GridView vs Buttons

Question

I have a grid of 12 non clickable buttons(they are just indicators) in the center of my page in the following manner.

There is going to be more stuff around this grid and I need the items to be at their exact place and of the same width and height. I am confused whether to use a grid with (star sized) rows and columns with buttons in them or a gridview with a wrap panel with MaxRowsAndColumns set to 3 and Orientation set to Horizontal. Here are my arguments for and against each of the approaches:-

Buttons:-

Pros:-

• Fixed position and height and width guaranteed.
• Adaptable to all screen sizes
• Easy to code

Cons:-

• Will have to write a very large XAML and C# code because I will not be able to use Data Template here and will have to define lots of variables and grids and set values of each textblock separately.

GridView

Pros:-

• DataTemplate available so easy to set values via ObservableCollection
• Smaller code than the one created using buttons

Cons:-

• No guarantees of item size. Will have to hard code it in XAML or Bind it to properties in Model and then calculate the value inside XAML.

Please let me know which one is the better alternative. Is there any other easier way to do it apart from the methods mentioned above?

Thanks, Rajeev

Answer 1

Out of the two above I would say GridView. Since you need to support so many different screen sizes and ratios you shouldn't have fixed sizes.

As the guidelines states: Guidelines for window sizes and scaling to screens(Windows Store apps)

Design apps that look good at any width, and you automatically get support for different screen sizes and orientations. Plan your app for resizing from full screen down to the minimum width so that the UI reflows gracefully for various screen sizes, window sizes, and orientations.

Since you also need to cater for the snapped mode (which you can't choose not to have in you application) having buttons will add even more manual work which means a lot of hard to maintain UI code. If you use a gridview you can pair it up with a listview for the snapped mode (gridview for full mode, listview for snapped) as in the templates.

You can certainly restrict the sizes in a GridView without it require even a fifth of the work needed for buttons, so I'm not quite sure what you mean by "No guarantees of item size".

Anyway, as the guidelines says, buttons should NOT be used for navigation to a page. These are just guidelines, but I reckon they make sense.

Here are: Guidelines and checklist for buttons (Windows Store apps)

Don't use a button when the action is to navigate to another page; use a link instead. Exception: For wizard navigation, use buttons labeled "Back" and "Next".

I would use GriView and combine it with a semantic zoom if appropriate.

Example with GridView and ItemsControl, here is the result:

Code for the UI (View):

<Page
    x:Class="App1.MainPage"
    xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
    xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
    xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
    xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
    mc:Ignorable="d">
<Grid>
    <Grid.RowDefinitions>
        <RowDefinition />
            <RowDefinition />
        </Grid.RowDefinitions>
        <GridView x:Name="gridView">
            <GridView.ItemTemplate>
                <DataTemplate>
                    <Border Width="150" Height="150" BorderBrush="Pink" BorderThickness="10" Background="Aqua">
                        <TextBlock Foreground="Black" FontSize="20"  Text="{Binding}"/>
                    </Border>
                </DataTemplate>
            </GridView.ItemTemplate>
        </GridView>
        <ItemsControl Grid.Row="1" x:Name="itemscontrol">
            <ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
                <DataTemplate>
                    <Border Width="150" Height="150" BorderBrush="Yellow" BorderThickness="10" Background="LightGreen">
                        <TextBlock Foreground="Black" FontSize="20" Text="{Binding}"/>
                    </Border>
                </DataTemplate>
            </ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
            <ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
                <ItemsPanelTemplate>
                    <WrapGrid Orientation="Horizontal" />
                </ItemsPanelTemplate>
            </ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
        </ItemsControl>
    </Grid>
</Page>

Code for the codebehind (the .cs file that belongs to the XAML):

using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace App1
{
    public sealed partial class MainPage
    {
        public MainPage()
        {
            InitializeComponent();
            DataContext = this;
            var items = new List<string> { "Iris", "Paul", "Ben", "Cate", "Daniel", "Ryan", "Iris 2", "Paul 2", "Ben 2", "Cate 2", "Daniel 2", "Ryan 2" };

            gridView.ItemsSource = items;
            itemscontrol.ItemsSource = items;
        }
    }
}

The result at a higher resolution, notice that the items keep their fixed size and don't scale to fit the screen.

Stretching the items height over one row with the GridView:

<GridView x:Name="gridView">
    <GridView.ItemTemplate>
        <DataTemplate>
            <Border Width="150" BorderBrush="Pink" BorderThickness="10" Background="Aqua">
                <TextBlock Foreground="Black" FontSize="20"  Text="{Binding}"/>
            </Border>
        </DataTemplate>
    </GridView.ItemTemplate>
    <GridView.ItemContainerStyle>
        <Style TargetType="GridViewItem">
            <Setter Property="VerticalContentAlignment" Value="Stretch" />
        </Style>
    </GridView.ItemContainerStyle>
    <GridView.ItemsPanel>
        <ItemsPanelTemplate>
             <VirtualizingStackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" />
        </ItemsPanelTemplate>
    </GridView.ItemsPanel>
</GridView>

By the way, GridView inherits from the ItemsControl if you didn't know.

Answer 2

Use ItemsControl, it offers DataTemplate as well as item size.