Lose EF Code First Migration when working on different TFS branches?

32
votes

We are using TFS and have different branches for our Dev.

  1. in the branch A we made a migration to change a column size

  2. in the branch B we made a migration to add a new table. This branch doesn not know about the branch A modification !!

  3. both modification are merged to the main branch.

When I do an update database, it does the 2 migration but at the end tells me there is pending changes. If I do an Add-Migration, it creates the same as the 1st migration (in branch A).

Unable to update database to match the current model because there are pending changes and automatic migration is disabled. Either write the pending model changes to a code-based migration or enable automatic migration. Set DbMigrationsConfiguration.AutomaticMigrationsEnabled to true to enable automatic migration. You can use the Add-Migration command to write the pending model changes to a code-based migration.

Is it because something is missing in the content of the property Target de IMigrationMetadata of my last migration since it didn't know about the 1st one ?

Is it possible to handle migrations in different TFS branches?

3
.netentity-frameworkcoldfusionef-code-firstentity-framework-migrations
are you synchronizing just migration files - or also the databases as well? You might be better off just sync-ing the model/classes files, w/o migrations, and running Add-Migration to generate specific 'local' migration for each developer. – NSGaga-mostly-inactive
is migration 1 listed as run in the _migrationhistory table? – Betty

3 Answers

35
votes

An EF migration step contains a metadata file, that has a signature of the model that is the result of the migration step. The problem when merging is that the signature of the migration done in branch B doesn't include the stuff done in the migration in branch A. As long as the migrations are in the branches, this is correct. When merging it becomes wrong.

To remedy it, you have to regenerate the meta-data of the latter migration with

add-migration MyMigrationName

Running add-migration on an existing migration without the -force parameter will regenerate just the metadata.

I wrote an in depth walk-through of a merging scenario in the EF Migrations and a Merge Conflict post on my blog.

1
votes

As an addition to Anders Abel's answer and for those of you who are having the issue when trying to regenerate the last migrations metadata causing EF to create a separate migration with a 1 appended to it.

You must include the full date/time stamp.

E.g.

If the filename of your previous migration is 201701011322_MakeChangesToPotatoTable

Then you must include the fullname properly in the "Add-Migration" command.

I.E.

Add-Migration 201701011322_MakeChangesToPotatoTable
0
votes

With EF core, the current state of the model is kept in ***ModelSnapshot.cs. It is normally merged so you don't have anything to do... unless there is a conflict.