I recently started using Entity Framework 6's code-first custom migrations. It's working well, but one thing I'd like to do is generate a pair of CreateIndex()
and DropIndex()
statements when attempting to rename an index, instead of using RenameIndex()
like the default CSharpMigrationCodeGenerator
wants to.
For example, I currently use data annotations in a fluent mapping to rename an index like this:
Property(x => x.TeacherId).HasColumnAnnotation("Index", new IndexAnnotation(new IndexAttribute("IX_Students_TeacherId")));
The problem here is that by default EF6 wants to generate the following code when I add a new migration to capture this change to the model:
using System;
using System.Data.Entity.Migrations;
namespace MyApp.Migrations
{
public partial class RenameIndexTest : DbMigration
{
public override void Up()
{
// BAD: [RenameIndex] will generate a "EXEC sp_rename" statement.
RenameIndex(table: "dbo.Students", name: "IX_TeacherId", newName: "IX_Students_TeacherId");
}
public override void Down()
{
RenameIndex(table: "dbo.Students", name: "IX_Students_TeacherId", newName: "IX_TeacherId");
}
}
}
But what I really need EF6 to generate is this:
using System;
using System.Data.Entity.Migrations;
namespace MyApp.Migrations
{
public partial class RenameIndexTest : DbMigration
{
public override void Up()
{
// GOOD: We generate separate SQL statements to drop & add the index.
DropIndex(table: "dbo.Students", name: "IX_TeacherId");
CreateIndex(table: "dbo.Students", name: "IX_Students_TeacherId", column: "TeacherId");
}
public override void Down()
{
DropIndex(table: "dbo.Students", name: "IX_Students_TeacherId");
CreateIndex(table: "dbo.Students", name: "IX_TeacherId", column: "TeacherId");
}
}
}
Our data team has a hard requirement that developers use T-SQL DROP
/CREATE
statements when renaming indexes. Thus far, I haven't been able to find a way to override the behavior of the RenameIndex()
statement, using a custom class that uses CSharpMigrationCodeGenerator
as its base class, because the RenameIndexOperation
class doesn't have any information about the column(s) an index has been created on.
This is as far as I've been able to get on my own:
namespace MyApp.Migrations
{
internal class CustomCSharpMigrationCodeGenerator : CSharpMigrationCodeGenerator
{
protected override string Generate(IEnumerable<MigrationOperation> operations, string @namespace, string className)
{
var customizedOperations = new List<MigrationOperation>();
foreach (var operation in operations)
{
if (operation is RenameIndexOperation)
{
var renameIndexOperation = operation as RenameIndexOperation;
var dropIndexOperation = new DropIndexOperation(operation.AnonymousArguments)
{
Table = renameIndexOperation.Table,
Name = renameIndexOperation.Name
};
var createIndexOperation = new CreateIndexOperation(operation.AnonymousArguments)
{
Table = renameIndexOperation.Table,
Name = renameIndexOperation.NewName,
// HELP: How do I get this information about the existing index?
// HELP: How do I specify what columns the index should be created on?
IsUnique = false,
IsClustered = false
};
// Do not generate a RenameIndex() statement; instead, generate a pair of DropIndex() and CreateIndex() statements.
customizedOperations.Add(dropIndexOperation);
customizedOperations.Add(createIndexOperation);
}
else
{
customizedOperations.Add(operation);
}
}
return base.Generate(customizedOperations, @namespace, className);
}
}
}
Does this make sense? And more importantly, does anyone have any suggestions or ideas on how to proceed? Either way, thanks in advance!
RenameIndexOperation
, notCreateIndexOperation
. The index already exists before I add my migration to set it properly. Also,CreateIndexOperation
inherits fromIndexOperation
, which exposes the Columns property I need. However, RenameIndexOperation inherits from MigrationOperation, which does not expose it. – Mass Dot NetRenameIndexOperation
as a pair ofDropIndexOperation
andCreateIndexOperation
operations. Simply intercepting myCreateIndexOperation
won't work. – Mass Dot Net