JIT Optimizations at their finest

Question

I have read and heard a lot about how JIT compilers can make optimizations that are impossible for Native Code Compilers and that these optimizations can give huge performance boosts.

So I was wondering, what are the most important optimizations that, say, the .NET Framework or the JVM do that a native compiler cannot do? Also, how do these give huge performance boosts?

_{I don't know whether I've phrased this question properly, guess I may have a lot of explaining to do in the comments}

@TimMedora: The link appears to talk about optimizations performed by the C# ahead-of-time compiler, not the CLR just-in-time compiler. — Dietrich Epp

Dietrich Epp Dietrich Epp · Accepted Answer · 2012-04-13T08:22:11

I can give an example of one optimization. Suppose you have a function somewhere. (Think of this as C-like pseudocode.)

void function(MyClass x)
{
    x.doSomething();
    for (obj in x.getWidgets())
        obj.doSomethingElse();
}

This is suitably vague. Suppose, however, that you only have one concrete class in your entire image that inherits from MyClass: MyConcreteClass. In that case, the JIT can inline doSomething and getWidgets. If it knows about the type returned from getWidgets, then maybe it can inline doSomethingElse as well.

Assuming here that MyClass is not a final/sealed class, an ahead-of-time compiler cannot inline its method (it wouldn't know which functions to inline); for all the compiler knows, there are a hundred different implementations of MyClass.

However, a JIT can optimize for the current state of the image. It can install a check in the beginning of each call to function that makes sure that x is a MyConcreteClass, and then run the inlined version. If you dynamically load a module with another concrete class inheriting from MyClass, then the check will fail and the JIT will recompile the function to be generic.

These are the only kinds of optimizations available to JIT compilers that aren't available to ahead-of-time compilers: optimizations that make use of information about the dynamic state of the program and recompile the program accordingly.

Note that some ahead-of-time compilers are capable of doing tricks typically ascribed to JIT compilers. For example, interprocedural optimization (or global optimization) and profile-driven optimization. GCC and Clang can use both of those tricks, but most people leave them off since it requires extra (human) work to turn them on. JIT compilers can leave those options enabled without bothering end users.

Huge performance boost: I haven't heard of any huge performance boost in general from JIT compilers. C and C++ programs are still fast without JIT. And many people still prefer Fortran for numerical work (with good reason).

Footnote: I'm not sure about your terminology. Aren't most JITs also native code compilers? The other types of compiler besides JIT I would call "ahead of time" or AOT, or perhaps "static". (And then there's the incredibly fuzzy line between "compiled" and "interpreted".)

JIT Optimizations at their finest

2 Answers