 11)
Also check out the FAQ entry on Aggregates and PODs