I would like to use an implicit variable and a nonlinear solver to iterate on its value in a system using finite differences for derivative calculation. I understand the Newton solver needs analytical derivatives but the non-linear Gauss-Siedel does not seem to be iterating correctly either. To be sure that I had coded things up appropriately, I tested this approach on the intersect_parabola_line.py example provided in the package.
from __future__ import print_function
from openmdao.api import Component, Group, Problem, Newton, ScipyGMRES,NLGaussSeidel
class Line(Component):
"""Evaluates y = -2x + 4."""
def __init__(self):
super(Line, self).__init__()
self.add_param('x', 1.0)
self.add_output('y', 0.0)
# User can change these.
self.slope = -2.0
self.intercept = 4.0
def solve_nonlinear(self, params, unknowns, resids):
""" y = -2x + 4 """
x = params['x']
m = self.slope
b = self.intercept
unknowns['y'] = m*x + b
class Parabola(Component):
"""Evaluates y = 3x^2 - 5"""
def __init__(self):
super(Parabola, self).__init__()
self.add_param('x', 1.0)
self.add_output('y', 0.0)
# User can change these.
self.a = 3.0
self.b = 0.0
self.c = -5.0
def solve_nonlinear(self, params, unknowns, resids):
""" y = 3x^2 - 5 """
x = params['x']
a = self.a
b = self.b
c = self.c
unknowns['y'] = a*x**2 + b*x + c
class Balance(Component):
"""Evaluates the residual y1-y2"""
def __init__(self):
super(Balance, self).__init__()
self.add_param('y1', 0.0)
self.add_param('y2', 0.0)
self.add_state('x', 5.0)
def solve_nonlinear(self, params, unknowns, resids):
"""This component does no calculation on its own. It mainly holds the
initial value of the state. An OpenMDAO solver outside of this
component varies it to drive the residual to zero."""
pass
def apply_nonlinear(self, params, unknowns, resids):
""" Report the residual y1-y2 """
y1 = params['y1']
y2 = params['y2']
resids['x'] = y1 - y2
if __name__ == '__main__':
top = Problem()
root = top.root = Group()
root.add('line', Line())
root.add('parabola', Parabola())
root.add('bal', Balance())
root.connect('line.y', 'bal.y1')
root.connect('parabola.y', 'bal.y2')
root.connect('bal.x', 'line.x')
root.connect('bal.x', 'parabola.x')
root.deriv_options['type'] = 'fd'
root.nl_solver = NLGaussSeidel() #Newton()
root.ln_solver = ScipyGMRES()
root.nl_solver.options['iprint'] = 2
top.setup()
# Positive solution
top['bal.x'] = 7.0
root.list_states()
top.run()
print('Positive Solution x=%f, line.y=%f, parabola.y=%f' % (top['bal.x'], top['line.y'], top['parabola.y']))
# Negative solution
top['bal.x'] = -7.0
root.list_states()
top.run()
print('Negative Solution x=%f, line.y=%f, parabola.y=%f' % (top['bal.x'], top['line.y'], top['parabola.y']))
The output that I get is:
States in model:
bal.x
Value: 7.0
Residual: 0.0
[root] NL: NLN_GS 1 | 152 1
[root] NL: NLN_GS 2 | 152 1
[root] NL: NLN_GS 2 | Converged in 2 iterations
Positive Solution x=7.000000, line.y=-10.000000, parabola.y=142.000000
States in model:
bal.x
Value: -7.0
Residual: -152.0
[root] NL: NLN_GS 1 | 124 1
[root] NL: NLN_GS 2 | 124 1
[root] NL: NLN_GS 2 | Converged in 2 iterations
Negative Solution x=-7.000000, line.y=18.000000, parabola.y=142.000000
Any tips would be appreciated. I am using Python 2.7.13 and OpenMDAO 1.7.3 on OSX.