I've got the following equations:
q1dd,b1,q2,q3,v1,q2dd,a1,a2,b2 = symbols('\ddot{q}_1 b1 q2 q3 v1 \ddot{q}_2 a1 a2 b2')
eq1 = -q1dd+b1*cos(q2)*sin(q3)*v1
eq2 = -q2dd+a1*sin(q2)+a2*cos(q2) + b2*cos(q3)*v1
display(eq1)
display(eq2)
According to sympy rules these are -lhs+rhs=0. Thus, both equations are equal to zero. I'd like to solve the set in sympy
sol1 = nonlinsolve([eq1,eq2],[v1,q3])
sol2 = solve([eq1,eq2],[v1,q3])
however, the result is super complicated. Also trigsimp
and simplify
do not change the solution.
By hand I can just divide eq1/eq2 = 0 and solve for tan(q3) and solve eq1 for v1. This is a very short solution.
My question is: am I doing something wrong (other solver, form of parametrization,handling,...), or is sympy just not ready yet to solve these things as elegantly?