I think I've stumbled upon a bug in Excel - I'd really like to verify it with someone else though.
The bug occurs when reading the Workbook.VBProject.HelpFile property when the workbook has been opened with the opening application's .AutomationSecurity property set to ForceDisable. In that case this string property returns a (probably) malformed Unicode string, which VBA in turn displays with question marks. Running StrConv(..., vbUnicode) on it makes it readable again, but it sometimes looses the last character this way; this might indicate that the unicode string is indeed malformed or such, and that VBA therefore tries to convert it first and fails.
Steps to reproduce this behaviour:
- Create a new Excel workbook
- Go to it's VBA project (Alt-F11)
- Add a new code module and add some code to it (like e.g.
Dim a As Long) - Enter the project's properties (menu Tools... properties)
- Enter "description" as Project description and "abc.hlp" as Help file name
- Save the workbook as a .xlsb or .xlsm
- Close the workbook
- Create a new Excel workbook
- Go to it's VBA project (Alt-F11)
- Add a fresh new code module
- Paste the code below in it
- Adjust the path on the 1st line so it points to the file you created above
- Run the Test routine
The code to use:
Const csFilePath As String = "<path to your test workbook>"
Sub TestSecurity(testType As String, secondExcel As Application, security As MsoAutomationSecurity)
Dim theWorkbook As Workbook
secondExcel.AutomationSecurity = security
Set theWorkbook = secondExcel.Workbooks.Open(csFilePath)
Call MsgBox(testType & " - helpfile: " & theWorkbook.VBProject.HelpFile)
Call MsgBox(testType & " - helpfile converted: " & StrConv(theWorkbook.VBProject.HelpFile, vbUnicode))
Call MsgBox(testType & " - description: " & theWorkbook.VBProject.Description)
Call theWorkbook.Close(False)
End Sub
Sub Test()
Dim secondExcel As Excel.Application
Set secondExcel = New Excel.Application
Dim oldSecurity As MsoAutomationSecurity
oldSecurity = secondExcel.AutomationSecurity
Call TestSecurity("enabled macros", secondExcel, msoAutomationSecurityLow)
Call TestSecurity("disabled macros", secondExcel, msoAutomationSecurityForceDisable)
secondExcel.AutomationSecurity = oldSecurity
Call secondExcel.Quit
Set secondExcel = Nothing
End Sub
Conclusion when working from Excel 2010:
- .Description is always readable, no matter what (so it's not like all string properties behave this way)
- xlsb and xlsm files result in an unreadable .HelpFile only when macros are disabled
- xls files result in an unreadable .HelpFile in all cases (!)
It might be even weirder than that, since I swear I once even saw the questionmarks-version pop up in the VBE GUI when looking at such a project's properties, though I'm unable to reproduce that now.
I realize this is an edge case if ever there was one (except for the .xls treatment though), so it might just have been overlooked by Microsoft's QA department, but for my current project I have to get this working properly and consistently across Excel versions and workbook formats...
Could anyone else test this as well to verify my Excel installation isn't hosed? Preferably also with another Excel version, to see if that makes a difference?
Hopefully this won't get to be a tumbleweed like some of my other posts here :) Maybe "Tumbleweed generator" might be a nice badge to add...
UPDATE
I've expanded the list of properties to test just to see what else I could find, and of all the VBProject's properties (BuildFileName, Description, Filename, HelpContextID, HelpFile, Mode, Name, Protection and Type) only .HelpFile has this problem of being mangled when macros are off.
UPDATE 2
Porting the sample code to Word 2010 and running that exhibits exactly the same behaviour - the .HelpFile property is malformed when macros are disabled. Seems like the code responsible for this is Office-wide, probably in a shared VBA library module (as was to be expected TBH).
UPDATE 3
Just tested it on Excel 2007 and 2003, and both contain this bug as well. I haven't got an Excel XP installation to test it out on, but I can safely say that this issue already has a long history :)