Benefits of using BOOST shared_array over shared_ptr

Question

I want to use BOOST Smart pointer for memory management in my application. But I'm not sure which smart pointer should I use for dynamically allocated array shared_ptr or shared_array.

According to the BOOST doc Starting with Boost release 1.53, shared_ptr can be used to hold a pointer to a dynamically allocated array.

So I'm just wondering now what purpose user should use shared_array instead of shared_ptr.

Why not std::vector for dynamic arrays and std::unique_ptr for objects? — Maxim Egorushkin
I have a 3rd party library functions which are taking raw pointer as argument, so I can't use vector. — Hemant Gangwar
std::vector has the same contiguous layout like a plain array. std::vector::data() and &vec[0] allow you to extract the pointer to that array. — Maxim Egorushkin
True, but just curious is there any disadvantage to use vector over share_ptr. — Hemant Gangwar
Quite to the contrary, shared_ptr should only ever be used as a last resort option. — Maxim Egorushkin

Mine Mine · Accepted Answer · 2014-09-22T08:26:35

Before boost 1.53, boost::shared_ptr is to be used for a pointer to a single object.

After 1.53, since boost::shared_ptr can be used for array types, I think it's pretty much the same as boost::shared_array.

But for now I don't think it's a good idea to use array type in shared_ptr, because C++11's std::shared_ptr has a bit different behavior on array type compared to boost::shared_ptr.

See shared_ptr to an array : should it be used? as reference for the difference.

So if you want your code compatible with C++11 and use std::shared_ptr instead, you need to use it carefully. Because:

Code look like below gets compile error (you need a custom deleter), while boost's version is OK.

 std::shared_ptr<int[]> a(new int[5]); // Compile error

 // You need to write like below:
 std::shared_ptr<int> b(new int[5], std::default_delete<int[]>());

 boost::shared_ptr<int[]> c(new int[5]); // OK

However, if you write code like below, you are likely to get segment fault

 std::shared_ptr<T> a(new T[5]); // segment fault
 boost::shared_ptr<T> b(new T[5]); // segment fault

The syntax of shared_ptr in std and boost are different and not compatible.

Additional information: consider boost::ptr_vector, which is a pretty fast implementation for dynamic allocated objects in vector. Just FYI in case you want this feature.

Benefits of using BOOST shared_array over shared_ptr

1 Answers