271
votes

AngularJS has the & parameters where you could pass a callback to a directive (e.g AngularJS way of callbacks. Is it possible to pass a callback as an @Input for an Angular Component (something like below)? If not what would be the closest thing to what AngularJS does?

@Component({
    selector: 'suggestion-menu',
    providers: [SuggestService],
    template: `
    <div (mousedown)="suggestionWasClicked(suggestion)">
    </div>`,
    changeDetection: ChangeDetectionStrategy.Default
})
export class SuggestionMenuComponent {
    @Input() callback: Function;

    suggestionWasClicked(clickedEntry: SomeModel): void {
        this.callback(clickedEntry, this.query);
    }
}


<suggestion-menu callback="insertSuggestion">
</suggestion-menu>
10
for future readers @Input way suggested made my code spagetti and not easy to maintain.. @Outputs are a much more natural way of doing what I want. As a result I changed the accepted answerMichail Michailidis
@IanS question is about how something is done in Angular similar to AngularJS? why is title misleading?Michail Michailidis
Angular is very different from AngularJS. Angular 2+ is just Angular.Ian S
Fixed your title ;)Ian S
@IanS Thanks! now the question is about angularJs too though - with the tag you added though.Michail Michailidis

10 Answers

351
votes

I think that is a bad solution. If you want to pass a Function into component with @Input(), @Output() decorator is what you are looking for.

export class SuggestionMenuComponent {
    @Output() onSuggest: EventEmitter<any> = new EventEmitter();

    suggestionWasClicked(clickedEntry: SomeModel): void {
        this.onSuggest.emit([clickedEntry, this.query]);
    }
}

<suggestion-menu (onSuggest)="insertSuggestion($event[0],$event[1])">
</suggestion-menu>
129
votes

UPDATE

This answer was submitted when Angular 2 was still in alpha and many of the features were unavailable / undocumented. While the below will still work, this method is now entirely outdated. I strongly recommend the accepted answer over the below.

Original Answer

Yes in fact it is, however you will want to make sure that it is scoped correctly. For this I've used a property to ensure that this means what I want it to.

@Component({
  ...
  template: '<child [myCallback]="theBoundCallback"></child>',
  directives: [ChildComponent]
})
export class ParentComponent{
  public theBoundCallback: Function;

  public ngOnInit(){
    this.theBoundCallback = this.theCallback.bind(this);
  }

  public theCallback(){
    ...
  }
}

@Component({...})
export class ChildComponent{
  //This will be bound to the ParentComponent.theCallback
  @Input()
  public myCallback: Function; 
  ...
}
42
votes

In some cases, you might need business logic to be performed by a parent component. In the example below we have a child component that renders table row depending on the logic provided by the parent component:

@Component({
  ...
  template: '<table-component [getRowColor]="getColor"></table-component>',
  directives: [TableComponent]
})
export class ParentComponent {

 // Pay attention on the way this function is declared. Using fat arrow (=>) declaration 
 // we can 'fixate' the context of `getColor` function
 // so that it is bound to ParentComponent as if .bind(this) was used.
 getColor = (row: Row) => {
    return this.fancyColorService.getUserFavoriteColor(row);
 }

}

@Component({...})
export class TableComponent{
  // This will be bound to the ParentComponent.getColor. 
  // I found this way of declaration a bit safer and convenient than just raw Function declaration
  @Input('getRowColor') getRowColor: (row: Row) => Color;

  renderRow(){
    ....
    // Notice that `getRowColor` function holds parent's context because of a fat arrow function used in the parent
    const color = this.getRowColor(row);
    renderRow(row, color);
  }
}

So, I wanted to demonstrate 2 things here:

  1. Fat arrow (=>) functions instead of .bind(this) to hold the right context;
  2. Typesafe declaration of a callback function in the child component.
34
votes

An alternative to the answer SnareChops gave.

You can use .bind(this) in your template to have the same effect. It may not be as clean but it saves a couple of lines. I'm currently on angular 2.4.0

@Component({
  ...
  template: '<child [myCallback]="theCallback.bind(this)"></child>',
  directives: [ChildComponent]
})
export class ParentComponent {

  public theCallback(){
    ...
  }
}

@Component({...})
export class ChildComponent{
  //This will be bound to the ParentComponent.theCallback
  @Input()
  public myCallback: Function; 
  ...
}
11
votes

An alternative to the answer Max Fahl gave.

You can define callback function as an arrow function in the parent component so that you won't need to bind that.

@Component({
  ...
  // unlike this, template: '<child [myCallback]="theCallback.bind(this)"></child>',
  template: '<child [myCallback]="theCallback"></child>',
  directives: [ChildComponent]
})
export class ParentComponent {

   // unlike this, public theCallback(){
   public theCallback = () => {
    ...
  }
}

@Component({...})
export class ChildComponent{
  //This will be bound to the ParentComponent.theCallback
  @Input()
  public myCallback: Function; 
  ...
}
8
votes

As an example, I am using a login modal window, where the modal window is the parent, the login form is the child and the login button calls back to the modal parent's close function.

The parent modal contains the function to close the modal. This parent passes the close function to the login child component.

import { Component} from '@angular/core';
import { LoginFormComponent } from './login-form.component'

@Component({
  selector: 'my-modal',
  template: `<modal #modal>
      <login-form (onClose)="onClose($event)" ></login-form>
    </modal>`
})
export class ParentModalComponent {
  modal: {...};

  onClose() {
    this.modal.close();
  }
}

After the child login component submits the login form, it closes the parent modal using the parent's callback function

import { Component, EventEmitter, Output } from '@angular/core';

@Component({
  selector: 'login-form',
  template: `<form (ngSubmit)="onSubmit()" #loginForm="ngForm">
      <button type="submit">Submit</button>
    </form>`
})
export class ChildLoginComponent {
  @Output() onClose = new EventEmitter();
  submitted = false;

  onSubmit() {
    this.onClose.emit();
    this.submitted = true;
  }
}
5
votes

Passing method with argument, using .bind inside template

@Component({
  ...
  template: '<child [action]="foo.bind(this, 'someArgument')"></child>',
  ...
})
export class ParentComponent {
  public foo(someParameter: string){
    ...
  }
}

@Component({...})
export class ChildComponent{

  @Input()
  public action: Function; 

  ...
}
2
votes

Another alternative.

The OP asked a way to use a callback. In this case he was referring specifically to a function that process an event (in his example: a click event), which shall be treated as the accepted answer from @serginho suggests: with @Output and EventEmitter.

However, there is a difference between a callback and an event: With a callback your child component can retrieve some feedback or information from the parent, but an event only can inform that something happened without expect any feedback.

There are use cases where a feedback is necessary, ex. get a color, or a list of elements that the component needs to handle. You can use bound functions as some answers have suggested, or you can use interfaces (that's always my preference).

Example

Let's suppose you have a generic component that operates over a list of elements {id, name} that you want to use with all your database tables that have these fields. This component should:

  • retrieve a range of elements (page) and show them in a list
  • allow remove an element
  • inform that an element was clicked, so the parent can take some action(s).
  • allow retrieve the next page of elements.

Child Component

Using normal binding we would need 1 @Input() and 3 @Output() parameters (but without any feedback from the parent). Ex. <list-ctrl [items]="list" (itemClicked)="click($event)" (itemRemoved)="removeItem($event)" (loadNextPage)="load($event)" ...>, but creating an interface we will need only one @Input():

import {Component, Input, OnInit} from '@angular/core';

export interface IdName{
  id: number;
  name: string;
}

export interface IListComponentCallback<T extends IdName> {
    getList(page: number, limit: number): Promise< T[] >;
    removeItem(item: T): Promise<boolean>;
    click(item: T): void;
}

@Component({
    selector: 'list-ctrl',
    template: `
      <button class="item" (click)="loadMore()">Load page {{page+1}}</button>
      <div class="item" *ngFor="let item of list">
          <button (click)="onDel(item)">DEL</button>
          <div (click)="onClick(item)">
            Id: {{item.id}}, Name: "{{item.name}}"
          </div>
      </div>
    `,
    styles: [`
      .item{ margin: -1px .25rem 0; border: 1px solid #888; padding: .5rem; width: 100%; cursor:pointer; }
      .item > button{ float: right; }
      button.item{margin:.25rem;}
    `]
})
export class ListComponent implements OnInit {
    @Input() callback: IListComponentCallback<IdName>; // <-- CALLBACK
    list: IdName[];
    page = -1; 
    limit = 10;

    async ngOnInit() {
      this.loadMore();
    }
    onClick(item: IdName) {
      this.callback.click(item);   
    }
    async onDel(item: IdName){ 
        if(await this.callback.removeItem(item)) {
          const i = this.list.findIndex(i=>i.id == item.id);
          this.list.splice(i, 1);
        }
    }
    async loadMore(){
      this.page++;
      this.list = await this.callback.getList(this.page, this.limit); 
    }
}

Parent Component

Now we can use the list component in the parent.

import { Component } from "@angular/core";
import { SuggestionService } from "./suggestion.service";
import { IdName, IListComponentCallback } from "./list.component";

type Suggestion = IdName;

@Component({
  selector: "my-app",
  template: `
    <list-ctrl class="left" [callback]="this"></list-ctrl>
    <div class="right" *ngIf="msg">{{ msg }}<br/><pre>{{item|json}}</pre></div>
  `,
  styles:[`
    .left{ width: 50%; }
    .left,.right{ color: blue; display: inline-block; vertical-align: top}
    .right{max-width:50%;overflow-x:scroll;padding-left:1rem}
  `]
})
export class ParentComponent implements IListComponentCallback<Suggestion> {
  msg: string;
  item: Suggestion;

  constructor(private suggApi: SuggestionService) {}

  getList(page: number, limit: number): Promise<Suggestion[]> {
    return this.suggApi.getSuggestions(page, limit);
  }
  removeItem(item: Suggestion): Promise<boolean> {
    return this.suggApi.removeSuggestion(item.id)
      .then(() => {
        this.showMessage('removed', item);
        return true;
      })
      .catch(() => false);
  }
  click(item: Suggestion): void {
    this.showMessage('clicked', item);
  }
  private showMessage(msg: string, item: Suggestion) {
    this.item = item;
    this.msg = 'last ' + msg;
  }
}

Note that the <list-ctrl> receives this (parent component) as the callback object. One additional advantage is that it's not required to send the parent instance, it can be a service or any object that implements the interface if your use case allows it.

The complete example is on this stackblitz.

0
votes

Use Observable pattern. You can put Observable value (not Subject) into Input parameter and manage it from parent component. You do not need callback function.

See example: https://stackoverflow.com/a/49662611/4604351

-3
votes

The current answer can be simplified to...

@Component({
  ...
  template: '<child [myCallback]="theCallback"></child>',
  directives: [ChildComponent]
})
export class ParentComponent{
  public theCallback(){
    ...
  }
}

@Component({...})
export class ChildComponent{
  //This will be bound to the ParentComponent.theCallback
  @Input()
  public myCallback: Function; 
  ...
}