Mutate with a list column function in dplyr

Question

I am trying to calculate the Jaccard similarity between a source vector and comparison vectors in a tibble.

First, create a tibble with a names_ field (vector of strings). Using dplyr's mutate, create names_vec, a list-column, where each row is now a vector (each element of vector is a letter).

Then, create a new tibble with column jaccard_sim that is supposed to calculate the Jaccard similarity.

source_vec <- c('a', 'b', 'c')

df_comp <- tibble(names_ = c("b d f", "u k g", "m o c"),
              names_vec = strsplit(names_, ' '))

df_comp_jaccard <- df_comp %>%
   dplyr::mutate(jaccard_sim = length(intersect(names_vec, source_vec))/length(union(names_vec, source_vec)))

All the values in jaccard_sim are zero. However, if we run something like this, we get the correct Jaccard similarity of 0.2 for the first entry:

a <- length(intersect(source_vec, df_comp[[1,2]]))
b <- length(union(source_vec, df_comp[[1,2]]))
a/b

source_vec is static and is not being iterated over, so I don't see why map2 is required — matsuo_basho

Moody_Mudskipper Moody_Mudskipper · Accepted Answer · 2017-10-23T09:57:12

You could simply add rowwise

df_comp_jaccard <- df_comp %>%
  rowwise() %>%
  dplyr::mutate(jaccard_sim = length(intersect(names_vec, source_vec))/
                              length(union(names_vec, source_vec)))

# A tibble: 3 x 3
  names_ names_vec jaccard_sim
   <chr>    <list>       <dbl>
1  b d f <chr [3]>         0.2
2  u k g <chr [3]>         0.0
3  m o c <chr [3]>         0.2

Using rowwise you get the intuitive behavior some would expect when using mutate : "do this operation for every row".

Not using rowwise means you take advantage of vectorized functions, which is much faster, that's why it's the default, but may yield unexpected results if you're not careful.

The impression that mutate (or other dplyr functions) works row-wise is an illusion due to the fact you're working with vectorized functions, in fact you're always juggling with full columns.

I'll illustrate with a couple of examples:

Sometimes the result is the same, with a vectorized function such as paste:

tibble(a=1:10,b=10:1) %>% mutate(X = paste(a,b,sep="_"))
tibble(a=1:10,b=10:1) %>% rowwise %>% mutate(X = paste(a,b,sep="_"))
# # A tibble: 5 x 3
#       a     b     X
#   <int> <int> <chr>
# 1     1     5   1_5
# 2     2     4   2_4
# 3     3     3   3_3
# 4     4     2   4_2
# 5     5     1   5_1

And sometimes it's different, with a function that is not vectorized, such as max:

tibble(a=1:5,b=5:1) %>% mutate(max(a,b))
# # A tibble: 5 x 3
#       a     b `max(a, b)`
#   <int> <int>       <int>
# 1     1     5           5
# 2     2     4           5
# 3     3     3           5
# 4     4     2           5
# 5     5     1           5

tibble(a=1:5,b=5:1) %>% rowwise %>% mutate(max(a,b))
# # A tibble: 5 x 3
#       a     b `max(a, b)`
#   <int> <int>       <int>
# 1     1     5           5
# 2     2     4           4
# 3     3     3           3
# 4     4     2           4
# 5     5     1           5

Note that in this case you shouldn't use rowwise in a real life situation, but pmax which is vectorized for this purpose:

tibble(a=1:5,b=5:1) %>% mutate(pmax(a,b))
# # A tibble: 5 x 3
#       a     b `pmax(a, b)`
#   <int> <int>        <int>
# 1     1     5            5
# 2     2     4            4
# 3     3     3            3
# 4     4     2            4
# 5     5     1            5

Intersect is such function, you fed this function one list column containing vectors and one other vector, these 2 objects have no intersection.

Mutate with a list column function in dplyr

2 Answers