281
votes

As the title suggests. How do I do this?

I want to call whenAllDone() after the forEach-loop has gone through each element and done some asynchronous processing.

[1, 2, 3].forEach(
  function(item, index, array, done) {
     asyncFunction(item, function itemDone() {
       console.log(item + " done");
       done();
     });
  }, function allDone() {
     console.log("All done");
     whenAllDone();
  }
);

Possible to get it to work like this? When the second argument to forEach is a callback function which runs once it went through all iterations?

Expected output:

3 done
1 done
2 done
All done!
13
It would be nice if standard array forEach method had done callback parameter and allDone callback!Vanuan
It's a real shame something so simple requires so much wrestling in JavaScript.Ali

13 Answers

467
votes

Array.forEach does not provide this nicety (oh if it would) but there are several ways to accomplish what you want:

Using a simple counter

function callback () { console.log('all done'); }

var itemsProcessed = 0;

[1, 2, 3].forEach((item, index, array) => {
  asyncFunction(item, () => {
    itemsProcessed++;
    if(itemsProcessed === array.length) {
      callback();
    }
  });
});

(thanks to @vanuan and others) This approach guarantees that all items are processed before invoking the "done" callback. You need to use a counter that gets updated in the callback. Depending on the value of the index parameter does not provide the same guarantee, because the order of return of the asynchronous operations is not guaranteed.

Using ES6 Promises

(a promise library can be used for older browsers):

  1. Process all requests guaranteeing synchronous execution (e.g. 1 then 2 then 3)

    function asyncFunction (item, cb) {
      setTimeout(() => {
        console.log('done with', item);
        cb();
      }, 100);
    }
    
    let requests = [1, 2, 3].reduce((promiseChain, item) => {
        return promiseChain.then(() => new Promise((resolve) => {
          asyncFunction(item, resolve);
        }));
    }, Promise.resolve());
    
    requests.then(() => console.log('done'))
    
  2. Process all async requests without "synchronous" execution (2 may finish faster than 1)

    let requests = [1,2,3].map((item) => {
        return new Promise((resolve) => {
          asyncFunction(item, resolve);
        });
    })
    
    Promise.all(requests).then(() => console.log('done'));
    

Using an async library

There are other asynchronous libraries, async being the most popular, that provide mechanisms to express what you want.


The body of the question has been edited to remove the previously synchronous example code, so i've updated my answer to clarify. The original example used synchronous like code to model asynchronous behaviour, so the following applied:

array.forEach is synchronous and so is res.write, so you can simply put your callback after your call to foreach:

  posts.foreach(function(v, i) {
    res.write(v + ". index " + i);
  });

  res.end();
29
votes

If you encounter asynchronous functions, and you want to make sure that before executing the code it finishes its task, we can always use the callback capability.

For example:

var ctr = 0;
posts.forEach(function(element, index, array){
    asynchronous(function(data){
         ctr++; 
         if (ctr === array.length) {
             functionAfterForEach();
         }
    })
});

Note: functionAfterForEach is the function to be executed after foreach tasks are finished. asynchronous is the asynchronous function executed inside foreach.

18
votes

It's odd how many incorrect answers has been given to asynchronous case! It can be simply shown that checking index does not provide expected behavior:

// INCORRECT
var list = [4000, 2000];
list.forEach(function(l, index) {
    console.log(l + ' started ...');
    setTimeout(function() {
        console.log(index + ': ' + l);
    }, l);
});

output:

4000 started
2000 started
1: 2000
0: 4000

If we check for index === array.length - 1, callback will be called upon completion of first iteration, whilst first element is still pending!

To solve this problem without using external libraries such as async, I think your best bet is to save length of list and decrement if after each iteration. Since there's just one thread we're sure there no chance of race condition.

var list = [4000, 2000];
var counter = list.length;
list.forEach(function(l, index) {
    console.log(l + ' started ...');
    setTimeout(function() {
        console.log(index + ': ' + l);
        counter -= 1;
        if ( counter === 0)
            // call your callback here
    }, l);
});
17
votes

Hope this will fix your problem, i usually work with this when i need to execute forEach with asynchronous tasks inside.

foo = [a,b,c,d];
waiting = foo.length;
foo.forEach(function(entry){
      doAsynchronousFunction(entry,finish) //call finish after each entry
}
function finish(){
      waiting--;
      if (waiting==0) {
          //do your Job intended to be done after forEach is completed
      } 
}

with

function doAsynchronousFunction(entry,callback){
       //asynchronousjob with entry
       callback();
}
8
votes

With ES2018 you can use async iterators:

const asyncFunction = a => fetch(a);
const itemDone = a => console.log(a);

async function example() {
  const arrayOfFetchPromises = [1, 2, 3].map(asyncFunction);

  for await (const item of arrayOfFetchPromises) {
    itemDone(item);
  }

  console.log('All done');
}
3
votes

My solution without Promise (this ensures that every action is ended before the next one begins):

Array.prototype.forEachAsync = function (callback, end) {
        var self = this;
    
        function task(index) {
            var x = self[index];
            if (index >= self.length) {
                end()
            }
            else {
                callback(self[index], index, self, function () {
                    task(index + 1);
                });
            }
        }
    
        task(0);
    };
    
    
    var i = 0;
    var myArray = Array.apply(null, Array(10)).map(function(item) { return i++; });
    console.log(JSON.stringify(myArray));
    myArray.forEachAsync(function(item, index, arr, next){
      setTimeout(function(){
        $(".toto").append("<div>item index " + item + " done</div>");
        console.log("action " + item + " done");
        next();
      }, 300);
    }, function(){
        $(".toto").append("<div>ALL ACTIONS ARE DONE</div>");
        console.log("ALL ACTIONS ARE DONE");
    });
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div class="toto">

</div>
0
votes

This is the solution for Node.js which is asynchronous.

using the async npm package.

(JavaScript) Synchronizing forEach Loop with callbacks inside

0
votes

My solution:

//Object forEachDone

Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, "forEachDone", {
    enumerable: false,
    value: function(task, cb){
        var counter = 0;
        this.forEach(function(item, index, array){
            task(item, index, array);
            if(array.length === ++counter){
                if(cb) cb();
            }
        });
    }
});


//Array forEachDone

Object.defineProperty(Object.prototype, "forEachDone", {
    enumerable: false,
    value: function(task, cb){
        var obj = this;
        var counter = 0;
        Object.keys(obj).forEach(function(key, index, array){
            task(obj[key], key, obj);
            if(array.length === ++counter){
                if(cb) cb();
            }
        });
    }
});

Example:

var arr = ['a', 'b', 'c'];

arr.forEachDone(function(item){
    console.log(item);
}, function(){
   console.log('done');
});

// out: a b c done
0
votes

I try Easy Way to resolve it, share it with you :

let counter = 0;
            arr.forEach(async (item, index) => {
                await request.query(item, (err, recordset) => {
                    if (err) console.log(err);

                    //do Somthings

                    counter++;
                    if(counter == tableCmd.length){
                        sql.close();
                        callback();
                    }
                });

request is Function of mssql Library in Node js. This can replace each function or Code u want. GoodLuck

0
votes
var i=0;
const waitFor = (ms) => 
{ 
  new Promise((r) => 
  {
   setTimeout(function () {
   console.log('timeout completed: ',ms,' : ',i); 
     i++;
     if(i==data.length){
      console.log('Done')  
    }
  }, ms); 
 })
}
var data=[1000, 200, 500];
data.forEach((num) => {
  waitFor(num)
})
0
votes
 var counter = 0;
 var listArray = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4];
 function callBack() {
     if (listArray.length === counter) {
         console.log('All Done')
     }
 };
 listArray.forEach(function(element){
     console.log(element);
     counter = counter + 1;
     callBack();
 });
-2
votes

You shouldn't need a callback for iterating through a list. Just add the end() call after the loop.

posts.forEach(function(v, i){
   res.write(v + ". Index " + i);
});
res.end();
-3
votes

How about setInterval, to check for complete iteration count, brings guarantee. not sure if it won't overload the scope though but I use it and seems to be the one

_.forEach(actual_JSON, function (key, value) {

     // run any action and push with each iteration 

     array.push(response.id)

});


setInterval(function(){

    if(array.length > 300) {

        callback()

    }

}, 100);