ers! There are several posts discussing how to react on:
brew doctor
i.e., to some warnings. See, for example:
Brew doctor - “warning: unbrewed header files were found in /usr/local/include”?
Best Practices for dealing with unbrewed files in a fresh install of homebrew
...
In my case (and I just started playing with the Homebrew on my Mac OSX), in summary it says:
- Unexpected dylibs (in /usr/local/lib/)
- Unexpected header files (in /usr/local/include/c++/4.9.0/, /usr/local/include/c++/5.0.0/, /usr/local/include/JAGS/, /usr/local/include/ntfs/, /usr/local/include/ntfs-3g/ etc.)
- Unbrewed .la files (in /usr/local/lib/)
- Unbrewed .pc files (in /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/), which may actually list unbrewed stuffs:
- /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/fuse-ext2.pc
- /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/jags.pc
- /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/libntfs-3g.pc
- /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/libublio.pc
- /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/tcl.pc
- /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/tk.pc
- and some static libraries (in /usr/local/lib/)
Thus, my question is, again, how to react? In particular, how worrisome is "collision" between Anaconda and Homebrew? Also, I am concerned about the effect on JAGS (which is not so widely used as Anaconda, but still...).
All systematic views are more then welcomed!
Many thanks, PM
anaconda
here. I think the first sentence of the output ofbrew doctor
applies here:[...] If everything you use Homebrew for is working fine: please don't worry and just ignore them.
– celbrew doctor
and I also get warnings aboutconfig
scripts outside ofhomebrew
's reach. I think there is no need to be worried. In fact I haven't encountered a situation where this led to an interference. – cel