We have REST services protected with Oauth2 Client credentials scheme. The Resource and authorization service are running in the same app, but can be split into different apps.
@Configuration
public class SecurityConfig {
@Configuration
@EnableResourceServer
protected static class ResourceServer extends ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter {
// Identifies this resource server. Usefull if the AuthorisationServer authorises multiple Resource servers
private static final String RESOURCE_ID = "*****";
@Resource(name = "OAuth")
@Autowired
DataSource dataSource;
@Override
public void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
// @formatter:off
http
.authorizeRequests().anyRequest().authenticated();
// @formatter:on
}
@Override
public void configure(ResourceServerSecurityConfigurer resources) throws Exception {
resources.resourceId(RESOURCE_ID);
resources.tokenStore(tokenStore());
}
@Bean
public TokenStore tokenStore() {
return new JdbcTokenStore(dataSource);
}
}
@Configuration
@EnableAuthorizationServer
protected static class AuthorizationServerConfiguration extends AuthorizationServerConfigurerAdapter {
@Resource(name = "OAuth")
@Autowired
DataSource dataSource;
@Bean
public TokenStore tokenStore() {
return new JdbcTokenStore(dataSource);
}
@Override
public void configure(AuthorizationServerEndpointsConfigurer endpoints) throws Exception {
endpoints.tokenStore(tokenStore());
}
@Override
public void configure(ClientDetailsServiceConfigurer clients) throws Exception {
clients.jdbc(dataSource);
}
}
}
Datasource config for the Oauth2 tables:
@Bean(name = "OAuth")
@ConfigurationProperties(prefix="datasource.oauth")
public DataSource secondaryDataSource() {
return DataSourceBuilder.create().build();
}
Communicating with authentication & resource server goes as followed
curl -H "Accept: application/json" user:password@localhost:8080/oauth/token -d grant_type=client_credentials
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer token" localhost:8080/...
The following record is present in the Oauth2 Database:
client_id resource_ids client_secret scope authorized_grant_types web_server_redirect_uri authorities access_token_validity refresh_token_validity additional_information autoapprove
user **** password NULL client_credentials NULL X NULL NULL NULL NULL
Resttemplate configuration in client application
@Configuration
@EnableOAuth2Client
public class OAuthConfig {
@Value("${OAuth2ClientId}")
private String oAuth2ClientId;
@Value("${OAuth2ClientSecret}")
private String oAuth2ClientSecret;
@Value("${Oauth2AccesTokenUri}")
private String accessTokenUri;
@Bean
public RestTemplate oAuthRestTemplate() {
ClientCredentialsResourceDetails resourceDetails = new ClientCredentialsResourceDetails();
resourceDetails.setId("1");
resourceDetails.setClientId(oAuth2ClientId);
resourceDetails.setClientSecret(oAuth2ClientSecret);
resourceDetails.setAccessTokenUri(accessTokenUri);
/*
When using @EnableOAuth2Client spring creates a OAuth2ClientContext for us:
"The OAuth2ClientContext is placed (for you) in session scope to keep the state for different users separate.
Without that you would have to manage the equivalent data structure yourself on the server,
mapping incoming requests to users, and associating each user with a separate instance of the OAuth2ClientContext."
(http://projects.spring.io/spring-security-oauth/docs/oauth2.html#client-configuration)
Internally the SessionScope works with a threadlocal to store variables, hence a new thread cannot access those.
Therefore we can not use @Async
Solution: create a new OAuth2ClientContext that has no scope.
*Note: this is only safe when using client_credentials as OAuth grant type!
*/
// OAuth2RestTemplate restTemplate = new OAuth2RestTemplate(resourceDetails, oauth2ClientContext);
OAuth2RestTemplate restTemplate = new OAuth2RestTemplate(resourceDetails, new DefaultOAuth2ClientContext());
return restTemplate;
}
}
You can inject the restTemplate to talk (Asynchronously) to the Oauth2 secured service.
We do not use scope at the moment.