974
votes

What is the prefered method for creating a byte array from an input stream?

Here is my current solution with .NET 3.5.

Stream s;
byte[] b;

using (BinaryReader br = new BinaryReader(s))
{
    b = br.ReadBytes((int)s.Length);
}

Is it still a better idea to read and write chunks of the stream?

16
Of course, another question is should you create a byte[] from a stream... for large data, it is preferable to treat the stream as, well, a stream!Marc Gravell♦
Indeed you should probably use a stream instead of a byte[]. But there are some system APIs that don't support streams. For example, you can't create a X509Certificate2 from a stream, you have to give it a byte[] (or a string). In this case it's fine since a x509 certificate is probably not large data.0xced
Doesn't the Binary Reader attach a UTF-8 encoding to the stream? Won't that be a problem if you aren't reading text (like if you're reading an image, etc)? docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/…JMarsch

16 Answers

1363
votes

It really depends on whether or not you can trust s.Length. For many streams, you just don't know how much data there will be. In such cases - and before .NET 4 - I'd use code like this:

public static byte[] ReadFully(Stream input)
{
    byte[] buffer = new byte[16*1024];
    using (MemoryStream ms = new MemoryStream())
    {
        int read;
        while ((read = input.Read(buffer, 0, buffer.Length)) > 0)
        {
            ms.Write(buffer, 0, read);
        }
        return ms.ToArray();
    }
}

With .NET 4 and above, I'd use Stream.CopyTo, which is basically equivalent to the loop in my code - create the MemoryStream, call stream.CopyTo(ms) and then return ms.ToArray(). Job done.

I should perhaps explain why my answer is longer than the others. Stream.Read doesn't guarantee that it will read everything it's asked for. If you're reading from a network stream, for example, it may read one packet's worth and then return, even if there will be more data soon. BinaryReader.Read will keep going until the end of the stream or your specified size, but you still have to know the size to start with.

The above method will keep reading (and copying into a MemoryStream) until it runs out of data. It then asks the MemoryStream to return a copy of the data in an array. If you know the size to start with - or think you know the size, without being sure - you can construct the MemoryStream to be that size to start with. Likewise you can put a check at the end, and if the length of the stream is the same size as the buffer (returned by MemoryStream.GetBuffer) then you can just return the buffer. So the above code isn't quite optimised, but will at least be correct. It doesn't assume any responsibility for closing the stream - the caller should do that.

See this article for more info (and an alternative implementation).

795
votes

While Jon's answer is correct, he is rewriting code that already exists in CopyTo. So for .Net 4 use Sandip's solution, but for previous version of .Net use Jon's answer. Sandip's code would be improved by use of "using" as exceptions in CopyTo are, in many situations, quite likely and would leave the MemoryStream not disposed.

public static byte[] ReadFully(Stream input)
{
    using (MemoryStream ms = new MemoryStream())
    {
        input.CopyTo(ms);
        return ms.ToArray();
    }
}
121
votes

Just want to point out that in case you have a MemoryStream you already have memorystream.ToArray() for that.

Also, if you are dealing with streams of unknown or different subtypes and you can receive a MemoryStream, you can relay on said method for those cases and still use the accepted answer for the others, like this:

public static byte[] StreamToByteArray(Stream stream)
{
    if (stream is MemoryStream)
    {
        return ((MemoryStream)stream).ToArray();                
    }
    else
    {
        // Jon Skeet's accepted answer 
        return ReadFully(stream);
    }
}
71
votes
MemoryStream ms = new MemoryStream();
file.PostedFile.InputStream.CopyTo(ms);
var byts = ms.ToArray();
ms.Dispose();
54
votes

just my couple cents... the practice that I often use is to organize the methods like this as a custom helper

public static class StreamHelpers
{
    public static byte[] ReadFully(this Stream input)
    {
        using (MemoryStream ms = new MemoryStream())
        {
            input.CopyTo(ms);
            return ms.ToArray();
        }
    }
}

add namespace to the config file and use it anywhere you wish

21
votes

You can simply use ToArray() method of MemoryStream class, for ex-

MemoryStream ms = (MemoryStream)dataInStream;
byte[] imageBytes = ms.ToArray();
11
votes

You can even make it fancier with extensions:

namespace Foo
{
    public static class Extensions
    {
        public static byte[] ToByteArray(this Stream stream)
        {
            using (stream)
            {
                using (MemoryStream memStream = new MemoryStream())
                {
                     stream.CopyTo(memStream);
                     return memStream.ToArray();
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

And then call it as a regular method:

byte[] arr = someStream.ToByteArray()
8
votes

I get a compile time error with Bob's (i.e. the questioner's) code. Stream.Length is a long whereas BinaryReader.ReadBytes takes an integer parameter. In my case, I do not expect to be dealing with Streams large enough to require long precision, so I use the following:

Stream s;
byte[] b;

if (s.Length > int.MaxValue) {
  throw new Exception("This stream is larger than the conversion algorithm can currently handle.");
}

using (var br = new BinaryReader(s)) {
  b = br.ReadBytes((int)s.Length);
}
7
votes

In case anyone likes it, here is a .NET 4+ only solution formed as an extension method without the needless Dispose call on the MemoryStream. This is a hopelessly trivial optimization, but it is worth noting that failing to Dispose a MemoryStream is not a real failure.

public static class StreamHelpers
{
    public static byte[] ReadFully(this Stream input)
    {
        var ms = new MemoryStream();
        input.CopyTo(ms);
        return ms.ToArray();
    }
}
4
votes

The one above is ok...but you will encounter data corruption when you send stuff over SMTP (if you need to). I've altered to something else that will help to correctly send byte for byte: '

using System;
using System.IO;

        private static byte[] ReadFully(string input)
        {
            FileStream sourceFile = new FileStream(input, FileMode.Open); //Open streamer
            BinaryReader binReader = new BinaryReader(sourceFile);
            byte[] output = new byte[sourceFile.Length]; //create byte array of size file
            for (long i = 0; i < sourceFile.Length; i++)
                output[i] = binReader.ReadByte(); //read until done
            sourceFile.Close(); //dispose streamer
            binReader.Close(); //dispose reader
            return output;
        }'
4
votes

In namespace RestSharp.Extensions there is method ReadAsBytes. Inside this method is used MemoryStream and there is the same code like in some examples on this page but when you are using RestSharp this is easiest way.

using RestSharp.Extensions;
var byteArray = inputStream.ReadAsBytes();
3
votes

Create a helper class and reference it anywhere you wish to use it.

public static class StreamHelpers
{
    public static byte[] ReadFully(this Stream input)
    {
        using (MemoryStream ms = new MemoryStream())
        {
            input.CopyTo(ms);
            return ms.ToArray();
        }
    }
}
3
votes

This is the function which I am using, tested and worked well. please bear in mind that 'input' should not be null and 'input.position' should reset to '0' before reading otherwise it will break the read loop and nothing will read to convert to array.

    public static byte[] StreamToByteArray(Stream input)
    {
        if (input == null)
            return null;
        byte[] buffer = new byte[16 * 1024];
        input.Position = 0;
        using (MemoryStream ms = new MemoryStream())
        {
            int read;
            while ((read = input.Read(buffer, 0, buffer.Length)) > 0)
            {
                ms.Write(buffer, 0, read);
            }
            byte[] temp = ms.ToArray();

            return temp;
        }
    }
2
votes

You can use this extension method.

public static class StreamExtensions
{
    public static byte[] ToByteArray(this Stream stream)
    {
        var bytes = new List<byte>();

        int b;
        while ((b = stream.ReadByte()) != -1)
            bytes.Add((byte)b);

        return bytes.ToArray();
    }
}
-1
votes
public static byte[] ToByteArray(Stream stream)
    {
        if (stream is MemoryStream)
        {
            return ((MemoryStream)stream).ToArray();
        }
        else
        {
            byte[] buffer = new byte[16 * 1024];
            using (MemoryStream ms = new MemoryStream())
            {
                int read;
                while ((read = stream.Read(buffer, 0, buffer.Length)) > 0)
                {
                    ms.Write(buffer, 0, read);
                }
                return ms.ToArray();
            }
        }            
    }
-6
votes

i was able to make it work on a single line:

byte [] byteArr= ((MemoryStream)localStream).ToArray();

as clarified by johnnyRose, Above code will only work for MemoryStream