155
votes

How do you define a static extension method in Kotlin? Is this even possible? I currently have an extension method as shown below.

public fun Uber.doMagic(context: Context) {
    // ...
}

The above extension can be invoked on an instance.

uberInstance.doMagic(context) // Instance method

but how do I make it static method like shown below.

Uber.doMagic(context)         // Static or class method
9
What do you mean by "static extension method"?Andrey Breslav
A method that I can call without an instance, but is still an extension of the class. (Regular Java static methods)Ragunath Jawahar
I think it might not be the intended usage of the Kotlin extensions good question, I thought about the same thing while trying to extrapolate the C# concept . But while in practice the usage is quite similar. Kotlin extensions ,while they claim to be statically dispatched , they feel like dynamically "attached" , if there is such a thing, or late bounded to the instance. If I'm not mistaken ... or perhaps I got it completely wrong :)Dan
Currently you can not write an extension method that would be called on a class name as opposed to class instance. Indeed, extension function take a receiver parameter that is an instance, so there's no way to skip this part. On the other hand, we are working on a way of writing extensions to class objects, so that you call it on a class name, but the receiver has the type of the class objectAndrey Breslav
@AndreyBreslav Can you update us whether static extension functions will be allowed? I'm missing it, too.Lars Blumberg

9 Answers

162
votes

To achieve Uber.doMagic(context), you can write an extension to the companion object of Uber (the companion object declaration is required):

class Uber {
    companion object {}
}

fun Uber.Companion.doMagic(context: Context) { }
13
votes

This is what the official documentation says:

Kotlin generates static methods for package-level functions. Kotlin can also generate static methods for functions defined in named objects or companion objects if you annotate those functions as @JvmStatic. For example:

Kotlin static methods

class C {
  companion object {
    @JvmStatic fun foo() {}
    fun bar() {}
  }
}

Now, foo() is static in Java, while bar() is not:

C.foo(); // works fine
C.bar(); // error: not a static method
8
votes

I actually had this exact question 30 minutes ago, so I started digging around and couldn't find any solution or workaround for this, BUT while searching I found this section on the Kotlinglang website that states that:

Note that extensions can be defined with a nullable receiver type. Such extensions can be called on an object variable even if its value is null.

So then I had the craziest idea ever, why not define an extension function with a nullable receiver (without actually using that receiver) and then call it on a null object! So I tried that, and it worked pretty well, but it looked so ugly. It was like this:

(null as Type?).staticFunction(param1, param2)

So I went around that by creating a val in my extensions file of the receiver type that had a value of null and then use it in my other class. So, as an example, here is how I implemented a "static" extension function for the Navigation class in Android: In my NavigationExtensions.kt file:

val SNavigation: Navigation? = null
fun Navigation?.createNavigateOnClickListener(@IdRes resId: Int, args: Bundle? = null, navOptions: NavOptions? = null,
                                                navigationExtras: Navigator.Extras? = null) : (View) -> Unit {
    //This is just implementation details, don't worry too much about them, just focus on the Navigation? part in the method declaration
    return { view: View -> view.navigate(resId, args, navOptions, navigationExtras) }
}

In the code that uses it:

SNavigation.createNavigateOnClickListener(R.id.action_gameWonFragment_to_gameFragment)

Obviously, this isn't a class name, it is just a variable of the class type that has a null value. This is obviously ugly on the extension maker side (because they have to create the variable) and on the developer side (because they have to use the SType format instead of the actual class name), but it is the closest that can be achieved right now compared to actual static functions. Hopefully, the Kotlin language makers will respond to the issue that was created and add that feature in the language.

5
votes

You can create a static method with using Companion object like:

class Foo {
    // ...
    companion object {
        public fun bar() {
            // do anything
        }
    }
}

and then you can call it like:

class Baz {
    // ...
    private fun callBar() {
        Foo.bar()
    }
}
1
votes

Since I keep coming across this when searching, here's a different approach I haven't seen anyone mention that works in a static way and it works with generics!

Extension definitions:

// Extension function
fun <T> KClass<T>.doSomething() = /* do something */

// Extension Property
val <T> KClass<T>.someVal get() = /* something */

Usage:

MyType::class.doSomething()

MyType::class.someVal

As you can see, the trick is attaching the extension function to the KClass of the type instead since that can be referenced statically.

0
votes

Recomend you to look at this link. As you can see there, you just should declare method at the top-level of the package (file):

package strings
public fun joinToString(...): String { ... }

This is equal to

package strings;

public class JoinKt {
    public static String joinToString(...) { ... }
}

With constans everything are the same. This declaration

val UNIX_LINE_SEPARATOR = "\n"

is equal to

public static final String UNIX_LINE_SEPARATOR = "\n";
0
votes

I also required the ability to extend a Java object with a static method and found the best solution for me was to create a Kotlin object that extended the Java class and add my method there.

object Colour: Color(){
    fun parseColor(r: Int?, g: Int?, b: Int?) = parseColor(String.format("#%02x%02x%02x", r, g, b))
}

invocation:

val colour = Colour.parseColor(62, 0, 100)
-3
votes

I'm also quite fond of having the possibility to add static extension methods in Kotlin. As a workaround for now I'm adding the exntension method to multiple classes instead of using one static extension method in all of them.

class Util    

fun Util.isDeviceOnline(context: Context): Boolean {
    val connMgr = context.getSystemService(Context.CONNECTIVITY_SERVICE) as ConnectivityManager
    val networkInfo = connMgr.activeNetworkInfo
    return networkInfo != null && networkInfo.isConnected
}

fun Activity.isDeviceOnline(context: Context) = { Util().isDeviceOnline(context) }
fun OkHttpClient.isDeviceOnline(context: Context) = { Util().isDeviceOnline(context) }
-4
votes

To create an extension method in kotlin you have to create a kotlin file(not a class) then declare your method in the file Eg:

public fun String.toLowercase(){
    // **this** is the string object
}

Import the function in the class or file you are working on and use it.