265
votes

I have cloned a repository, after which somebody else has created a new branch, which I'd like to start working on. I read the manual, and it seems dead straight easy. Strangely it's not working, and all the posts I've found suggest I'm doing the right thing. So I'll subject myself to the lambasting, because there must be something obviously wrong with this:

The correct action seems to be

git fetch
git branch -a
* master
  remotes/origin/HEAD --> origin/master
  remotes/origin/master
git checkout -b dev-gml origin/dev-gml

At this point there is a problem, for some reason after git fetch I can't see the dev-gml remote branch. Why not? If I clone the repository freshly, it's there, so certainly the remote branch exists:

$ mkdir ../gitest
$ cd ../gitest
$ git clone https://github.com/example/proj.git
Cloning into proj...
remote: Counting objects: 1155, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (383/383), done.
remote: Total 1155 (delta 741), reused 1155 (delta 741)
Receiving objects: 100% (1155/1155), 477.22 KiB | 877 KiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (741/741), done.
$ cd projdir
$ git branch -a
* master
  remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
  remotes/origin/dev-gml
  remotes/origin/master

I've tried git update, git pull, git fetch --all, git pretty-please in all possible permutations...

10
What does git config --get remote.origin.fetch produce? If it's not +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*, it probably should be.torek
yup that's exactly what it producesEdward Newell
Exactly the same problem, but the comment above solved it! I had +refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/origin/master with master instead of *Mirko
Same problem for me, but none of the suggestions on this page solves it. Weird.Magnus
@thoni56: Yes, this is likely due to a shallow clone.Trần Việt Hoàng

10 Answers

513
votes

The problem can be seen when checking the remote.origin.fetch setting
(The lines starting with $ are bash prompts with the commands I typed. The other lines are the resulting output)

$ git config --get remote.origin.fetch
+refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/origin/master

As you can see, in my case, the remote was set to fetch the master branch specifically and only. I fixed it as per below, including the second command to check the results.

$ git config remote.origin.fetch "+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*"
$ git config --get remote.origin.fetch
+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*

The wildcard * of course means everything under that path.

Unfortunately I saw this comment after I had already dug through and found the answer by trial and error.

156
votes

I had this issue today on a repo.

It wasn't the +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* issue as per top solution.

Symptom was simply that git fetch origin or git fetch just didn't appear to do anything, although there were remote branches to fetch.

After trying lots of things, I removed the origin remote, and recreated it. That seems to have fixed it. Don't know why.

remove with: git remote rm origin

and recreate with: git remote add origin <git uri>

78
votes

Remote update

You need to run

git remote update

or

git remote update <remote> 

Then you can run git branch -r to list the remote branches.

Checkout a new branch

To track a (new) remote branch as a local branch:

git checkout -b <local branch> <remote>/<remote branch>

or (sometimes it doesn't work without the extra remotes/):

git checkout -b <local branch> remotes/<remote>/<remote branch>

Helpful git cheatsheets

9
votes

write it from the terminal

git fetch --prune.

it works fine.

9
votes

Had the same problem today setting up my repo from scratch. I tried everything, nothing worked except removing the origin and re-adding it back again.

git remote rm origin
git remote add origin [email protected]:web3coach/the-blockchain-bar-newsletter-edition.git

git fetch --all
// Ta daaa all branches fetched
4
votes

To make it more specific Create a tracking branch, which means you are now tracking a remote branch.

git branch --track branch remote-branch
git branch --track exp remotes/origin/experimental

After which you can

git branch   # to see the remote tracking branch "exp" created .

Then to work on that branch do

git checkout branchname
git checkout exp

After you have made changes to the branch. You can git fetch and git merge with your remote tracking branch to merge your changes and push to the remote branch as below.

git fetch origin
git merge origin/experimental  
git push origin/experimental

Hope it helps and gives you an idea, how this works.

3
votes

I had a similar problem, however in my case I could pull/push to the remote branch but git status didn't show the local branch state w.r.t the remote ones.

Also, in my case git config --get remote.origin.fetch didn't return anything

The problem is that there was a typo in the .git/config file in the fetch line of the respective remote block. Probably something I added by mistake previously (sometimes I directly look at this file, or even edit it)

So, check if your remote entry in the .git/config file is correct, e.g.:

[remote "origin"]
    url = https://[server]/[user or organization]/[repo].git
    fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
0
votes

This could be due to a face palm moment: if you switch between several clones it is easy to find yourself in the wrong source tree trying to pull a non-existent branch. It is easier when the clones have similar names, or the repos are distinct clones for the same project from each of multiple contributors. A new git clone would obviously seem to solve that "problem" when the real problem is losing focus or working context or both.

0
votes

I had to go into my GitExtensions Remote Repositories as nothing here seemed to be working. There I saw that 2 branches had no remote repository configured. after adjusting it looks as followsenter image description here

Notice branch noExternal3 still shows as not having a remote repository. Not sure what combo of bash commands would have found or adjusted that.

-1
votes

We had the same problem and you have to use

git fetch

git push origin branch_name

git branch -r

Hope this help someone facing the same problem