I'm training a CNN model with tensorflow. I only achieve a GPU utilization of 60% (+- 2-3%) without big drops.
Sun Oct 23 11:34:26 2016
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 367.57 Driver Version: 367.57 |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
| 0 GeForce GTX 1070 Off | 0000:01:00.0 Off | N/A |
| 1% 53C P2 90W / 170W | 7823MiB / 8113MiB | 60% Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes: GPU Memory |
| GPU PID Type Process name Usage |
|=============================================================================|
| 0 3644 C /usr/bin/python2.7 7821MiB |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Since it's a Pascal card I am using CUDA 8 with cudnn 5.1.5 The CPU usage is around 50% (evenly distributed over 8 threads. i7 4770k), so the CPU performance should not be the bottleneck.
I'm using the binary file format of Tensorflow with and read with tf.TFRecordReader()
I'm creating batches of images like this:
#Uses tf.TFRecordReader() to read single Example
label, image = read_and_decode_single_example(filename_queue=filename_queue)
image = tf.image.decode_jpeg(image.values[0], channels=3)
jpeg = tf.cast(image, tf.float32) / 255.
jpeg.set_shape([66,200,3])
images_batch, labels_batch = tf.train.shuffle_batch(
[jpeg, label], batch_size= FLAGS.batch_size,
num_threads=8,
capacity=2000, #tried bigger values here, does not change the performance
min_after_dequeue=1000) #here too
Here is my training loop:
sess = tf.Session()
sess.run(init)
tf.train.start_queue_runners(sess=sess)
for step in xrange(FLAGS.max_steps):
labels, images = sess.run([labels_batch, images_batch])
feed_dict = {images_placeholder: images, labels_placeholder: labels}
_, loss_value = sess.run([train_op, loss],
feed_dict=feed_dict)
I don't have much experience with tensorflow, and I don't now where the bottleneck could be. If you need any more code snippets to help identify the issue, I will provide them.
UPDATE: Bandwidth test results
==5172== NVPROF is profiling process 5172, command: ./bandwidthtest
Device: GeForce GTX 1070
Transfer size (MB): 3960
Pageable transfers
Host to Device bandwidth (GB/s): 7.066359
Device to Host bandwidth (GB/s): 6.850315
Pinned transfers
Host to Device bandwidth (GB/s): 12.038037
Device to Host bandwidth (GB/s): 12.683915
==5172== Profiling application: ./bandwidthtest
==5172== Profiling result:
Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name
50.03% 933.34ms 2 466.67ms 327.33ms 606.01ms [CUDA memcpy DtoH]
49.97% 932.32ms 2 466.16ms 344.89ms 587.42ms [CUDA memcpy HtoD]
==5172== API calls:
Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name
46.60% 1.86597s 4 466.49ms 327.36ms 606.15ms cudaMemcpy
35.43% 1.41863s 2 709.31ms 632.94ms 785.69ms cudaMallocHost
17.89% 716.33ms 2 358.17ms 346.14ms 370.19ms cudaFreeHost
0.04% 1.5572ms 1 1.5572ms 1.5572ms 1.5572ms cudaMalloc
0.02% 708.41us 1 708.41us 708.41us 708.41us cudaFree
0.01% 203.58us 1 203.58us 203.58us 203.58us cudaGetDeviceProperties
0.00% 187.55us 1 187.55us 187.55us 187.55us cuDeviceTotalMem
0.00% 162.41us 91 1.7840us 105ns 61.874us cuDeviceGetAttribute
0.00% 79.979us 4 19.994us 1.9580us 73.537us cudaEventSynchronize
0.00% 77.074us 8 9.6340us 1.5860us 28.925us cudaEventRecord
0.00% 19.282us 1 19.282us 19.282us 19.282us cuDeviceGetName
0.00% 17.891us 4 4.4720us 629ns 8.6080us cudaEventDestroy
0.00% 16.348us 4 4.0870us 818ns 8.8600us cudaEventCreate
0.00% 7.3070us 4 1.8260us 1.7040us 2.0680us cudaEventElapsedTime
0.00% 1.6670us 3 555ns 128ns 1.2720us cuDeviceGetCount
0.00% 813ns 3 271ns 142ns 439ns cuDeviceGet