I'm currently working on an MVC project and I'm trying to figure out how I might go about extending the routes of an existing Controller within an Area, specifically from another project.
For instance, I have a Controller with an area that looks like the following :
namespace MyProject.Areas.Foo.Controllers
{
[Authorize]
public class FooController : ApplicationController
{
//code
}
}
And what I would like to do, is be able to define another Controller, within a separate project that could extend this like so :
namespace MyOtherProject.Areas.Foo.Custom.Controllers
{
public class FooController : ApplicationController
{
public string Bar()
{
return "Bar";
}
}
}
Basically, I would like the controllers to almost function as if I was using the partial keyword (so that I could call any of the actions in the original or the new one).
The Main Problem
What I am really trying to accomplish is that I have a main project with several areas and another area of my solution with various client folders. I want to be able to essentially extend the base controllers for my main project and add client-specific actions within these client folders so that they can be used in the main project. I'm already doing this with certain MVC Views, but I was hoping I could accomplish it with controllers as well.
What I've tried
- I tried using the
partialkeyword on both declarations of the class, but since they are in different projects / assemblies, I don't think that works. - I defined a build event that would move the custom DLL into the
bindirectory of the main MVC project, but that didn't seem to work as expected. - I've tried various approaches for inheritance, hoping the new class would get picked up, but those didn't work (received the duplicate controller declaration error).
- I've read about trying to use a custom
ControllerFactorybut I wasn't sure how to implement it. - I've tried defining custom namespace routing parameters in the AreaRegistration section to pick up the new controller like the following example.
Routing Example (AreaRegistration)
context.MapRoute(
AreaName,
String.Format("{0}/{{action}}/{{id}}", AreaName),
new { controller = AreaName, action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional },
new[] {
String.Format("MyProject.Areas.{0}.Controllers", AreaName),
String.Format("MyOtherProject.Areas.{0}.Custom.Controllers", AreaName)
}
);
Update
I attempted an approach seen here as per some of the comments discussion that involved simply handling this via inheritance :
// Main Project
namespace MyProject.Areas.Foo.Controllers
{
[Authorize]
public class FooController : ApplicationController
{
public ActionResult Index()
{
return View();
}
}
}
// This is in another project / namespace / assembly
namespace MyOtherProject.Foo.Controllers
{
public class CustomFooController : MyProject.Areas.Foo.Controllers.FooController
{
[Route("Foo/Bar")]
public string Bar()
{
return "Bar";
}
}
}
So my current steps are as follows :
- Inherited from the base
FooControllerin the main project within another project / solution. - Set up attribute routing to access the custom controller to avoid conflicting routes from the main project.
- Created a Build Event that moves the custom DLL into the main project when built (so it will be accessible) from the new custom project.
This didn't seem to make any difference. I tried going to the Foo/Bar url but it just threw a 404 as if it didn't see it at all. The CustomFooController.cs file is in it's own separate project and is just a class file and not an MVC project. Is this correct? Do I need to set the routing rules in the main project?



FooControllerin Project A? If so, how would this affect my routing as I want to be able to use the same basic routing i.e.Foo/ProjectAActionorFoo/ProjectBAction. Would that still work? - Thomas Johnson/controller/actionrouting convention. With attribute routing, you can make the routes whatever the heck you want, and the controller/action names no longer matter. - Chris PrattFoo/Barto access it right? AndFoo/Indexand everything else from the first one should work? - Thomas Johnson