Spring: unit and integration tests

Question

I'm looking for best practices for setting up unit and integration tests using Spring.

I usually use 3 kind of tests:

• "real" unit tests (no dependencies)
• tests run either as "unit" test (in-memory db, local calls, mock objects,...) or as integration test (persistent db, remote calls,...)
• tests run only as integration tests

Currently I only have tests of the second category, which is the tricky part. I set-up a base test class like:

@ContextConfiguration(locations = { "/my_spring_test.xml" })
public abstract class AbstractMyTestCase extends AbstractJUnit4SpringContextTests

And "unit" tests like:

public class FooTest extends AbstractMyTestCase

with autowired attributes.

What's the best way to run the test in a different (integration test) environment? Subclass the test and override the ContextConfiguration?

@ContextConfiguration(locations = { "/my_spring_integration_test.xml" })
public class FooIntegrationTest extends FooTest

Would this work (I cannot currently easily test it here)? The problem with this approach is that "@ContextConfiguration(locations = { "/my_spring_integration_test.xml" })" is duplicated a lot.

Any suggestions?

Regards, Florian

Answer 1

I extended the GenericXmlContextLoader

public class MyContextLoader extends GenericXmlContextLoader {

and overrote the

protected String[] generateDefaultLocations(Class<?> clazz)

method to collect the config file names of a directory which I can specify by a SystemProperty (-Dtest.config=).

I also modified the follwowing method to NOT modify any locations

@Override
protected String[] modifyLocations(Class<?> clazz, String... locations) {
    return locations;
}

I use this context loader like this

@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
@ContextConfiguration(loader = MyContextLoader.class)
public class Test { .... }

Running the test with a SystemProperty indicating the source of the config files enables you now to use completely different configurations.

The usage of a SystemProperty is of course only one strategy to specify the configuration location. You can do whatever you want in generateDefaultLocations().

---

EDIT:

This solution enables you to use complete different application context configurations (e.g. for mock objects) and not only different properties. You do not need a build step to deploy everything to your "classpath" location. My concrete implementation also used the users name as default to look for a configuration directory (src/test/resources/{user}) if no system property is given (makes it easy to maintain specific test environments for all developers on the project).

The usage of the PropertyPlaceholder ist still possible and recommended.

---

EDIT:

Spring Version 3.1.0 will support XML profiles/Environment Abstraction which is similar to my solution and will enable the choice of configuration files for different environments/profiles.

Answer 2

I'd go with this version:

ContextConfiguration(locations = { "/my_spring_test.xml" })
public abstract class AbstractMyTestCase extends AbstractJUnit4SpringContextTests

and in my_spring_test.xml, I'd use the PropertyPlaceHolderConfigurer mechanism.

Example for JPA:

<context:property-placeholder
    system-properties-mode="OVERRIDE" 
    location="classpath:test.properties" />

<bean id="dataSource" class="org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource"
    destroy-method="close">
    <property name="driverClassName" value="${test.database.driver}" />
    <property name="url" value="${test.database.server}" />
    <property name="username" value="${test.database.user}" />
    <property name="password" value="${test.database.password}" />
</bean>

<bean id="entityManagerFactory"
    class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean">
    <property name="persistenceUnitName" value="test" />
    <property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource" />
    <property name="persistenceXmlLocation"
             value="classpath:META-INF/persistence.xml" />
    <property name="jpaVendorAdapter">
<bean class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.vendor.HibernateJpaVendorAdapter">
    <property name="showSql" value="false" />
    <property name="generateDdl" value="${test.database.update}" />
    <property name="database" value="${test.database.databasetype}" />
</bean>
    </property>
</bean>

Now all you need to do is have different versions of test.properties on the class path for in-memory and real integration tests (and of course the respective driver classes need to be present). You can even set system properties to overwrite the property values.

---

If you want to prepare this with maven, you will find that copying files with maven is not trivial. You will need a way to execute code, the standard choices being the maven-antrun-plugin and gmaven-maven-plugin.

Either way: have two configuration files, e.g. in src/main/config and add two plugin executions, one in phase generate-test-resources and one in phase pre-integration-test. Here's the GMaven version:

<plugin>
    <groupId>org.codehaus.gmaven</groupId>
    <artifactId>gmaven-plugin</artifactId>
    <version>1.3</version>
    <executions>
        <execution>
            <phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
            <goals>
                <goal>execute</goal>
            </goals>
            <configuration>
            <source>
            new File(
               pom.build.testOutputDirectory,
               "test.properties"
            ).text = new File(
                       pom.basedir,
                       "src/main/config/int-test.properties"
            ).text;
            </source>
            </configuration>
        </execution>
        <execution>
            <phase>generate-test-resources</phase>
            <goals>
                <goal>execute</goal>
            </goals>
            <configuration>
            <source>
            new File(
               pom.build.testOutputDirectory,
               "test.properties"
            ).text = new File(
                       pom.basedir,
                       "src/main/config/memory-test.properties"
            ).text;
            </source>
            </configuration>
        </execution>
    </executions>
</plugin>

Answer 3

I have had no success in using Spring 3.x context:property-placeholder tag. I have used the old fashion bean tag along with a properties file and was able to set up a connection between my code and my database like so:

<bean class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer">
    <property name="location" value="/com/my/package/database.properties"/>
</bean>


<bean id="myDatasource" class="oracle.ucp.jdbc.PoolDataSourceFactory" 
    factory-method="getPoolDataSource">
    <property name="URL" value="${JDBC_URL}"/>
    <property name="user" value="${JDBC_USERNAME}"/>
    <property name="password" value="${JDBC_PASSWORD}"/>
    <property name="connectionFactoryClassName"   
      value="oracle.jdbc.pool.OracleConnectionPoolDataSource"/>
    <property name="ConnectionPoolName" value="SCDB_POOL"/>
    <property name="MinPoolSize" value="5"/>
    <property name="MaxPoolSize" value="50"/>
    <property name="connectionWaitTimeout" value="30"/>
    <property name="maxStatements" value="100"/>
</bean>

Here's an example of the properties file:

JDBC_URL=jdbc:oracle:thin:@myDB:1521:mySchema
JDBC_USERNAME=username
JDBC_PASSWORD=password

Then I set up my JUnit test like so:

@ContextConfiguration(locations = {"/com/my/pkg/test-system-context.xml"})
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
public class HeaderDaoTest {

    @Autowired
    HeaderDao headerDao;

    @Test
    public void validateHeaderId() {
        int headerId = 0;

        headerId = headerDao.getHeaderId();

        assertNotSame(0,headerId);
    }

}

That worked for me, but everybody does things a little differently. Hope this helps.

Answer 4

I recently ran in to the same problem and looking at the documentation for the @ContextConfiguration annotation, I noticed the inheritLocations option.

By adding this to my class e.g.

@ContextConfiguration(locations = { "/my_spring_integration_test.xml" }, inheritLocations=false)
public class FooIntegrationTest extends FooTest

I found that I was able to override the ContextConfiguration as desired.