Given an item, how can I count its occurrences in a list in Python?
28 Answers
2150
votes
If you only want one item's count, use the count method:
>>> [1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 1].count(1)
3
Important Note regarding count performance
Don't use this if you want to count multiple items.
Calling count in a loop requires a separate pass over the list for every count call, which can be catastrophic for performance.
If you want to count all items, or even just multiple items, use Counter, as explained in the other answers.
2047
votes
Use Counter if you are using Python 2.7 or 3.x and you want the number of occurrences for each element:
>>> from collections import Counter
>>> z = ['blue', 'red', 'blue', 'yellow', 'blue', 'red']
>>> Counter(z)
Counter({'blue': 3, 'red': 2, 'yellow': 1})
312
votes
Counting the occurrences of one item in a list
For counting the occurrences of just one list item you can use count()
>>> l = ["a","b","b"]
>>> l.count("a")
1
>>> l.count("b")
2
Counting the occurrences of all items in a list is also known as "tallying" a list, or creating a tally counter.
Counting all items with count()
To count the occurrences of items in l one can simply use a list comprehension and the count() method
[[x,l.count(x)] for x in set(l)]
(or similarly with a dictionary dict((x,l.count(x)) for x in set(l)))
Example:
>>> l = ["a","b","b"]
>>> [[x,l.count(x)] for x in set(l)]
[['a', 1], ['b', 2]]
>>> dict((x,l.count(x)) for x in set(l))
{'a': 1, 'b': 2}
Counting all items with Counter()
Alternatively, there's the faster Counter class from the collections library
Counter(l)
Example:
>>> l = ["a","b","b"]
>>> from collections import Counter
>>> Counter(l)
Counter({'b': 2, 'a': 1})
How much faster is Counter?
I checked how much faster Counter is for tallying lists. I tried both methods out with a few values of n and it appears that Counter is faster by a constant factor of approximately 2.
Here is the script I used:
from __future__ import print_function
import timeit
t1=timeit.Timer('Counter(l)', \
'import random;import string;from collections import Counter;n=1000;l=[random.choice(string.ascii_letters) for x in range(n)]'
)
t2=timeit.Timer('[[x,l.count(x)] for x in set(l)]',
'import random;import string;n=1000;l=[random.choice(string.ascii_letters) for x in range(n)]'
)
print("Counter(): ", t1.repeat(repeat=3,number=10000))
print("count(): ", t2.repeat(repeat=3,number=10000)
And the output:
Counter(): [0.46062711701961234, 0.4022796869976446, 0.3974247490405105]
count(): [7.779430688009597, 7.962715800967999, 8.420845870045014]
77
votes
52
votes
list.count(x) returns the number of times x appears in a list
see: http://docs.python.org/tutorial/datastructures.html#more-on-lists
52
votes
Given an item, how can I count its occurrences in a list in Python?
Here's an example list:
>>> l = list('aaaaabbbbcccdde')
>>> l
['a', 'a', 'a', 'a', 'a', 'b', 'b', 'b', 'b', 'c', 'c', 'c', 'd', 'd', 'e']
list.count
There's the list.count method
>>> l.count('b')
4
This works fine for any list. Tuples have this method as well:
>>> t = tuple('aabbbffffff')
>>> t
('a', 'a', 'b', 'b', 'b', 'f', 'f', 'f', 'f', 'f', 'f')
>>> t.count('f')
6
collections.Counter
And then there's collections.Counter. You can dump any iterable into a Counter, not just a list, and the Counter will retain a data structure of the counts of the elements.
Usage:
>>> from collections import Counter
>>> c = Counter(l)
>>> c['b']
4
Counters are based on Python dictionaries, their keys are the elements, so the keys need to be hashable. They are basically like sets that allow redundant elements into them.
Further usage of collections.Counter
You can add or subtract with iterables from your counter:
>>> c.update(list('bbb'))
>>> c['b']
7
>>> c.subtract(list('bbb'))
>>> c['b']
4
And you can do multi-set operations with the counter as well:
>>> c2 = Counter(list('aabbxyz'))
>>> c - c2 # set difference
Counter({'a': 3, 'c': 3, 'b': 2, 'd': 2, 'e': 1})
>>> c + c2 # addition of all elements
Counter({'a': 7, 'b': 6, 'c': 3, 'd': 2, 'e': 1, 'y': 1, 'x': 1, 'z': 1})
>>> c | c2 # set union
Counter({'a': 5, 'b': 4, 'c': 3, 'd': 2, 'e': 1, 'y': 1, 'x': 1, 'z': 1})
>>> c & c2 # set intersection
Counter({'a': 2, 'b': 2})
Why not pandas?
Another answer suggests:
Why not use pandas?
Pandas is a common library, but it's not in the standard library. Adding it as a requirement is non-trivial.
There are builtin solutions for this use-case in the list object itself as well as in the standard library.
If your project does not already require pandas, it would be foolish to make it a requirement just for this functionality.
39
votes
38
votes
I've compared all suggested solutions (and a few new ones) with perfplot (a small project of mine).
Counting one item
For large enough arrays, it turns out that
numpy.sum(numpy.array(a) == 1)
is slightly faster than the other solutions.
Counting all items
numpy.bincount(a)
is what you want.
Code to reproduce the plots:
from collections import Counter
from collections import defaultdict
import numpy
import operator
import pandas
import perfplot
def counter(a):
return Counter(a)
def count(a):
return dict((i, a.count(i)) for i in set(a))
def bincount(a):
return numpy.bincount(a)
def pandas_value_counts(a):
return pandas.Series(a).value_counts()
def occur_dict(a):
d = {}
for i in a:
if i in d:
d[i] = d[i]+1
else:
d[i] = 1
return d
def count_unsorted_list_items(items):
counts = defaultdict(int)
for item in items:
counts[item] += 1
return dict(counts)
def operator_countof(a):
return dict((i, operator.countOf(a, i)) for i in set(a))
perfplot.show(
setup=lambda n: list(numpy.random.randint(0, 100, n)),
n_range=[2**k for k in range(20)],
kernels=[
counter, count, bincount, pandas_value_counts, occur_dict,
count_unsorted_list_items, operator_countof
],
equality_check=None,
logx=True,
logy=True,
)
2.
from collections import Counter
from collections import defaultdict
import numpy
import operator
import pandas
import perfplot
def counter(a):
return Counter(a)
def count(a):
return dict((i, a.count(i)) for i in set(a))
def bincount(a):
return numpy.bincount(a)
def pandas_value_counts(a):
return pandas.Series(a).value_counts()
def occur_dict(a):
d = {}
for i in a:
if i in d:
d[i] = d[i]+1
else:
d[i] = 1
return d
def count_unsorted_list_items(items):
counts = defaultdict(int)
for item in items:
counts[item] += 1
return dict(counts)
def operator_countof(a):
return dict((i, operator.countOf(a, i)) for i in set(a))
perfplot.show(
setup=lambda n: list(numpy.random.randint(0, 100, n)),
n_range=[2**k for k in range(20)],
kernels=[
counter, count, bincount, pandas_value_counts, occur_dict,
count_unsorted_list_items, operator_countof
],
equality_check=None,
logx=True,
logy=True,
)
24
votes
If you can use pandas, then value_counts is there for rescue.
>>> import pandas as pd
>>> a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 1]
>>> pd.Series(a).value_counts()
1 3
4 2
3 1
2 1
dtype: int64
It automatically sorts the result based on frequency as well.
If you want the result to be in a list of list, do as below
>>> pd.Series(a).value_counts().reset_index().values.tolist()
[[1, 3], [4, 2], [3, 1], [2, 1]]
17
votes
Why not using Pandas?
import pandas as pd
l = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'a', 'd', 'a']
# converting the list to a Series and counting the values
my_count = pd.Series(l).value_counts()
my_count
Output:
a 3
d 2
b 1
c 1
dtype: int64
If you are looking for a count of a particular element, say a, try:
my_count['a']
Output:
3
14
votes
I had this problem today and rolled my own solution before I thought to check SO. This:
dict((i,a.count(i)) for i in a)
is really, really slow for large lists. My solution
def occurDict(items):
d = {}
for i in items:
if i in d:
d[i] = d[i]+1
else:
d[i] = 1
return d
is actually a bit faster than the Counter solution, at least for Python 2.7.
13
votes
# Python >= 2.6 (defaultdict) && < 2.7 (Counter, OrderedDict)
from collections import defaultdict
def count_unsorted_list_items(items):
"""
:param items: iterable of hashable items to count
:type items: iterable
:returns: dict of counts like Py2.7 Counter
:rtype: dict
"""
counts = defaultdict(int)
for item in items:
counts[item] += 1
return dict(counts)
# Python >= 2.2 (generators)
def count_sorted_list_items(items):
"""
:param items: sorted iterable of items to count
:type items: sorted iterable
:returns: generator of (item, count) tuples
:rtype: generator
"""
if not items:
return
elif len(items) == 1:
yield (items[0], 1)
return
prev_item = items[0]
count = 1
for item in items[1:]:
if prev_item == item:
count += 1
else:
yield (prev_item, count)
count = 1
prev_item = item
yield (item, count)
return
import unittest
class TestListCounters(unittest.TestCase):
def test_count_unsorted_list_items(self):
D = (
([], []),
([2], [(2,1)]),
([2,2], [(2,2)]),
([2,2,2,2,3,3,5,5], [(2,4), (3,2), (5,2)]),
)
for inp, exp_outp in D:
counts = count_unsorted_list_items(inp)
print inp, exp_outp, counts
self.assertEqual(counts, dict( exp_outp ))
inp, exp_outp = UNSORTED_WIN = ([2,2,4,2], [(2,3), (4,1)])
self.assertEqual(dict( exp_outp ), count_unsorted_list_items(inp) )
def test_count_sorted_list_items(self):
D = (
([], []),
([2], [(2,1)]),
([2,2], [(2,2)]),
([2,2,2,2,3,3,5,5], [(2,4), (3,2), (5,2)]),
)
for inp, exp_outp in D:
counts = list( count_sorted_list_items(inp) )
print inp, exp_outp, counts
self.assertEqual(counts, exp_outp)
inp, exp_outp = UNSORTED_FAIL = ([2,2,4,2], [(2,3), (4,1)])
self.assertEqual(exp_outp, list( count_sorted_list_items(inp) ))
# ... [(2,2), (4,1), (2,1)]
13
votes
Below are the three solutions:
Fastest is using a for loop and storing it in a Dict.
import time
from collections import Counter
def countElement(a):
g = {}
for i in a:
if i in g:
g[i] +=1
else:
g[i] =1
return g
z = [1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,3,3,4,5,5,234,23,3,12,3,123,12,31,23,13,2,4,23,42,42,34,234,23,42,34,23,423,42,34,23,423,4,234,23,42,34,23,4,23,423,4,23,4]
#Solution 1 - Faster
st = time.monotonic()
for i in range(1000000):
b = countElement(z)
et = time.monotonic()
print(b)
print('Simple for loop and storing it in dict - Duration: {}'.format(et - st))
#Solution 2 - Fast
st = time.monotonic()
for i in range(1000000):
a = Counter(z)
et = time.monotonic()
print (a)
print('Using collections.Counter - Duration: {}'.format(et - st))
#Solution 3 - Slow
st = time.monotonic()
for i in range(1000000):
g = dict([(i, z.count(i)) for i in set(z)])
et = time.monotonic()
print(g)
print('Using list comprehension - Duration: {}'.format(et - st))
Result
#Solution 1 - Faster
{1: 4, 2: 5, 3: 4, 4: 6, 5: 2, 234: 3, 23: 10, 12: 2, 123: 1, 31: 1, 13: 1, 42: 5, 34: 4, 423: 3}
Simple for loop and storing it in dict - Duration: 12.032000000000153
#Solution 2 - Fast
Counter({23: 10, 4: 6, 2: 5, 42: 5, 1: 4, 3: 4, 34: 4, 234: 3, 423: 3, 5: 2, 12: 2, 123: 1, 31: 1, 13: 1})
Using collections.Counter - Duration: 15.889999999999418
#Solution 3 - Slow
{1: 4, 2: 5, 3: 4, 4: 6, 5: 2, 34: 4, 423: 3, 234: 3, 42: 5, 12: 2, 13: 1, 23: 10, 123: 1, 31: 1}
Using list comprehension - Duration: 33.0
12
votes
Count of all elements with itertools.groupby()
Antoher possiblity for getting the count of all elements in the list could be by means of itertools.groupby().
With "duplicate" counts
from itertools import groupby
L = ['a', 'a', 'a', 't', 'q', 'a', 'd', 'a', 'd', 'c'] # Input list
counts = [(i, len(list(c))) for i,c in groupby(L)] # Create value-count pairs as list of tuples
print(counts)
Returns
[('a', 3), ('t', 1), ('q', 1), ('a', 1), ('d', 1), ('a', 1), ('d', 1), ('c', 1)]
Notice how it combined the first three a's as the first group, while other groups of a are present further down the list. This happens because the input list L was not sorted. This can be a benefit sometimes if the groups should in fact be separate.
With unique counts
If unique group counts are desired, just sort the input list:
counts = [(i, len(list(c))) for i,c in groupby(sorted(L))]
print(counts)
Returns
[('a', 5), ('c', 1), ('d', 2), ('q', 1), ('t', 1)]
Note: For creating unique counts, many of the other answers provide easier and more readable code compared to the groupby solution. But it is shown here to draw a parallel to the duplicate count example.
8
votes
It was suggested to use numpy's bincount, however it works only for 1d arrays with non-negative integers. Also, the resulting array might be confusing (it contains the occurrences of the integers from min to max of the original list, and sets to 0 the missing integers).
A better way to do it with numpy is to use the unique function with the attribute return_counts set to True. It returns a tuple with an array of the unique values and an array of the occurrences of each unique value.
# a = [1, 1, 0, 2, 1, 0, 3, 3]
a_uniq, counts = np.unique(a, return_counts=True) # array([0, 1, 2, 3]), array([2, 3, 1, 2]
and then we can pair them as
dict(zip(a_uniq, counts)) # {0: 2, 1: 3, 2: 1, 3: 2}
It also works with other data types and "2d lists", e.g.
>>> a = [['a', 'b', 'b', 'b'], ['a', 'c', 'c', 'a']]
>>> dict(zip(*np.unique(a, return_counts=True)))
{'a': 3, 'b': 3, 'c': 2}
8
votes
Although it is very old question, since i didn't find a one liner, i made one.
# original numbers in list
l = [1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4]
# empty dictionary to hold pair of number and its count
d = {}
# loop through all elements and store count
[ d.update( {i:d.get(i, 0)+1} ) for i in l ]
print(d)
# {1: 1, 2: 2, 3: 3, 4: 1}
7
votes
4
votes
3
votes
May not be the most efficient, requires an extra pass to remove duplicates.
Functional implementation :
arr = np.array(['a','a','b','b','b','c'])
print(set(map(lambda x : (x , list(arr).count(x)) , arr)))
returns :
{('c', 1), ('b', 3), ('a', 2)}
or return as dict :
print(dict(map(lambda x : (x , list(arr).count(x)) , arr)))
returns :
{'b': 3, 'c': 1, 'a': 2}
3
votes
3
votes
2
votes
1
votes
0
votes
0
votes
l2=[1,"feto",["feto",1,["feto"]],['feto',[1,2,3,['feto']]]]
count=0
def Test(l):
global count
if len(l)==0:
return count
count=l.count("feto")
for i in l:
if type(i) is list:
count+=Test(i)
return count
print(Test(l2))
this will recursive count or search for the item in the list even if it in list of lists
0
votes
-1
votes
