73
votes

Take the following trivial program:

#include <iostream>
int main() {
  return 0;
}

If I run this using valgrind, I'm told that there are 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks that are still reachable. There have been extensive discussions on SO about whether or not to worry about still reachable warnings--I'm not concerned about that. I'd just like to understand how simply including a standard library header could cause a still reachable warning, when none of the objects from that library were allocated in the program itself.

Here is the full valgrind output:

$ valgrind --leak-check=full --track-origins=yes --show-reachable=yes ./ValgrindTest
==27671== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==27671== Copyright (C) 2002-2013, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==27671== Using Valgrind-3.10.1 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==27671== Command: ./ValgrindTest
==27671== 
==27671== 
==27671== HEAP SUMMARY:
==27671==     in use at exit: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks
==27671==   total heap usage: 1 allocs, 0 frees, 72,704 bytes allocated
==27671== 
==27671== 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1
==27671==    at 0x4C2AB9D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:296)
==27671==    by 0x4EC060F: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21)
==27671==    by 0x400F305: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:85)
==27671==    by 0x400F3DE: call_init (dl-init.c:52)
==27671==    by 0x400F3DE: _dl_init (dl-init.c:134)
==27671==    by 0x40016E9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so)
==27671== 
==27671== LEAK SUMMARY:
==27671==    definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==27671==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==27671==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==27671==    still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks
==27671==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==27671== 
==27671== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==27671== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)

And an object dump:

$ objdump -d ValgrindTest 

ValgrindTest:     file format elf64-x86-64


Disassembly of section .init:

0000000000400718 <_init>:
  400718:   48 83 ec 08             sub    $0x8,%rsp
  40071c:   e8 8b 00 00 00          callq  4007ac <call_gmon_start>
  400721:   48 83 c4 08             add    $0x8,%rsp
  400725:   c3                      retq   

Disassembly of section .plt:

0000000000400730 <_ZNSt8ios_base4InitC1Ev@plt-0x10>:
  400730:   ff 35 ba 08 20 00       pushq  0x2008ba(%rip)        # 600ff0 <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0x8>
  400736:   ff 25 bc 08 20 00       jmpq   *0x2008bc(%rip)        # 600ff8 <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0x10>
  40073c:   0f 1f 40 00             nopl   0x0(%rax)

0000000000400740 <_ZNSt8ios_base4InitC1Ev@plt>:
  400740:   ff 25 ba 08 20 00       jmpq   *0x2008ba(%rip)        # 601000 <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0x18>
  400746:   68 00 00 00 00          pushq  $0x0
  40074b:   e9 e0 ff ff ff          jmpq   400730 <_init+0x18>

0000000000400750 <__libc_start_main@plt>:
  400750:   ff 25 b2 08 20 00       jmpq   *0x2008b2(%rip)        # 601008 <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0x20>
  400756:   68 01 00 00 00          pushq  $0x1
  40075b:   e9 d0 ff ff ff          jmpq   400730 <_init+0x18>

0000000000400760 <__cxa_atexit@plt>:
  400760:   ff 25 aa 08 20 00       jmpq   *0x2008aa(%rip)        # 601010 <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0x28>
  400766:   68 02 00 00 00          pushq  $0x2
  40076b:   e9 c0 ff ff ff          jmpq   400730 <_init+0x18>

0000000000400770 <_ZNSt8ios_base4InitD1Ev@plt>:
  400770:   ff 25 a2 08 20 00       jmpq   *0x2008a2(%rip)        # 601018 <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0x30>
  400776:   68 03 00 00 00          pushq  $0x3
  40077b:   e9 b0 ff ff ff          jmpq   400730 <_init+0x18>

Disassembly of section .text:

0000000000400780 <_start>:
  400780:   31 ed                   xor    %ebp,%ebp
  400782:   49 89 d1                mov    %rdx,%r9
  400785:   5e                      pop    %rsi
  400786:   48 89 e2                mov    %rsp,%rdx
  400789:   48 83 e4 f0             and    $0xfffffffffffffff0,%rsp
  40078d:   50                      push   %rax
  40078e:   54                      push   %rsp
  40078f:   49 c7 c0 80 09 40 00    mov    $0x400980,%r8
  400796:   48 c7 c1 f0 08 40 00    mov    $0x4008f0,%rcx
  40079d:   48 c7 c7 90 08 40 00    mov    $0x400890,%rdi
  4007a4:   e8 a7 ff ff ff          callq  400750 <__libc_start_main@plt>
  4007a9:   f4                      hlt    
  4007aa:   90                      nop
  4007ab:   90                      nop

00000000004007ac <call_gmon_start>:
  4007ac:   48 83 ec 08             sub    $0x8,%rsp
  4007b0:   48 8b 05 29 08 20 00    mov    0x200829(%rip),%rax        # 600fe0 <_DYNAMIC+0x1f0>
  4007b7:   48 85 c0                test   %rax,%rax
  4007ba:   74 02                   je     4007be <call_gmon_start+0x12>
  4007bc:   ff d0                   callq  *%rax
  4007be:   48 83 c4 08             add    $0x8,%rsp
  4007c2:   c3                      retq   
  4007c3:   90                      nop
  4007c4:   90                      nop
  4007c5:   90                      nop
  4007c6:   90                      nop
  4007c7:   90                      nop
  4007c8:   90                      nop
  4007c9:   90                      nop
  4007ca:   90                      nop
  4007cb:   90                      nop
  4007cc:   90                      nop
  4007cd:   90                      nop
  4007ce:   90                      nop
  4007cf:   90                      nop

00000000004007d0 <deregister_tm_clones>:
  4007d0:   b8 37 10 60 00          mov    $0x601037,%eax
  4007d5:   55                      push   %rbp
  4007d6:   48 2d 30 10 60 00       sub    $0x601030,%rax
  4007dc:   48 83 f8 0e             cmp    $0xe,%rax
  4007e0:   48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
  4007e3:   77 02                   ja     4007e7 <deregister_tm_clones+0x17>
  4007e5:   5d                      pop    %rbp
  4007e6:   c3                      retq   
  4007e7:   b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax
  4007ec:   48 85 c0                test   %rax,%rax
  4007ef:   74 f4                   je     4007e5 <deregister_tm_clones+0x15>
  4007f1:   5d                      pop    %rbp
  4007f2:   bf 30 10 60 00          mov    $0x601030,%edi
  4007f7:   ff e0                   jmpq   *%rax
  4007f9:   0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00    nopl   0x0(%rax)

0000000000400800 <register_tm_clones>:
  400800:   b8 30 10 60 00          mov    $0x601030,%eax
  400805:   55                      push   %rbp
  400806:   48 2d 30 10 60 00       sub    $0x601030,%rax
  40080c:   48 c1 f8 03             sar    $0x3,%rax
  400810:   48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
  400813:   48 89 c2                mov    %rax,%rdx
  400816:   48 c1 ea 3f             shr    $0x3f,%rdx
  40081a:   48 01 d0                add    %rdx,%rax
  40081d:   48 d1 f8                sar    %rax
  400820:   75 02                   jne    400824 <register_tm_clones+0x24>
  400822:   5d                      pop    %rbp
  400823:   c3                      retq   
  400824:   ba 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%edx
  400829:   48 85 d2                test   %rdx,%rdx
  40082c:   74 f4                   je     400822 <register_tm_clones+0x22>
  40082e:   5d                      pop    %rbp
  40082f:   48 89 c6                mov    %rax,%rsi
  400832:   bf 30 10 60 00          mov    $0x601030,%edi
  400837:   ff e2                   jmpq   *%rdx
  400839:   0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00    nopl   0x0(%rax)

0000000000400840 <__do_global_dtors_aux>:
  400840:   80 3d e9 07 20 00 00    cmpb   $0x0,0x2007e9(%rip)        # 601030 <__bss_start>
  400847:   75 11                   jne    40085a <__do_global_dtors_aux+0x1a>
  400849:   55                      push   %rbp
  40084a:   48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
  40084d:   e8 7e ff ff ff          callq  4007d0 <deregister_tm_clones>
  400852:   5d                      pop    %rbp
  400853:   c6 05 d6 07 20 00 01    movb   $0x1,0x2007d6(%rip)        # 601030 <__bss_start>
  40085a:   f3 c3                   repz retq 
  40085c:   0f 1f 40 00             nopl   0x0(%rax)

0000000000400860 <frame_dummy>:
  400860:   48 83 3d 80 05 20 00    cmpq   $0x0,0x200580(%rip)        # 600de8 <__JCR_END__>
  400867:   00 
  400868:   74 1e                   je     400888 <frame_dummy+0x28>
  40086a:   b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax
  40086f:   48 85 c0                test   %rax,%rax
  400872:   74 14                   je     400888 <frame_dummy+0x28>
  400874:   55                      push   %rbp
  400875:   bf e8 0d 60 00          mov    $0x600de8,%edi
  40087a:   48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
  40087d:   ff d0                   callq  *%rax
  40087f:   5d                      pop    %rbp
  400880:   e9 7b ff ff ff          jmpq   400800 <register_tm_clones>
  400885:   0f 1f 00                nopl   (%rax)
  400888:   e9 73 ff ff ff          jmpq   400800 <register_tm_clones>
  40088d:   90                      nop
  40088e:   90                      nop
  40088f:   90                      nop

0000000000400890 <main>:
  400890:   55                      push   %rbp
  400891:   48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
  400894:   b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax
  400899:   5d                      pop    %rbp
  40089a:   c3                      retq   

000000000040089b <_Z41__static_initialization_and_destruction_0ii>:
  40089b:   55                      push   %rbp
  40089c:   48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
  40089f:   48 83 ec 10             sub    $0x10,%rsp
  4008a3:   89 7d fc                mov    %edi,-0x4(%rbp)
  4008a6:   89 75 f8                mov    %esi,-0x8(%rbp)
  4008a9:   83 7d fc 01             cmpl   $0x1,-0x4(%rbp)
  4008ad:   75 27                   jne    4008d6 <_Z41__static_initialization_and_destruction_0ii+0x3b>
  4008af:   81 7d f8 ff ff 00 00    cmpl   $0xffff,-0x8(%rbp)
  4008b6:   75 1e                   jne    4008d6 <_Z41__static_initialization_and_destruction_0ii+0x3b>
  4008b8:   bf 34 10 60 00          mov    $0x601034,%edi
  4008bd:   e8 7e fe ff ff          callq  400740 <_ZNSt8ios_base4InitC1Ev@plt>
  4008c2:   ba 28 10 60 00          mov    $0x601028,%edx
  4008c7:   be 34 10 60 00          mov    $0x601034,%esi
  4008cc:   bf 70 07 40 00          mov    $0x400770,%edi
  4008d1:   e8 8a fe ff ff          callq  400760 <__cxa_atexit@plt>
  4008d6:   c9                      leaveq 
  4008d7:   c3                      retq   

00000000004008d8 <_GLOBAL__sub_I_main>:
  4008d8:   55                      push   %rbp
  4008d9:   48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
  4008dc:   be ff ff 00 00          mov    $0xffff,%esi
  4008e1:   bf 01 00 00 00          mov    $0x1,%edi
  4008e6:   e8 b0 ff ff ff          callq  40089b <_Z41__static_initialization_and_destruction_0ii>
  4008eb:   5d                      pop    %rbp
  4008ec:   c3                      retq   
  4008ed:   90                      nop
  4008ee:   90                      nop
  4008ef:   90                      nop

00000000004008f0 <__libc_csu_init>:
  4008f0:   48 89 6c 24 d8          mov    %rbp,-0x28(%rsp)
  4008f5:   4c 89 64 24 e0          mov    %r12,-0x20(%rsp)
  4008fa:   48 8d 2d df 04 20 00    lea    0x2004df(%rip),%rbp        # 600de0 <__init_array_end>
  400901:   4c 8d 25 c8 04 20 00    lea    0x2004c8(%rip),%r12        # 600dd0 <__frame_dummy_init_array_entry>
  400908:   4c 89 6c 24 e8          mov    %r13,-0x18(%rsp)
  40090d:   4c 89 74 24 f0          mov    %r14,-0x10(%rsp)
  400912:   4c 89 7c 24 f8          mov    %r15,-0x8(%rsp)
  400917:   48 89 5c 24 d0          mov    %rbx,-0x30(%rsp)
  40091c:   48 83 ec 38             sub    $0x38,%rsp
  400920:   4c 29 e5                sub    %r12,%rbp
  400923:   41 89 fd                mov    %edi,%r13d
  400926:   49 89 f6                mov    %rsi,%r14
  400929:   48 c1 fd 03             sar    $0x3,%rbp
  40092d:   49 89 d7                mov    %rdx,%r15
  400930:   e8 e3 fd ff ff          callq  400718 <_init>
  400935:   48 85 ed                test   %rbp,%rbp
  400938:   74 1c                   je     400956 <__libc_csu_init+0x66>
  40093a:   31 db                   xor    %ebx,%ebx
  40093c:   0f 1f 40 00             nopl   0x0(%rax)
  400940:   4c 89 fa                mov    %r15,%rdx
  400943:   4c 89 f6                mov    %r14,%rsi
  400946:   44 89 ef                mov    %r13d,%edi
  400949:   41 ff 14 dc             callq  *(%r12,%rbx,8)
  40094d:   48 83 c3 01             add    $0x1,%rbx
  400951:   48 39 eb                cmp    %rbp,%rbx
  400954:   75 ea                   jne    400940 <__libc_csu_init+0x50>
  400956:   48 8b 5c 24 08          mov    0x8(%rsp),%rbx
  40095b:   48 8b 6c 24 10          mov    0x10(%rsp),%rbp
  400960:   4c 8b 64 24 18          mov    0x18(%rsp),%r12
  400965:   4c 8b 6c 24 20          mov    0x20(%rsp),%r13
  40096a:   4c 8b 74 24 28          mov    0x28(%rsp),%r14
  40096f:   4c 8b 7c 24 30          mov    0x30(%rsp),%r15
  400974:   48 83 c4 38             add    $0x38,%rsp
  400978:   c3                      retq   
  400979:   0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00    nopl   0x0(%rax)

0000000000400980 <__libc_csu_fini>:
  400980:   f3 c3                   repz retq 
  400982:   90                      nop
  400983:   90                      nop

Disassembly of section .fini:

0000000000400984 <_fini>:
  400984:   48 83 ec 08             sub    $0x8,%rsp
  400988:   48 83 c4 08             add    $0x8,%rsp
  40098c:   c3                      retq   

For completeness, I'm using:
Ubuntu: 12.04
Valgrind: 3.10.1 3.7.0
g++: 4.8.1

NB: As a side note, this does not happen when I include other headers such as <fstream> or <cmath>.

3
ubuntu 14.04, g++ 4.8.2, valgrind 3.10.0 and no leaks! Probably needs valgrind upgrade.doqtor
You're ahead of me on all fronts! I wonder which update fixed it. Unfortunately I can't update Ubuntu at the moment.sudo make install
You should probably paste the full valgrind output. Also make sure you run with --leak-check=full and --track-origins=yes for better informationmjs
No leak is shown by the leak sanitizer of gcc/clang (-fsanitize=leak)edmz
Hi PyNewb, I have the same problem on my arch linux system. Exactly the same number of bytes in 1 block, both for a trivial test case like your show, and a larger application which was memory leak free recently. Very curious indeed!bcumming

3 Answers

59
votes

It's Valgrind's fault. First, -fsanitize=leak does not show anything. Second, Valgrind itself states that:

First of all: relax, it's probably not a bug, but a feature. Many implementations of the C++ standard libraries use their own memory pool allocators. Memory for quite a number of destructed objects is not immediately freed and given back to the OS, but kept in the pool(s) for later re-use. The fact that the pools are not freed at the exit of the program cause Valgrind to report this memory as still reachable. The behaviour not to free pools at the exit could be called a bug of the library though.

Using GCC, you can force the STL to use malloc and to free memory as soon as possible by globally disabling memory caching. Beware! Doing so will probably slow down your program, sometimes drastically.

With GCC 2.91, 2.95, 3.0 and 3.1, compile all source using the STL with -D__USE_MALLOC. Beware! This was removed from GCC starting with version 3.3.

With GCC 3.2.2 and later, you should export the environment variable GLIBCPP_FORCE_NEW before running your program.

With GCC 3.4 and later, that variable has changed name to GLIBCXX_FORCE_NEW.

[...]

I guess those alleged memory pools are freed after program's termination, in the so-called start-up code that calls main, among the other settings. Internal functions defined outside user's code should be treated as if they didn't exist, that's why Valgrind can't (and shouldn't) see further frees.

8
votes

Consider the following trivial include file:

#ifndef TRIVIAL_INCLUDE_FILE
#define TRIVIAL_INCLUDE_FILE
static int *x = new x (0);
#endif
6
votes

For gcc 6 and higher, a related bug fix arrived:

With gcc 5, you can also get the same warning without including iostream.

So, if you see a similar warning referring to dl-init.c and you are using gcc 5, consider upgrading to a newer version (gcc >=6), or try to compile with clang.