Scenario: a class uses Jdk1.7 java.util.HashMap with get() and put() being the only methods called. A am trying to avoid synchronization on get() method. The previously synchronized method ClassloaderHashMap.get() can block all of my threads for seconds when a new class has to be loaded. The nature of class loading is that the objects are added to the HashMap and never removed. My application is using 400 threads and 30'000 classes. I can't use ConcurrentHashMap.
/**
* Class to simulate lock free reads from HashMap in WebClassLoader.
*/
public static class ClassloaderHashMap {
private final HashMap<String, String> testHashMap = new HashMap<String, String>();
public String get(String key) {
if (testHashMap.containsKey(key)) {
String result = testHashMap.get(key);
if (result != null) {
return result;
}
}
// call synchronized method
return writeAndGet(key);
}
private synchronized String writeAndGet(String key) {
// find and load class by key, for the test scenario simply use value=key
testHashMap.put(key, key);
return testHashMap.get(key);
}
}
Question: Is there a potential danger with this solution?
I successfully tested a multi-threaded scenario with this code:
package alex;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
import java.util.concurrent.CyclicBarrier;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong;
public class PerfTestLockFreeReadHashMap {
private static final ExecutorService EXECUTOR = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
private static final int KEY_COUNT = 30179; // same number of loaded classes
// as in my app
private static int NUM_WRITERS = 20;
private static int NUM_READERS = 400;
private static long TEST_DURATION_MS = 1000;
private static final String[] keysArray = new String[KEY_COUNT];
static {
for (int i = 0; i < keysArray.length; i++) {
keysArray[i] = "com.company.SomeClass-" + i;
}
}
/**
* Class to simulate lock free reads from HashMap in WebClassLoader.
*/
public static class ClassloaderHashMap {
private final HashMap<String, String> testHashMap = new HashMap<String, String>();
private AtomicLong reads = new AtomicLong();
private AtomicLong nullentries = new AtomicLong();
private AtomicLong writes = new AtomicLong();
public String get(String key) {
if (testHashMap.containsKey(key)) {
reads.incrementAndGet();
String result = testHashMap.get(key);
if (result != null) {
return result;
} else {
nullentries.incrementAndGet();
}
}
// call synchronized method
return writeAndGet(key);
}
public synchronized String writeAndGet(String key) {
writes.incrementAndGet();
testHashMap.put(key, key);
return testHashMap.get(key);
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return "ClassloaderHashMap [Lock-free reads=" + reads + ", Null entries=" + nullentries + ", writes=" + writes + "]";
}
}
public static void main(final String[] args) throws Exception {
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
ClassloaderHashMap classloaderHashMap = new ClassloaderHashMap();
System.out.println("*** Run - " + i);
perfRun(classloaderHashMap);
System.out.println(classloaderHashMap);
}
EXECUTOR.shutdown();
}
public static void perfRun(final ClassloaderHashMap classloaderHashMap) throws Exception {
final CyclicBarrier startBarrier = new CyclicBarrier(NUM_READERS + NUM_WRITERS + 1);
final CountDownLatch finishLatch = new CountDownLatch(NUM_READERS + NUM_WRITERS);
final AtomicBoolean runningFlag = new AtomicBoolean(true);
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_WRITERS; i++) {
EXECUTOR.execute(new WriterRunner(classloaderHashMap, i, runningFlag, startBarrier, finishLatch));
}
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_READERS; i++) {
EXECUTOR.execute(new ReaderRunner(classloaderHashMap, i, runningFlag, startBarrier, finishLatch));
}
awaitBarrier(startBarrier);
Thread.sleep(TEST_DURATION_MS);
runningFlag.set(false);
finishLatch.await();
System.out.format("%d readers %d writers \n", NUM_READERS, NUM_WRITERS);
}
public static void awaitBarrier(final CyclicBarrier barrier) {
try {
barrier.await();
} catch (final Exception ex) {
throw new RuntimeException(ex);
}
}
public static class WriterRunner implements Runnable {
private final int id;
private final AtomicBoolean runningFlag;
private final CyclicBarrier barrier;
private final CountDownLatch latch;
private final ClassloaderHashMap classloaderHashMap;
public WriterRunner(final ClassloaderHashMap classloaderHashMap, final int id, final AtomicBoolean runningFlag, final CyclicBarrier barrier,
final CountDownLatch latch) {
this.id = id;
this.runningFlag = runningFlag;
this.barrier = barrier;
this.latch = latch;
this.classloaderHashMap = classloaderHashMap;
}
@Override
public void run() {
awaitBarrier(barrier);
int writeCounter = 0;
while (runningFlag.get()) {
String key = writeCounter + keysArray[writeCounter % KEY_COUNT] + id;
String result = classloaderHashMap.get(key);
if (result == null) {
result = classloaderHashMap.writeAndGet(key);
}
if (!key.equals(result)) {
throw new RuntimeException(String.format("Got %s instead of %s.\n", result, key));
}
++writeCounter;
}
latch.countDown();
}
}
public static class ReaderRunner implements Runnable {
private final int id;
private final AtomicBoolean runningFlag;
private final CyclicBarrier barrier;
private final CountDownLatch latch;
private final ClassloaderHashMap classloaderHashMap;
public ReaderRunner(final ClassloaderHashMap classloaderHashMap, final int id, final AtomicBoolean runningFlag, final CyclicBarrier barrier,
final CountDownLatch latch) {
this.id = id;
this.runningFlag = runningFlag;
this.barrier = barrier;
this.latch = latch;
this.classloaderHashMap = classloaderHashMap;
}
@Override
public void run() {
awaitBarrier(barrier);
int readCounter = 0;
while (runningFlag.get()) {
String key = keysArray[readCounter % keysArray.length] + "-" + id;
String result = classloaderHashMap.get(key);
if (result == null) {
result = classloaderHashMap.writeAndGet(key);
}
if (!key.equals(result)) {
throw new RuntimeException(String.format("Got %s instead of %s.\n", result, key));
}
++readCounter;
}
latch.countDown();
}
}
}
Sample output - null entry can happen but does not cause an error, the synchronized method is called in this case:
*** Run - 0
400 readers 20 writers
ClassloaderHashMap [Lock-free reads=4288664, Null entries=0, writes=589699]
*** Run - 1
400 readers 20 writers
ClassloaderHashMap [Lock-free reads=4177513, Null entries=0, writes=965519]
*** Run - 2
400 readers 20 writers
ClassloaderHashMap [Lock-free reads=4701346, Null entries=0, writes=971986]
*** Run - 3
400 readers 20 writers
ClassloaderHashMap [Lock-free reads=8181871, Null entries=1, writes=2076311]
*** Run - 4
400 readers 20 writers
ClassloaderHashMap [Lock-free reads=3225071, Null entries=0, writes=616041]
*** Run - 5
400 readers 20 writers
ClassloaderHashMap [Lock-free reads=2923419, Null entries=0, writes=1762663]
*** Run - 6
400 readers 20 writers
ClassloaderHashMap [Lock-free reads=5514584, Null entries=0, writes=1090732]
*** Run - 7
400 readers 20 writers
ClassloaderHashMap [Lock-free reads=4037333, Null entries=0, writes=948106]
*** Run - 8
400 readers 20 writers
ClassloaderHashMap [Lock-free reads=6604630, Null entries=0, writes=750456]
*** Run - 9
400 readers 20 writers
ClassloaderHashMap [Lock-free reads=5263678, Null entries=0, writes=894637]
HashMap
offers no guarantee of thread safety to start with; so what's the point of your test? – fge