As already answered by the others, I do not think you can proceed to the next iteration without returning something using the *apply
family of functions.
In such cases, I use Dean MacGregor's method, with a small change: I use NA
instead of NULL
, which makes filtering the results easier.
files <- list("file1.txt", "file2.txt", "file3.txt")
parse_file <- function(file) {
if(file.exists(file)) {
readLines(file)
} else {
NA
}
}
results <- lapply(files, parse_file)
results <- results[!is.na(results)]
A quick benchmark
res_na <- list("a", NA, "c")
res_null <- list("a", NULL, "c")
microbenchmark::microbenchmark(
na = res_na[!is.na(res_na)],
null = res_null[!vapply(res_null, is.null, logical(1))]
)
illustrates that the NA
solution is quite a bit faster than the solution that uses NULL
:
Unit: nanoseconds
expr min lq mean median uq max neval
na 0 1 410.78 446 447 5355 100
null 3123 3570 5283.72 3570 4017 75861 100
lapply
. – RHertel