11
votes

Is there a way to get OpenCL to give me a list of all unique physical devices which have an OpenCL implementation available? I know how to iterate through the platform/device list but for instance, in my case, I have one Intel-provided platform which gives me an efficient device implementation for my CPU, and the APP platform which provides a fast implementation for my GPU but a terrible implementation for my CPU.

Is there a way to work out that the two CPU devices are in fact the same physical device, so that I can choose the most efficient one and work with that, instead of using both and having them contend with each other for compute time on the single physical device?

I have looked at CL_DEVICE_VENDOR_ID and CL_DEVICE_NAME but they don't solve my issues, the CL_DEVICE_NAME will be the same for two separate physical devices of the same model (dual GPU's) and CL_DEVICE_VENDOR_ID gives me a different ID for my CPU depending on the platform.

An ideal solution would be some sort of unique physical device ID, but I'd be happy with manually altering the OpenCL configuration to rearrange the devices myself (if such a thing is possible).

4
i don't get the question.. so you want to choose between two CPUs with the identical specs? - ardiyu07
I want to use all available physical devices (for an easily parallelizable problem) - and I want to only use a single logical device by physical device otherwise I get contention. - Thomas

4 Answers

5
votes

As far as I could investigate the issue now, there is no reliable solution. If all your work is done within a single process, you may use the order of entries returned by clGetDeviceIDs or cl_device values themselves (essentially they're pointers), but things get worse if you try to share those identifiers between processes.

See that guy's blog post about it, saying:

The issue is that if you have two identical GPUs, you can’t distinguish between them. If you call clGetDeviceIDs, the order in which they are returned is actually unspecified, so if the first process picks the first device and the second takes the second device, they both may wind up oversubscribing the same GPU and leaving the other one idle.

However, he notes that nVidia and AMD provide their custom extensions, cl_amd_device_topology and cl_nv_device_attribute_query. You may check whether these extensions are supported by your device, and then use them as the following (the code by original author):

// This cl_ext is provided as part of the AMD APP SDK
#include <CL/cl_ext.h>

cl_device_topology_amd topology;
status = clGetDeviceInfo (devices[i], CL_DEVICE_TOPOLOGY_AMD,
    sizeof(cl_device_topology_amd), &topology, NULL);

if(status != CL_SUCCESS) {
    // Handle error
}

if (topology.raw.type == CL_DEVICE_TOPOLOGY_TYPE_PCIE_AMD) {
    std::cout << "INFO: Topology: " << "PCI[ B#" << (int)topology.pcie.bus
        << ", D#" << (int)topology.pcie.device << ", F#"
        << (int)topology.pcie.function << " ]" << std::endl;
}

or (code by me, adapted from the above linked post):

#define CL_DEVICE_PCI_BUS_ID_NV  0x4008
#define CL_DEVICE_PCI_SLOT_ID_NV 0x4009

cl_int bus_id;
cl_int slot_id;

status = clGetDeviceInfo (devices[i], CL_DEVICE_PCI_BUS_ID_NV,
    sizeof(cl_int), &bus_id, NULL);
if (status != CL_SUCCESS) {
    // Handle error.
}

status = clGetDeviceInfo (devices[i], CL_DEVICE_PCI_BUS_ID_NV,
    sizeof(cl_int), &slot_id, NULL);
if (status != CL_SUCCESS) {
    // Handle error.
}

std::cout << "Topology = [" << bus_id <<
                         ":"<< slot_id << "]" << std::endl;
3
votes
  • If you have two devices of the exact same kind belonging to a platform, you can tell them apart by the associated cl_device_ids return by clGetDeviceIDs.

  • If you have devices that can be used by two different platforms you can eliminate the entries for the second platform by comparing the device names from CL_DEVICE_NAME.

  • If you want to find the intended platform for a device, compare the CL_PLATFORM_VENDOR and CL_DEVICE_VENDOR strings from clGetPlatformInfo() and clGetDeviceInfo respectively.

You can read in all platforms and all their associated devices into separate platform-specific lists and then eliminate doubles by comparing the device names in the separate lists. This should ensure that you do not get the same device for different platforms.

Finally you can, by command line arguments or configuration file for example, give arguments to your application to associate devices of a certain type (CPU, GPU, Accelerator) with a specific platform if there exists a choice of different platforms for a device type. Hopefully this will answer your question.

0
votes

anyway let's just assume that you are trying to pull the unique id for all devices, actually you can just simply query with clGetDeviceIDs:

cl_int clGetDeviceIDs(cl_platform_id platform,
                      cl_device_type device_type,
                      cl_uint num_entries,
                      cl_device_id *devices,
                      cl_uint *num_devices)

then your list of device will be inserted to the *devices array, and then you can do clGetDeviceInfo() to find out which device you'd like to use.

0
votes

Combining answers above, my solution was:

long bus = 0; // leave it 0 for Intel
// update bus for NVIDIA/AMD ...
// ...
long uid = (bus << 5) | device_type;

Variable bus was computed according NVIDIA/AMD device-specific info queries, as mentioned firegurafiku, variable device_type was result of clGetDeviceInfo(clDevice, CL_DEVICE_TYPE, sizeof(cl_device_type), &device_type, nullptr) API call, as Steinin suggested.

Such approach solved issue of having equal unique ID for Intel CPU with integrated GPU. Now both devices have unique identifiers, thank to different CL_DEVICE_TYPE's.

Surprizingly, the case of running code on Oclgrind-emulated device, Oclgrind simulator device also gets unique identifier 15, disctinct from any other on my system.

The only case when proposed approach can fail - several CPUs of same model on a single mainboard.