I'm starting to write a toy OS for the BeagleBone Black, which uses an ARM Cortex-A8-based TI Sitara AM3359 SoC and the U-Boot bootloader. I've got a simple standalone hello world app writing to UART0 that I can load through U-Boot so far, and now I'm trying to move on to interrupt handlers, but I can't get SWI to do anything but hang the device.
According to the AM335x TRM (starting on page 4099, if you're interested), the interrupt vector table is mapped in ROM at 0x20000. The ROM SWI handler branches to RAM at 0x4030ce08, which branches to the address stored at 0x4030ce28. (Initially, this is a unique dead loop at 0x20084.)
My code sets up all the ARM processor modes' SP to their own areas at the top of RAM, and enables interrupts in the CPSR, then executes an SWI instruction, which always hangs. (Perhaps jumping to some dead-loop instruction?) I've looked at a bunch of samples, and read whatever documentation I could find, and I don't see what I'm missing.
Currently my only interaction with the board is over serial connection on UART0 with my linux box. U-Boot initializes UART0, and allows loading of the binary over the serial connection.
Here's the relevant assembly:
.arm
.section ".text.boot"
.equ usr_mode, 0x10
.equ fiq_mode, 0x11
.equ irq_mode, 0x12
.equ svc_mode, 0x13
.equ abt_mode, 0x17
.equ und_mode, 0x1b
.equ sys_mode, 0x1f
.equ swi_vector, 0x4030ce28
.equ rom_swi_b_addr, 0x20008
.equ rom_swi_addr, 0x20028
.equ ram_swi_b_addr, 0x4030CE08
.equ ram_swi_addr, 0x4030CE28
.macro setup_mode mode, stackpointer
mrs r0, cpsr
mov r1, r0
and r1, r1, #0x1f
bic r0, r0, #0x1f
orr r0, r0, #\mode
msr cpsr_csfx, r0
ldr sp, =\stackpointer
bic r0, r0, #0x1f
orr r0, r0, r1
msr cpsr_csfx, r0
.endm
.macro disable_interrupts
mrs r0, cpsr
orr r0, r0, #0x80
msr cpsr_c, r0
.endm
.macro enable_interrupts
mrs r0, cpsr
bic r0, r0, #0x80
msr cpsr_c, r0
.endm
.global _start
_start:
// Initial SP
ldr r3, =_C_STACK_TOP
mov sp, r3
// Set up all the modes' stacks
setup_mode fiq_mode, _FIQ_STACK_TOP
setup_mode irq_mode, _IRQ_STACK_TOP
setup_mode svc_mode, _SVC_STACK_TOP
setup_mode abt_mode, _ABT_STACK_TOP
setup_mode und_mode, _UND_STACK_TOP
setup_mode sys_mode, _C_STACK_TOP
// Clear out BSS
ldr r0, =_bss_start
ldr r1, =_bss_end
mov r5, #0
mov r6, #0
mov r7, #0
mov r8, #0
b _clear_bss_check$
_clear_bss$:
stmia r0!, {r5-r8}
_clear_bss_check$:
cmp r0, r1
blo _clear_bss$
// Load our SWI handler's address into
// the vector table
ldr r0, =_swi_handler
ldr r1, =swi_vector
str r0, [r1]
// Debug-print out these SWI addresses
ldr r0, =rom_swi_b_addr
bl print_mem
ldr r0, =rom_swi_addr
bl print_mem
ldr r0, =ram_swi_b_addr
bl print_mem
ldr r0, =ram_swi_addr
bl print_mem
enable_interrupts
swi_call$:
swi #0xCC
bl kernel_main
b _reset
.global _swi_handler
_swi_handler:
// Get the SWI parameter into r0
ldr r0, [lr, #-4]
bic r0, r0, #0xff000000
// Save lr onto the stack
stmfd sp!, {lr}
bl print_uint32
ldmfd sp!, {pc}
Those debugging prints produce the expected values:
00020008: e59ff018
00020028: 4030ce08
4030ce08: e59ff018
4030ce28: 80200164
(According to objdump, 0x80200164 is indeed _swi_handler. 0xe59ff018 is the instruction "ldr pc, [pc, #0x20]".)
What am I missing? It seems like this should work.
0x0
of the board (or where ever the real vector is). On the ARM, it is not a vector table, but vector code. I don't know if this has any relevance. How does0x0+swi_offset
get to your routine? I would toggle a GPIO to know it was getting to the routine. Cortex processors allow mapping the exception table to values other than 0x0 and 0xffff0000. – artless noise