I have two data frames (DF1 and DF2):
(1) DF1 contains information on individual-level, i.e. on 10.000 individuals nested in 30 units across 11 years (2000-2011). It contains four variables:
- "individual" (numeric id for each individual; ranging from 1-10.000)
- "unit" (numeric id for each unit; ranging from 1-30)
- "date1" (a date in date format, i.e. 2000-01-01, etc; ranging from 2000-01-01 to 2010-12-31)
- "date2" ("Date1" + 1 year)
(2) DF2 contains information on unit-level, i.e. on the same 30 units as in DF1 across the same time period (2000-2011) and further contains a numeric variable ("x"):
- "unit" (numeric id for each unit; ranging from 1-30)
- "date" (a date in date format, i.e. 2000-01-01, etc; ranging from 2000-01-01 to 2011-12-31)
- "x" (a numeric variable, ranging from 0 to 200)
I would like to create new variable ("newvar") that gives me for each "individual" per "unit" the sum of "x" (DF2) counting from "date1" (DF1) to "date2" (DF2). This means that I would like to add this new variable to DF1.
For instance, if "individual"=1 in "unit"=1 has "date1"=2000-01-01 and "date2"=2001-01-01, and in DF2 "unit"=1 has three observations in the time period "date1" to "date2" (i.e. 2000-01-01 to 2001-01-01) with "x"=1, "x"=2 and "x"=3, then I would like add a new variable that gives for "individual"=1 in "unit"=1 "newvar"=6.
I assume that I need to use a for loop in R and have been using the following code:
for(i in length(DF1)){
DF1$newvar[i] <-sum(DF2$x[which(DF1$date == DF1$date1[i] &
DF1$date == DF1P$date1[i] &
DF2$unit == DF1P$unit[i]),])
}
but get the error message:
Error in DF2$x[which(DF2$date == : incorrect number of dimensions
Any ideas of how to create this variable would be tremendously appreciated!
Here is a small example as well as the expected output, using one unit for the sake of simplicity:
Assume DF1 looks as follows:
individual unit date1 date2
1 1 2000-01-01 2001-01-01
2 1 2000-02-02 2001-02-02
3 1 2000-03-03 2000-03-03
4 1 2000-04-04 2000-04-04
5 1 2000-12-31 2001-12-31
(...)
996 1 2010-01-01 2011-01-01
997 1 2010-02-15 2011-02-15
998 1 2010-03-05 2011-03-05
999 1 2010-04-10 2011-04-10
1000 1 2010-12-27 2011-12-27
1001 2 2000-01-01 2001-01-01
1002 2 2000-02-02 2001-02-02
1003 2 2000-03-03 2000-03-03
1004 2 2000-04-04 2000-04-04
1005 2 2000-12-31 2001-12-31
(...)
1996 2 2010-01-01 2011-01-01
1997 2 2010-02-15 2011-02-15
1998 2 2010-03-05 2011-03-05
1999 2 2010-04-10 2011-04-10
2000 2 2010-12-027 2011-12-27
(...)
3000 34 2000-02-02 2002-02-02
3001 34 2000-05-05 2001-05-05
3002 34 2000-06-06 2001-06-06
3003 34 2000-07-07 2001-07-07
3004 34 2000-11-11 2001-11-11
(...)
9996 34 2010-02-06 2011-02-06
9997 34 2010-05-05 2011-05-05
9998 34 2010-09-09 2011-09-09
9999 34 2010-09-25 2011-09-25
10000 34 2010-10-15 2011-10-15
Assume DF2 looks as follows:
unit date x
1 2000-01-01 1
1 2000-05-01 2
1 2000-12-01 3
1 2001-01-02 10
1 2001-07-05 20
1 2001-12-31 30
(...)
2 2010-05-05 1
2 2010-07-01 1
2 2010-08-09 1
3 (...)
This is what I would like DF1 to look like after running the code:
individual unit date1 date2 newvar
1 1 2000-01-01 2001-01-01 6
2 1 2000-02-02 2001-02-02 16
3 1 2000-03-03 2001-03-03 15
4 1 2000-04-04 2001-04-04 15
5 1 2000-12-31 2001-12-31 60
(...)
996 1 2010-01-01 2011-01-01 3
997 1 2010-02-15 2011-02-15 2
998 1 2010-03-05 2011-03-05 2
999 1 2010-04-10 2011-04-10 2
1000 1 2010-12-27 2011-12-27 0
(...)
However, I cannot simply aggregate: Imagine that in DF1 each "unit" has several hundreds of individuals for each year between 2000 and 2011. And DF2 has many observations for each unit across the years 2000-2011.
DF2$x
) as two dimensional, when it has only 1 dimension. You need to delete the comma before your last paranthesis:,])
– Bea