I'm having a problem with an EMV MTIP contactless test and I don't understand why. The transaction is being accepted, but my test tool is displaying some failures around the cardholder verification and the CVM used (or not used).
The issues are:
TVR Byte 3, bit 8, expecting 0, Received 1 (cardholder verification was not successful)
CVM Results are equal to 3F0001, 5F0302/0 were expected
My understanding of this is both of these are saying no CVM occurred, although it should have. I don't understand why, as the amount of 3000 is above the CVM required limit. I have my terminal capabilities for contactless set to 60 B8 C8, which indicated support for:
- Plaintext on ICC
- Signature
- Enciphered PIN Offline
- No CVM Required
As I see it, 5F0302 would indicate the successful use of No CVM Required, where as 3F0001 indicates that CVM verification failed.
Can anyone shed some light on why this would happen, and if I'm doing something wrong?
A full log of the transaction is too big to include in the post, but can be found here: Pastebin Transaction Log
Edit 1: I'm fairly certain I'm loading the correct CAPK's. They're being loaded from an XML file as per the terminal vendor's example, with the following values:
<tag id="E2">
<tag id="DFC316">A000000004</tag>
<tag id="9F22">EF</tag>
<tag id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tag>
<tag id="DFC318">03</tag>
<tag id="DFC31A">21766EBB0EE122AFB65D7845B73DB46BAB65427A</tag>
</tag>
<tag id="E2">
<tag id="DFC316">A000000004</tag>
<tag id="9F22">F1</tag>
<tag id="DFC317">A0DCF4BDE19C3546B4B6F0414D174DDE294AABBB828C5A834D73AAE27C99B0B053A90278007239B6459FF0BBCD7B4B9C6C50AC02CE91368DA1BD21AAEADBC65347337D89B68F5C99A09D05BE02DD1F8C5BA20E2F13FB2A27C41D3F85CAD5CF6668E75851EC66EDBF98851FD4E42C44C1D59F5984703B27D5B9F21B8FA0D93279FBBF69E090642909C9EA27F898959541AA6757F5F624104F6E1D3A9532F2A6E51515AEAD1B43B3D7835088A2FAFA7BE7</tag>
<tag id="DFC318">03</tag>
<tag id="DFC31A">D8E68DA167AB5A85D8C3D55ECB9B0517A1A5B4BB</tag>
</tag>
<tag id="E2">
<tag id="DFC316">A000000004</tag>
<tag id="9F22">FA</tag>
<tag id="DFC317">A90FCD55AA2D5D9963E35ED0F440177699832F49C6BAB15CDAE5794BE93F934D4462D5D12762E48C38BA83D8445DEAA74195A301A102B2F114EADA0D180EE5E7A5C73E0C4E11F67A43DDAB5D55683B1474CC0627F44B8D3088A492FFAADAD4F42422D0E7013536C3C49AD3D0FAE96459B0F6B1B6056538A3D6D44640F94467B108867DEC40FAAECD740C00E2B7A8852D</tag>
<tag id="DFC318">03</tag>
<tag id="DFC31A">5BED4068D96EA16D2D77E03D6036FC7A160EA99C</tag>
</tag>
Edit 2: The Terminal Risk Managment Data in use is 0CB4000000000000, which shows support for:
- Contactless
- No CVM required
- On Device CVM
- Contact
- Plaintext PIN
- Signature
- Enciphered Offline
- On Device CVM
Edit 3: The terminal type as set in 9F35 is 22 = Attended, Offline with Online Capability
Edit 4: The TAC for Denial is all zeros. The TAC for Default and Online is FC50808800, indicating:
- Offline data authentication was not performed
- SDA failed
- ICC data missing
- Card appears on the terminal exception file
- DDA failed
- Combined DDA/AC generation failed
- Expired application
- Requested service not allowed for card product
- Cardholder verification not successful
- Transaction exceeds floor limit
- Merchant forced transaction online