We have two different asp.net applications with Log4net logging enabled. They both have the same version of Log4Net, 1.2.10.0.
We have added the log4net.Appender.AdoNetAppender
logger to both of them and want to log Info level to it for the root logger, but also want to log to the Error level for a root logger to a file appender.
Our configuration is as follows;
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<log4net>
<appender name="filelogAppender" type="log4net.Appender.RollingFileAppender" >
<file value="..\logs\app.debug.log" />
<encoding value="utf-8" />
<staticLogFileName value="true" />
<datePattern value=".yyyyMMdd.'log'" />
<rollingStyle value="Composite" />
<lockingModel type="log4net.Appender.FileAppender+MinimalLock" />
<appendToFile value="true" />
<maximumFileSize value="1MB" />
<layout type="log4net.Layout.PatternLayout">
<conversionPattern value="%date [%3thread] %-5level %property{log4net:HostName} [%property{Revision}] %logger %message%n" />
</layout>
</appender>
<!--
use [DB]
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Log] (
[Id] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL,
[Date] [datetime] NOT NULL,
[Application][varchar] (255) NOT NULL,
[Thread] [varchar] (255) NOT NULL,
[Level] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL,
[Logger] [varchar] (255) NOT NULL,
[Server][varchar](255) NOT NULL,
[Revision][varchar](50) NOT NULL,
[Message] [varchar] (4000) NOT NULL,
[Exception] [varchar] (2000) NULL
)
-->
<appender name="dbLogAppender" type="log4net.Appender.AdoNetAppender" xdt:Transform="InsertBefore(/log4net/root)">
<bufferSize value="100" />
<connectionType value="System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection, System.Data, Version=1.0.3300.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089" />
<connectionString value="data source=sqlserver;initial catalog=DB;integrated security=false;persist security info=True;User ID=USER;Password=PASSWORD" />
<commandText value="INSERT INTO Log ([Date],[Application],[Thread],[Level],[Logger],[Server],[Revision],[Message],[Exception]) VALUES (@log_date,'WebApp1', @thread, @log_level, @logger, @server, @revision, @message, @exception)" />
<parameter>
<parameterName value="@log_date" />
<dbType value="DateTime" />
<layout type="log4net.Layout.RawTimeStampLayout" />
</parameter>
<parameter>
<parameterName value="@thread" />
<dbType value="String" />
<size value="255" />
<layout type="log4net.Layout.PatternLayout">
<conversionPattern value="%thread" />
</layout>
</parameter>
<parameter>
<parameterName value="@log_level" />
<dbType value="String" />
<size value="50" />
<layout type="log4net.Layout.PatternLayout">
<conversionPattern value="%level" />
</layout>
</parameter>
<parameter>
<parameterName value="@logger" />
<dbType value="String" />
<size value="255" />
<layout type="log4net.Layout.PatternLayout">
<conversionPattern value="%logger" />
</layout>
</parameter>
<parameter>
<parameterName value="@server" />
<dbType value="String" />
<size value="255" />
<layout type="log4net.Layout.PatternLayout">
<conversionPattern value="%property{log4net:HostName}"/>
</layout>
</parameter>
<parameter>
<parameterName value="@revision" />
<dbType value="String" />
<size value="50" />
<layout type="log4net.Layout.PatternLayout">
<conversionPattern value="%property{Revision}"/>
</layout>
</parameter>
<parameter>
<parameterName value="@message" />
<dbType value="String" />
<size value="4000" />
<layout type="log4net.Layout.PatternLayout">
<conversionPattern value="%message" />
</layout>
</parameter>
<parameter>
<parameterName value="@exception" />
<dbType value="String" />
<size value="2000" />
<layout type="log4net.Layout.ExceptionLayout" />
</parameter>
</appender>
<root>
<level value="Error"/>
<appender-ref ref="filelogAppender"/>
</root>
<root>
<level value="Info"/>
<appender-ref ref="dbLogAppender"/>
</root>
</log4net>
The issue we are seeing is that for one application we see entries in the DB, but for the other we do not.
Revision
is GlobalContext
property we set in Application_Start()
in both applications. And the only difference between the two configurations is that we have a different hardcoded value for Application
.
Can we have two root loggers like this? Could this be the source of our issue that we are seeing in one application?