24
votes

Is there a way to define a function to be global from within a class( or from within another function, as matter of fact)? Something similar to defining a global variable.

3
Why would you want to do that at all? - Martijn Pieters♦
You can assign a global variable a function defined locally, if that's what you mean - khelwood
I venture to propose a concrete use case for this: dynamical redefinition of functions aliases, based on user input. Eg, let's say you use bytearray() for optimization purposes, because all your values are assumed to be within 0 and 255. Now let's say that you want to support values above 255 in some cases, but you want to get maximum performance for cases when values are guaranteed to be bounded to 0..255. One way to do that is at my_setup_function() to redefine bytearray dynamically to a list() if needed. - gaborous
Can anyone explain why this was downvoted? I think it's a very valid question, I've just come across this issue myself. - Eddy
@Eddy: There are numerous valid reasons to do this (e.g., non-premature optimization as highlighted by @gaborous). Sadly, some Pythonistas believe that their personal failure to conceive of a valid use case for a requested solution implies all possible solutions to be harmful. See also: the snark radiating from Martijn Pieters' comment above. - Cecil Curry

3 Answers

35
votes

Functions are added to the current namespace like any other name would be added. That means you can use the global keyword inside a function or method:

def create_global_function():
    global foo
    def foo(): return 'bar'

The same applies to a class body or method:

class ClassWithGlobalFunction:
    global spam
    def spam(): return 'eggs'

    def method(self):
        global monty
        def monty(): return 'python'

with the difference that spam will be defined immediately as top-level class bodies are executed on import.

Like all uses of global you probably want to rethink the problem and find another way to solve it. You could return the function so created instead, for example.

Demo:

>>> def create_global_function():
...     global foo
...     def foo(): return 'bar'
... 
>>> foo
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
NameError: name 'foo' is not defined
>>> create_global_function()
>>> foo
<function foo at 0x102a0c7d0>
>>> foo()
'bar'
>>> class ClassWithGlobalFunction:
...     global spam
...     def spam(): return 'eggs'
...     def method(self):
...         global monty
...         def monty(): return 'python'
... 
>>> spam
<function spam at 0x102a0cb18>
>>> spam()
'eggs'
>>> monty
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
NameError: name 'monty' is not defined
>>> ClassWithGlobalFunction().method()
>>> monty()
'python'
9
votes

You can use global to declare a global function from within a class. The problem with doing that is you can not use it with a class scope so might as well declare it outside the class.

class X:
  global d
  def d():
    print 'I might be defined in a class, but I\'m global'

>> X.d

   Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
   AttributeError: 'X' object has no attribute 'd'

>> d()

I might be defined in a class, but I'm global
1
votes

I found a case where global does not have the desired effect: inside .pdbrc file. If you define functions in .pdbrc they will only be available from the stack frame from which pdb.set_trace() was called.

However, you can add a function globally, so that it will be available in all stack frames, by using an alternative syntax:

def cow(): print("I'm a cow")
globals()['cow']=cow

I've tested that it also works in place of the global keyword in at least the simplest case:

def fish():
    def cow(): 
        print("I'm a cow")
    globals()['cow']=cow

Despite being more verbose, I thought it was worth sharing this alternative syntax. I have not tested it extensively so I can't comment on its limitations vs using the global keyword.