While upgrading my Artifactory server (free OSS version) from the version 5.2.0 to the latest 5.4.5, I was hit by an ARTIFACTORY_PID problem. After migrating from 5.3.2 to 5.4.0, the Artifactory server did not want to start anymore complaining about
PID file /var/opt/jfrog/run/artifactory.pid not readable (yet?) after start.
I found the only way around it is to remove the line export CATALINA_PID=$ARTIFACTORY_PID
from the setenv.sh
of the tomcat.
Note that upgrade from 5.2.0 to 5.3.2 went smoothly.
However, after upgrading from 5.4.0 to the latest 5.4.5 this trick does not work anymore. Now I get an error:
Job for artifactory.service failed because a configured resource limit was exceeded. See "systemctl status artifactory.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details.
And when executing service artifactory status
, I get:
● artifactory.service - Setup Systemd script for Artifactory in Tomcat Servlet Engine
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/artifactory.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled)
Active: activating (auto-restart) (Result: resources) since Tue 2017-07-25 09:40:10 CEST; 4s ago
Process: 31912 ExecStart=/opt/jfrog/artifactory/bin/artifactoryManage.sh start (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Jul 25 09:40:10 linux systemd[1]: Failed to start Setup Systemd script for Artifactory in Tomcat Servlet Engine.
Jul 25 09:40:10 linux systemd[1]: Unit artifactory.service entered failed state.
Jul 25 09:40:10 linux systemd[1]: artifactory.service failed.
In fact Artifactory is now running showing version 5.4.5, but I am not happy about all those errors above.
Plus I am a bit failing to understand the purpose of CATALINA_PID and/or ARTIFACTORY_PID. Why the tomcat was failing on the startup because of this file? What was wrong with the permissions? I think I did no extra actions before.
The only difference that before it was installed from an official downloaded rpm. But now using an official remote yum repo.
If I try to create an empty /var/opt/jfrog/run/artifactory.pid file, while Artifactory is running, it gets deleted. Who is deleting this file and why? Is it a standard tomcat behavior?
OS: CentOS 7, up to date.