Update
After I published this answer I noticed that defining it the way I presented Typescript stopped detecting fields of state
. I assume that's because I used any
as a type. I probably could manually define the type, but it sounds like repeating yourself to me. That's way for now I ended up with a function instead of extending a class (I would be glad for letting me know some other solution if someone knows it).
import { Store } from 'vuex'
import VueRouter from 'vue-router'
// ...
export default (router: VueRouter) => {
return new Store({
// router = Vue.observable(router) // You can either do that...
super({
state: {
// router // ... or add `router` to `store` if You need it to be reactive.
// ...
},
// ...
})
}
import Vue from 'vue'
import App from './App.vue'
import createStore from './store'
// ...
new Vue({
router,
store: createStore(router),
render: createElement => createElement(App)
}).$mount('#app')
Initial answer content
I personally just made a wrapper for a typical Store
class.
import { Store } from 'vuex'
import VueRouter from 'vue-router'
// ...
export default class extends Store<any> {
constructor (router: VueRouter) {
// router = Vue.observable(router) // You can either do that...
super({
state: {
// router // ... or add `router` to `store` if You need it to be reactive.
// ...
},
// ...
})
}
}
If You need $route
You can just use router.currentRoute
. Just remember You rather need router
reactive if You want Your getters
with router.currentRoute
to work as expected.
And in "main.ts" (or ".js") I just use it with new Store(router)
.
import Vue from 'vue'
import App from './App.vue'
import Store from './store'
// ...
new Vue({
router,
store: new Store(router),
render: createElement => createElement(App)
}).$mount('#app')