What is the purpose of paging + next_page in the twitter search api? - they don't pivot around data as one would expect.
I'm experimenting with the search api and noticed the following query changes overtime. This url was returned from search api "next_page".
hit refresh on a trending topic and you will notice that the page is not constant.
When iterating through all 15 pages on a trending topic you run into duplicates on the first few items on each page.
It seems the paging variable + next_page are useless if you were aggregating data. page 1 will be page 3 in a few minutes of a trending topic. So you end up with duplicates on 1-3 items of each page since new data is pushing the pages down.
The only way to avoid this is by NOT using next_page and or paging parameter as discussed here:
https://dev.twitter.com/discussions/3809
I pass the oldest id from my existing result set as the max_id. I do not pass a page.
which approach is better for aggregating data?
i could use next_page but skip statuses already processed on this run of 15 pages.
or
use max_id only and skip already processed
==============